%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU017+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 71.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 53 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 248 ( 71 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 319 ( 124 ~; 129 |; 45 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 96 ( 5 sgn 54 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t50_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( ( relation_dom(X2) = X1
& relation_dom(X3) = X1
& subset(relation_rng(X3),X1)
& one_to_one(X2)
& relation_composition(X3,X2) = X2 )
=> X3 = identity_relation(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t50_funct_1) ).
fof(t7_boole,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
~ ( in(X1,X2)
& empty(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t7_boole) ).
fof(t34_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ( relation_dom(X2) = X1
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> apply(X2,X3) = X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t34_funct_1) ).
fof(t3_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( element(X1,powerset(X2))
<=> subset(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t3_subset) ).
fof(t4_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( in(X1,X2)
& element(X2,powerset(X3)) )
=> element(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t4_subset) ).
fof(d5_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
& X3 = apply(X1,X4) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_funct_1) ).
fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
<=> ! [X2,X3] :
( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
& in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3) )
=> X2 = X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d8_funct_1) ).
fof(t23_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
=> apply(relation_composition(X2,X3),X1) = apply(X3,apply(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t23_funct_1) ).
fof(t2_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( element(X1,X2)
=> ( empty(X2)
| in(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t2_subset) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( ( relation_dom(X2) = X1
& relation_dom(X3) = X1
& subset(relation_rng(X3),X1)
& one_to_one(X2)
& relation_composition(X3,X2) = X2 )
=> X3 = identity_relation(X1) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t50_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ in(X3,X4)
| ~ empty(X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_boole])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( relation_dom(X5) = X4
| X5 != identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X6,X4)
| apply(X5,X6) = X6
| X5 != identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( in(esk4_2(X4,X5),X4)
| relation_dom(X5) != X4
| X5 = identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( apply(X5,esk4_2(X4,X5)) != esk4_2(X4,X5)
| relation_dom(X5) != X4
| X5 = identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t34_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ element(X3,powerset(X4))
| subset(X3,X4) )
& ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
| element(X3,powerset(X4)) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk2_0)
& function(esk2_0)
& relation(esk3_0)
& function(esk3_0)
& relation_dom(esk2_0) = esk1_0
& relation_dom(esk3_0) = esk1_0
& subset(relation_rng(esk3_0),esk1_0)
& one_to_one(esk2_0)
& relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0
& esk3_0 != identity_relation(esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ empty(X1)
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = identity_relation(X2)
| in(esk4_2(X2,X1),X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_dom(X1) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ in(X4,X5)
| ~ element(X5,powerset(X6))
| element(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_subset])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( element(X1,powerset(X2))
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
subset(relation_rng(esk3_0),esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( X1 = identity_relation(X2)
| relation_dom(X1) != X2
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ empty(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom(esk3_0) = esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
function(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X5))
| ~ in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( X7 = apply(X5,esk7_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X9,relation_dom(X5))
| X7 != apply(X5,X9)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk8_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(X11,relation_dom(X5))
| esk8_2(X5,X6) != apply(X5,X11)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( in(esk9_2(X5,X6),relation_dom(X5))
| in(esk8_2(X5,X6),X6)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( esk8_2(X5,X6) = apply(X5,esk9_2(X5,X6))
| in(esk8_2(X5,X6),X6)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ one_to_one(X4)
| ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X4))
| ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X4))
| apply(X4,X5) != apply(X4,X6)
| X5 = X6
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( in(esk5_1(X4),relation_dom(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( in(esk6_1(X4),relation_dom(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( apply(X4,esk5_1(X4)) = apply(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( esk5_1(X4) != esk6_1(X4)
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X5))
| apply(relation_composition(X5,X6),X4) = apply(X6,apply(X5,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t23_funct_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ element(X3,X4)
| empty(X4)
| in(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( element(X1,X2)
| ~ element(X3,powerset(X2))
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
element(relation_rng(esk3_0),powerset(esk1_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 != identity_relation(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( identity_relation(X1) = esk3_0
| esk1_0 != X1
| ~ empty(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| X3 != apply(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( X2 = X3
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(X1,X2) != apply(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
function(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom(esk2_0) = esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| empty(X2)
| ~ element(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( element(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
~ empty(esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( in(apply(X1,X2),X3)
| X3 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| apply(esk2_0,X1) != apply(esk2_0,X2)
| ~ in(X2,esk1_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_36])]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( apply(esk2_0,apply(esk3_0,X1)) = apply(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_34]),c_0_21]),c_0_35]),c_0_22]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(esk3_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = apply(esk3_0,X2)
| apply(esk2_0,X1) != apply(esk2_0,X2)
| ~ in(apply(esk3_0,X2),esk1_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ in(X2,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
( in(apply(esk3_0,X1),esk1_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( X1 = identity_relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_dom(X1) != X2
| apply(X1,esk4_2(X2,X1)) != esk4_2(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( apply(esk3_0,X1) = X1
| ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
( identity_relation(X1) = esk3_0
| esk1_0 != X1
| ~ in(esk4_2(X1,esk3_0),esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_15]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU017+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 07:10:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.34/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.46/46.44 eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.46/46.44
% 0.46/46.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.46/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/69.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/69.46 eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/69.46
% 0.56/69.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/71.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/71.74
% 0.57/71.74 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/71.74 # OLD status Res
% 0.57/71.74 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.57/71.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.57/71.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/71.74
% 0.57/71.74 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/71.74 # OLD status Res
% 0.57/71.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.57/71.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/71.74
% 0.57/71.74 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/71.74 # OLD status Res
% 0.57/71.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 0.57/71.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/71.74 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.57/71.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.57/71.74
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof found!
% 0.57/71.74 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.57/71.74 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object total steps : 53
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object clause steps : 34
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object formula steps : 19
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object conjectures : 25
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object clause conjectures : 22
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object initial clauses used : 19
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object generating inferences : 15
% 0.57/71.74 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 29
% 0.57/71.74 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.57/71.74 # Parsed axioms : 40
% 0.57/71.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.57/71.74 # Initial clauses : 68
% 0.57/71.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.57/71.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 68
% 0.57/71.74 # Processed clauses : 5854
% 0.57/71.74 # ...of these trivial : 42
% 0.57/71.74 # ...subsumed : 3763
% 0.57/71.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 2049
% 0.57/71.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 337
% 0.57/71.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/71.74 # Backward-subsumed : 156
% 0.57/71.74 # Backward-rewritten : 214
% 0.57/71.74 # Generated clauses : 77969
% 0.57/71.74 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 73292
% 0.57/71.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4549
% 0.57/71.74 # Paramodulations : 76342
% 0.57/71.74 # Factorizations : 6
% 0.57/71.74 # Equation resolutions : 628
% 0.57/71.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 1676
% 0.57/71.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 172
% 0.57/71.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/71.74 # Negative unit clauses : 68
% 0.57/71.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 1436
% 0.57/71.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61194
% 0.57/71.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 586557
% 0.57/71.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/71.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 370
% 0.57/71.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1715668
% 0.57/71.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 178580
% 0.57/71.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7763
% 0.57/71.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71876
% 0.57/71.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/71.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 160
% 0.57/71.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 142
% 0.57/71.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/71.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/71.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2152701
% 0.57/71.74
% 0.57/71.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/71.74 # User time : 1.953 s
% 0.57/71.74 # System time : 0.045 s
% 0.57/71.74 # Total time : 1.998 s
% 0.57/71.74 # Maximum resident set size: 71192 pages
% 0.57/92.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/92.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/92.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/92.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/92.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/92.54 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/92.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/92.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/92.56 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------