%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU012+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:23:40 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 8.60s 6.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 193 ( 56 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 255 ( 101 ~; 105 |; 32 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 14 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 65 ( 0 sgn 34 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d5_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] :
( X3 = apply(X1,X4)
& in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).
fof(t44_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( ( relation_composition(X1,X2) = X1
& relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(X2) )
=> X2 = identity_relation(relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t44_funct_1) ).
fof(t23_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( function(X3)
& relation(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
=> apply(relation_composition(X2,X3),X1) = apply(X3,apply(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).
fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( function(relation_composition(X1,X2))
& relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& relation(X1) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(t34_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ( ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> apply(X2,X3) = X3 )
& relation_dom(X2) = X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11,X13,X14,X15,X17] :
( ( ~ function(X9)
| ~ relation(X9)
| X15 = relation_rng(X9)
| in(esk2_2(X9,X15),X15)
| esk2_2(X9,X15) = apply(X9,esk3_2(X9,X15)) )
& ( ~ function(X9)
| ~ relation(X9)
| X15 = relation_rng(X9)
| in(esk2_2(X9,X15),X15)
| in(esk3_2(X9,X15),relation_dom(X9)) )
& ( ~ function(X9)
| ~ relation(X9)
| X15 = relation_rng(X9)
| esk2_2(X9,X15) != apply(X9,X17)
| ~ in(X17,relation_dom(X9))
| ~ in(esk2_2(X9,X15),X15) )
& ( ~ function(X9)
| ~ relation(X9)
| X10 != relation_rng(X9)
| in(X13,X10)
| X13 != apply(X9,X14)
| ~ in(X14,relation_dom(X9)) )
& ( ~ function(X9)
| ~ relation(X9)
| X10 != relation_rng(X9)
| ~ in(X11,X10)
| X11 = apply(X9,esk1_3(X9,X10,X11)) )
& ( ~ function(X9)
| ~ relation(X9)
| X10 != relation_rng(X9)
| ~ in(X11,X10)
| in(esk1_3(X9,X10,X11),relation_dom(X9)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( ( relation_composition(X1,X2) = X1
& relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(X2) )
=> X2 = identity_relation(relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t44_funct_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| X3 != relation_rng(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| X1 = apply(X2,esk1_3(X2,X3,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X49,X50,X51] :
( apply(relation_composition(X50,X51),X49) = apply(X51,apply(X50,X49))
| ~ in(X49,relation_dom(X50))
| ~ function(X51)
| ~ relation(X51)
| ~ function(X50)
| ~ relation(X50) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t23_funct_1])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X26,X27] :
( ( ~ function(X27)
| ~ relation(X27)
| ~ function(X26)
| ~ relation(X26)
| function(relation_composition(X26,X27)) )
& ( ~ function(X27)
| ~ relation(X27)
| ~ function(X26)
| ~ relation(X26)
| relation(relation_composition(X26,X27)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X19,X20] :
( relation(relation_composition(X19,X20))
| ~ relation(X20)
| ~ relation(X19) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2)
| in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( esk15_0 != identity_relation(relation_dom(esk15_0))
& relation_composition(esk14_0,esk15_0) = esk14_0
& relation_rng(esk14_0) = relation_dom(esk15_0)
& function(esk15_0)
& relation(esk15_0)
& function(esk14_0)
& relation(esk14_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(X1,esk1_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2)) = X2 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| in(esk1_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
relation_rng(esk14_0) = relation_dom(esk15_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk14_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
function(esk14_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X54,X55,X56] :
( ( ~ function(X55)
| ~ relation(X55)
| X55 = identity_relation(X54)
| relation_dom(X55) != X54
| apply(X55,esk13_2(X54,X55)) != esk13_2(X54,X55) )
& ( ~ function(X55)
| ~ relation(X55)
| X55 = identity_relation(X54)
| relation_dom(X55) != X54
| in(esk13_2(X54,X55),X54) )
& ( ~ function(X55)
| ~ relation(X55)
| X55 != identity_relation(X54)
| apply(X55,X56) = X56
| ~ in(X56,X54) )
& ( ~ function(X55)
| ~ relation(X55)
| X55 != identity_relation(X54)
| relation_dom(X55) = X54 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t34_funct_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ in(X3,relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ~ in(esk1_3(relation_composition(X2,X1),relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X1)),X3),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(X1,apply(X2,esk1_3(relation_composition(X2,X1),relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X1)),X3))) = X3 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
relation_composition(esk14_0,esk15_0) = esk14_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk15_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
function(esk15_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0))
| in(esk1_3(esk14_0,relation_dom(esk15_0),X1),relation_dom(esk14_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| relation_dom(X2) != X1
| X2 = identity_relation(X1)
| in(esk13_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0))
| apply(esk15_0,apply(esk14_0,esk1_3(esk14_0,relation_dom(esk15_0),X1))) = X1 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_19]),c_0_25]),c_0_20]),c_0_26]),c_0_21]),c_0_19]),c_0_19])]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0))
