↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:23:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  182 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   23 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  237 (  95   ~;  98   |;  27   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   0 sgn  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t47_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( function(X2)
            & relation(X2) )
         => ( ( subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_dom(X1))
              & one_to_one(relation_composition(X2,X1)) )
           => one_to_one(X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t47_funct_1) ).

fof(t46_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
         => ( subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
           => relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_dom(X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t46_relat_1) ).

fof(t23_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( ( function(X3)
            & relation(X3) )
         => ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
           => apply(relation_composition(X2,X3),X1) = apply(X3,apply(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).

fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ( one_to_one(X1)
      <=> ! [X2,X3] :
            ( ( apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3)
              & in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
              & in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) )
           => X2 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2)
        & function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ( function(relation_composition(X1,X2))
        & relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1) ).

fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & relation(X1) )
     => relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( function(X1)
          & relation(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ( function(X2)
              & relation(X2) )
           => ( ( subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_dom(X1))
                & one_to_one(relation_composition(X2,X1)) )
             => one_to_one(X2) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t47_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X48,X49] :
      ( relation_dom(relation_composition(X48,X49)) = relation_dom(X48)
      | ~ subset(relation_rng(X48),relation_dom(X49))
      | ~ relation(X49)
      | ~ relation(X48) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t46_relat_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ one_to_one(esk13_0)
    & subset(relation_rng(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk12_0))
    & one_to_one(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    & function(esk13_0)
    & relation(esk13_0)
    & function(esk12_0)
    & relation(esk12_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43] :
      ( apply(relation_composition(X42,X43),X41) = apply(X43,apply(X42,X41))
      | ~ in(X41,relation_dom(X42))
      | ~ function(X43)
      | ~ relation(X43)
      | ~ function(X42)
      | ~ relation(X42) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t23_funct_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10] :
      ( ( ~ function(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | one_to_one(X8)
        | esk1_1(X8) != esk2_1(X8) )
      & ( ~ function(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | one_to_one(X8)
        | apply(X8,esk1_1(X8)) = apply(X8,esk2_1(X8)) )
      & ( ~ function(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | one_to_one(X8)
        | in(esk2_1(X8),relation_dom(X8)) )
      & ( ~ function(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | one_to_one(X8)
        | in(esk1_1(X8),relation_dom(X8)) )
      & ( ~ function(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | X9 = X10
        | apply(X8,X9) != apply(X8,X10)
        | ~ in(X10,relation_dom(X8))
        | ~ in(X9,relation_dom(X8))
        | ~ one_to_one(X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_dom(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_rng(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk12_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk12_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | apply(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk2_1(X1),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | apply(X1,X2) != apply(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ one_to_one(X1)
    | X2 = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)) = relation_dom(esk13_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | one_to_one(X2)
    | apply(X1,apply(X2,esk1_1(X2))) = apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),esk2_1(X2)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk1_1(X1),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | apply(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0),X1) != apply(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0),X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),esk2_1(X1)) = apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),esk1_1(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk12_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ in(esk2_1(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | apply(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk1_1(esk13_0)) != apply(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0),X1)
    | esk2_1(esk13_0) = X1 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_1(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ in(esk2_1(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | esk2_1(esk13_0) = esk1_1(esk13_0) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_1(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | esk2_1(esk13_0) = esk1_1(esk13_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_17]),c_0_14]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1)
    | one_to_one(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | esk2_1(esk13_0) = esk1_1(esk13_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_22]),c_0_14]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ( ~ function(X20)
        | ~ relation(X20)
        | ~ function(X19)
        | ~ relation(X19)
        | function(relation_composition(X19,X20)) )
      & ( ~ function(X20)
        | ~ relation(X20)
        | ~ function(X19)
        | ~ relation(X19)
        | relation(relation_composition(X19,X20)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_14]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] :
      ( relation(relation_composition(X13,X14))
      | ~ relation(X14)
      | ~ relation(X13) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:50:21 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 693318 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.22/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.63  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 693326 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.22/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.22/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.63  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  % Proof found!
% 0.22/0.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 37
% 0.22/0.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Initial clauses                      : 62
% 0.22/0.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 62
% 0.22/0.63  % Processed clauses                    : 514
% 0.22/0.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 7
% 0.22/0.63  % ...subsumed                          : 306
% 0.22/0.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 201
% 0.22/0.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 30
% 0.22/0.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.22/0.63  % Generated clauses                    : 1557
% 0.22/0.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1466
% 0.22/0.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 32
% 0.22/0.63  % Paramodulations                      : 1550
% 0.22/0.63  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.22/0.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 572
% 0.22/0.63  % ...of those cached                   : 545
% 0.22/0.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 161
% 0.22/0.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 27
% 0.22/0.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 0.22/0.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 123
% 0.22/0.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 892
% 0.22/0.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 6992
% 0.22/0.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 40
% 0.22/0.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7232
% 0.22/0.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2885
% 0.22/0.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 251
% 0.22/0.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 270
% 0.22/0.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.22/0.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.22/0.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 31431
% 0.22/0.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 637
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.63  % User time                : 0.099 s
% 0.22/0.63  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.63  % Total time               : 0.114 s
% 0.22/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 3408 pages
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.63  % User time                : 0.413 s
% 0.22/0.63  % System time              : 0.040 s
% 0.22/0.63  % Total time               : 0.453 s
% 0.22/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.22/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------