↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SEU010+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 03:44:22 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  13   ~;  10   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   1 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t42_funct_1,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( relation(A)
        & function(A) )
     => ( relation_composition(identity_relation(relation_dom(A)),A) = A
        & relation_composition(A,identity_relation(relation_rng(A))) = A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t42_funct_1) ).

fof(t42_funct_1_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( ( relation(A)
          & function(A) )
       => ( relation_composition(identity_relation(relation_dom(A)),A) = A
          & relation_composition(A,identity_relation(relation_rng(A))) = A ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[t42_funct_1]) ).

cnf(53,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(relation_dom(sK10)),sK10) != sK10
    | relation_composition(sK10,identity_relation(relation_rng(sK10))) != sK10 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t42_funct_1_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(relation_dom(sK10)),sK10) != sK10
    | relation_composition(sK10,identity_relation(relation_rng(sK10))) != sK10 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

fof(t77_relat_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ( subset(relation_dom(B),A)
       => relation_composition(identity_relation(A),B) = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t77_relat_1) ).

cnf(54,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ subset(relation_dom(X0),X1)
    | relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X0) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t77_relat_1]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ relation(sK10)
    | ~ subset(relation_dom(sK10),relation_dom(sK10))
    | relation_composition(identity_relation(relation_dom(sK10)),sK10) = sK10 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[54]) ).

fof(t79_relat_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ( subset(relation_rng(B),A)
       => relation_composition(B,identity_relation(A)) = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t79_relat_1) ).

cnf(55,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X0),X1)
    | relation_composition(X0,identity_relation(X1)) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t79_relat_1]) ).

cnf(l9,plain,
    ( ~ relation(sK10)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(sK10),relation_rng(sK10))
    | relation_composition(sK10,identity_relation(relation_rng(sK10))) = sK10 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[55]) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,plain,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    subset(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    subset(relation_dom(sK10),relation_dom(sK10)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

cnf(l11,plain,
    subset(relation_rng(sK10),relation_rng(sK10)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

cnf(51,plain,
    relation(sK10),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t42_funct_1_negated]) ).

cnf(l5,plain,
    relation(sK10),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[51]) ).

cnf(l10,plain,
    relation(sK10),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[51]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l9,l3,l11,l5,l10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU010+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 21 23:14:04 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------