%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SEU012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:23:27 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 71.13s 9.29s % Output : CNFRefutation 71.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SEU012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 19:56:22 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y % 0.13/0.38 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. % 0.13/0.38 # % 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 69 Number of unprocessed: 69 % 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.38 # 69 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 7 conjectures. % 0.13/0.38 # There are 7 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.38 # Found 31 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.38 # 7 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.38 # 38 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.38 # 31 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.13/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 7 % 0.13/0.38 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.13/0.38 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on % 15.10/2.27 # Creating equality axioms % 15.10/2.27 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 71.13/9.29 # There were 4 total branch saturation attempts. % 71.13/9.29 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 71.13/9.29 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 71.13/9.29 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 71.13/9.29 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 71.13/9.29 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 71.13/9.29 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 71.13/9.29 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 71.13/9.29 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 71.13/9.29 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 71.13/9.29 # Begin clausification derivation % 71.13/9.29 % 71.13/9.29 # End clausification derivation % 71.13/9.29 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (empty(esk6_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (empty(esk8_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (function(esk5_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_63, negated_conjecture, (function(esk14_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (function(esk15_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (relation(empty_set))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (relation(empty_set))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (relation(esk5_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (relation(esk6_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (relation(esk9_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (relation(esk12_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk14_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk15_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (relation_empty_yielding(empty_set))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (relation_empty_yielding(esk12_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (~empty(esk9_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (~empty(esk11_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (relation_rng(esk14_0)=relation_dom(esk15_0))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (empty(esk10_1(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (function(identity_relation(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (relation(identity_relation(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (relation(identity_relation(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (relation_composition(esk14_0,esk15_0)=esk14_0)). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (function(X1)|~empty(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (relation(X1)|~empty(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (identity_relation(relation_dom(esk15_0))!=esk15_0)). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (subset(X1,X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~empty(powerset(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (empty(relation_rng(X1))|~empty(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (empty(relation_dom(X1))|~empty(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (relation(relation_rng(X1))|~empty(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (relation(relation_dom(X1))|~empty(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (element(esk4_1(X1),X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (empty(X1)|~empty(esk7_1(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (element(esk10_1(X1),powerset(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (relation_dom(X1)=X2|X1!=identity_relation(X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (empty(X1)|~relation(X1)|~empty(relation_rng(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (empty(X1)|~relation(X1)|~empty(relation_dom(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (~empty(X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (empty(X1)|element(esk7_1(X1),powerset(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (element(X1,powerset(X2))|~subset(X1,X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X1)|~relation(X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~empty(X1)|~relation(X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~element(X1,powerset(X2)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (function(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~function(X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~function(X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (apply(X3,X1)=X1|X3!=identity_relation(X2)|~function(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(X1,X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (~empty(X3)|~in(X1,X2)|~element(X2,powerset(X3)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (X2=identity_relation(X1)|in(esk13_2(X1,X2),X1)|relation_dom(X2)!=X1|~function(X2)|~relation(X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (element(X1,X3)|~in(X1,X2)|~element(X2,powerset(X3)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (in(X3,X4)|X4!=relation_rng(X2)|X3!=apply(X2,X1)|~function(X2)|~relation(X2)|~in(X1,relation_dom(X2)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(esk3_2(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))|~function(X1)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (X1=identity_relation(X2)|relation_dom(X1)!=X2|apply(X1,esk13_2(X2,X1))!=esk13_2(X2,X1)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|apply(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2))=esk2_2(X1,X2)|in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3)=apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))|~function(X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~in(X3,relation_dom(X1)))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X2=relation_rng(X1)|esk2_2(X1,X2)!=apply(X1,X3)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(X3,relation_dom(X1))|~in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (apply(X2,esk1_3(X2,X3,X1))=X1|X3!=relation_rng(X2)|~function(X2)|~relation(X2)|~in(X1,X3))). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))|X2!=relation_rng(X1)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(X3,X2))). % 71.13/9.29 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 71.13/9.29 # Begin printing tableau % 71.13/9.29 # Found 5 steps % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk14_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (relation(esk14_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_330470, plain, (~empty(empty_set)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_330469, plain, (empty(relation_composition(esk14_0,empty_set))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_67])). % 71.13/9.29 cnf(i_0_330472, plain, (relation_composition(esk14_0,empty_set)=empty_set), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_330472, ...])). % 71.13/9.29 # End printing tableau % 71.13/9.29 # SZS output end % 71.13/9.29 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 71.13/9.30 # Child (17909) has found a proof. % 71.13/9.30 % 71.13/9.30 # Proof search is over... % 71.13/9.30 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------