%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : lazyCoP---0.1 % Problem : SEU010+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:52:47 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 9.17s 1.54s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.14 % Problem : SEU010+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.03/0.15 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 23:59:44 EDT 2022 % 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime : % 9.17/1.54 % SZS status Theorem % 9.17/1.54 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c0, axiom, % 9.17/1.54 relation(sK9)). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c1, plain, % 9.17/1.54 relation(sK9), % 9.17/1.54 inference(start, [], [c0])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c2, axiom, % 9.17/1.54 relation_composition(identity_relation(X0),X1) = X1 | ~subset(relation_dom(X1),X0) | ~relation(X1)). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a0, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 sK9 = X1). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c3, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c4, plain, % 9.17/1.54 relation_composition(identity_relation(X0),X1) = X1 | ~subset(relation_dom(X1),X0), % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c5, axiom, % 9.17/1.54 sK9 != relation_composition(sK9,identity_relation(relation_rng(sK9))) | sK9 != relation_composition(identity_relation(relation_dom(sK9)),sK9)). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a1, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 relation_composition(identity_relation(relation_dom(sK9)),sK9) = relation_composition(identity_relation(X0),X1)). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c6, plain, % 9.17/1.54 ~subset(relation_dom(X1),X0), % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c4, c5])). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c7, plain, % 9.17/1.54 sK9 != relation_composition(sK9,identity_relation(relation_rng(sK9))), % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c4, c5])). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c8, plain, % 9.17/1.54 sK9 != X1, % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c4, c5])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a2, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 sK9 = X1). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c9, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c8])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c10, axiom, % 9.17/1.54 relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3)) = X2 | ~subset(relation_rng(X2),X3) | ~relation(X2)). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a3, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 relation_composition(sK9,identity_relation(relation_rng(sK9))) = relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3))). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c11, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c7, c10])). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c12, plain, % 9.17/1.54 ~subset(relation_rng(X2),X3) | ~relation(X2), % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c7, c10])). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c13, plain, % 9.17/1.54 X4 != X2 | sK9 != X4, % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c7, c10])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a4, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 X4 = X2). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c14, plain, % 9.17/1.54 sK9 != X4, % 9.17/1.54 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c13])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a5, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 sK9 = X4). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c15, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c14])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c16, axiom, % 9.17/1.54 subset(X5,X5)). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a6, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 relation_rng(X2) = X5). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a7, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 X3 = X5). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c17, plain, % 9.17/1.54 ~relation(X2), % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c12, c16])). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c18, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c12, c16])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c19, plain, % 9.17/1.54 relation(sK9)). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a8, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 X2 = sK9). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c20, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a8])], [c17, c19])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c21, axiom, % 9.17/1.54 subset(X6,X6)). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a9, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 relation_dom(X1) = X6). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(a10, assumption, % 9.17/1.54 X0 = X6). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c22, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a9, a10])], [c6, c21])). % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c23, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a9, a10])], [c6, c21])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 cnf(c24, plain, % 9.17/1.54 $false, % 9.17/1.54 inference(constraint_solving, [ % 9.17/1.54 bind(X0, relation_dom(sK9)), % 9.17/1.54 bind(X1, sK9), % 9.17/1.54 bind(X2, sK9), % 9.17/1.54 bind(X3, relation_rng(sK9)), % 9.17/1.54 bind(X4, sK9), % 9.17/1.54 bind(X5, relation_rng(X2)), % 9.17/1.54 bind(X6, relation_dom(X1)) % 9.17/1.54 ], % 9.17/1.54 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10])). % 9.17/1.54 % 9.17/1.54 % SZS output end IncompleteProof %------------------------------------------------------------------------------