| apply(esk14_0,esk1_3(esk14_0,relation_dom(esk15_0),X1)) = X1 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| in(esk13_2(relation_dom(X1),X1),relation_dom(X1))
| identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = X1 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
esk15_0 != identity_relation(relation_dom(esk15_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_dom(X1) != X2
| apply(X1,esk13_2(X2,X1)) != esk13_2(X2,X1)
| X1 = identity_relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0))
| apply(esk15_0,X1) = X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
in(esk13_2(relation_dom(esk15_0),esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(X1,esk13_2(relation_dom(X1),X1)) != esk13_2(relation_dom(X1),X1)
| identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = X1 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
apply(esk15_0,esk13_2(relation_dom(esk15_0),esk15_0)) = esk13_2(relation_dom(esk15_0),esk15_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SEU012+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/5.45 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.18/5.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/5.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/5.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/5.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/5.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/5.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/5.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:47:10 UTC 2026
% 0.18/5.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/5.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/5.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/5.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.60/6.66 % Version: 3.5.1
% 8.60/6.66 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.60/6.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1811568 completed with status 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.60/6.66 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.60/6.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.60/6.66 % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.60/6.66 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 8.60/6.66 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 136s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1811575 completed with status 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.60/6.66 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.60/6.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.60/6.66 % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.60/6.66 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 8.60/6.66 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 8.60/6.66 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 8.60/6.66 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.60/6.66
% 8.60/6.66 % Proof found!
% 8.60/6.66 % SZS status Theorem
% 8.60/6.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.60/6.66 % Parsed axioms : 39
% 8.60/6.66 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Initial clauses : 69
% 8.60/6.66 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Initial clauses in saturation : 69
% 8.60/6.66 % Processed clauses : 5569
% 8.60/6.66 % ...of these trivial : 6
% 8.60/6.66 % ...subsumed : 4676
% 8.60/6.66 % ...remaining for further processing : 887
% 8.60/6.66 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 8.60/6.66 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Backward-subsumed : 120
% 8.60/6.66 % Backward-rewritten : 13
% 8.60/6.66 % Generated clauses : 42715
% 8.60/6.66 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 35697
% 8.60/6.66 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 60
% 8.60/6.66 % Paramodulations : 42708
% 8.60/6.66 % Factorizations : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % NegExts : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Equation resolutions : 8
% 8.60/6.66 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Total rewrite steps : 29449
% 8.60/6.66 % ...of those cached : 29346
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional check models : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 8.60/6.66 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 8.60/6.66 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 8.60/6.66 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 8.60/6.66 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 8.60/6.66 % Current number of processed clauses : 683
% 8.60/6.66 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 35
% 8.60/6.66 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Negative unit clauses : 22
% 8.60/6.66 % Non-unit-clauses : 626
% 8.60/6.66 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29507
% 8.60/6.66 % ...number of literals in the above : 131802
% 8.60/6.66 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Current number of archived clauses : 197
% 8.60/6.66 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 214516
% 8.60/6.66 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 157493
% 8.60/6.66 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3570
% 8.60/6.66 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1008
% 8.60/6.66 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 8.60/6.66 % BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 8.60/6.66 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Condensation successes : 0
% 8.60/6.66 % Termbank termtop insertions : 569898
% 8.60/6.66 % Search garbage collected termcells : 785
% 8.60/6.66
% 8.60/6.66 % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.60/6.66 % User time : 1.029 s
% 8.60/6.66 % System time : 0.039 s
% 8.60/6.66 % Total time : 1.068 s
% 8.60/6.66 % Maximum resident set size: 3664 pages
% 8.60/6.66
% 8.60/6.66 % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.60/6.66 % User time : 5.123 s
% 8.60/6.66 % System time : 0.236 s
% 8.60/6.66 % Total time : 5.359 s
% 8.60/6.66 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 8.60/6.66 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------