↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU019+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:44:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 10.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  144 (  45 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   23 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  165 (  65   ~;  76   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   2 sgn  22   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ( one_to_one(A)
      <=> ! [B,C] :
            ( ( apply(A,B) = apply(A,C)
              & in(C,relation_dom(A))
              & in(B,relation_dom(A)) )
           => B = C ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

fof(fc2_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( function(identity_relation(A))
      & relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1) ).

fof(t34_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( function(B)
        & relation(B) )
     => ( B = identity_relation(A)
      <=> ( ! [C] :
              ( in(C,A)
             => apply(B,C) = C )
          & relation_dom(B) = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).

fof(t52_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [A] : one_to_one(identity_relation(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t52_funct_1) ).

fof(t52_funct_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] : one_to_one(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t52_funct_1]) ).

fof(nnf_4,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( ( ? [B,C] :
              ( C != B
              & apply(A,C) = apply(A,B)
              & in(C,relation_dom(A))
              & in(B,relation_dom(A)) )
          | one_to_one(A) )
        & ( ! [X0,X1] :
              ( X1 = X0
              | apply(A,X1) != apply(A,X0)
              | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(A))
              | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(A)) )
          | ~ one_to_one(A) ) )
      | ~ function(A)
      | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1]) ).

fof(sk_d8_funct_1_sk,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( ( ( sK1(A) != sK0(A)
            & apply(A,sK1(A)) = apply(A,sK0(A))
            & in(sK1(A),relation_dom(A))
            & in(sK0(A),relation_dom(A)) )
          | one_to_one(A) )
        & ( ! [X0,X1] :
              ( X1 = X0
              | apply(A,X1) != apply(A,X0)
              | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(A))
              | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(A)) )
          | ~ one_to_one(A) ) )
      | ~ function(A)
      | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(B,sK0(A)),skolemize(C,sK1(A))],[nnf_4]) ).

fof(sk_d8_funct_1,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0] :
        ( sK1(VAR_0) != sK0(VAR_0)
        | one_to_one(VAR_0)
        | ~ function(VAR_0)
        | ~ relation(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( apply(VAR_0,sK1(VAR_0)) = apply(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_0))
        | one_to_one(VAR_0)
        | ~ function(VAR_0)
        | ~ relation(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( in(sK1(VAR_0),relation_dom(VAR_0))
        | one_to_one(VAR_0)
        | ~ function(VAR_0)
        | ~ relation(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( in(sK0(VAR_0),relation_dom(VAR_0))
        | one_to_one(VAR_0)
        | ~ function(VAR_0)
        | ~ relation(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( VAR_2 = VAR_1
        | apply(VAR_0,VAR_2) != apply(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ in(VAR_2,relation_dom(VAR_0))
        | ~ in(VAR_1,relation_dom(VAR_0))
        | ~ one_to_one(VAR_0)
        | ~ function(VAR_0)
        | ~ relation(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d8_funct_1_sk]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    ( in(sK0(A),relation_dom(A))
    | one_to_one(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d8_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    ( in(sK1(A),relation_dom(A))
    | one_to_one(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d8_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    ( apply(A,sK1(A)) = apply(A,sK0(A))
    | one_to_one(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d8_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    ( sK1(A) != sK0(A)
    | one_to_one(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d8_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    function(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[fc2_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    ( relation_dom(A) = B
    | identity_relation(B) != A
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t34_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    ( apply(A,C) = C
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | identity_relation(B) != A
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t34_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    ( apply(identity_relation(A),C) = C
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | identity_relation(B) != identity_relation(A)
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( relation_dom(identity_relation(A)) = B
    | identity_relation(B) != identity_relation(A)
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( in(sK0(identity_relation(A)),relation_dom(identity_relation(A)))
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    ( in(sK1(identity_relation(A)),relation_dom(identity_relation(A)))
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_68,plain,
    ( apply(identity_relation(A),sK1(identity_relation(A))) = apply(identity_relation(A),sK0(identity_relation(A)))
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    ( sK1(identity_relation(A)) != sK0(identity_relation(A))
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_37]) ).

fof(nnf_31,plain,
    ? [A] : ~ one_to_one(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t52_funct_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t52_funct_1_neg,plain,
    ~ one_to_one(identity_relation(sK2)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(A,sK2)],[nnf_31]) ).

cnf(c_75,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(identity_relation(sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t52_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    relation(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[fc2_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_114,plain,
    ( sK1(identity_relation(A)) != sK0(identity_relation(A))
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_69]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    ( apply(identity_relation(A),sK1(identity_relation(A))) = apply(identity_relation(A),sK0(identity_relation(A)))
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_68]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    ( in(sK1(identity_relation(A)),relation_dom(identity_relation(A)))
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_117,plain,
    ( in(sK0(identity_relation(A)),relation_dom(identity_relation(A)))
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_119,plain,
    ( relation_dom(identity_relation(B)) = A
    | identity_relation(A) != identity_relation(B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_120,plain,
    ( apply(identity_relation(B),C) = C
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | identity_relation(A) != identity_relation(B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_198,negated_conjecture,
    sK1(identity_relation(sK2)) != sK0(identity_relation(sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_75]) ).

cnf(c_199,plain,
    apply(identity_relation(sK2),sK1(identity_relation(sK2))) = apply(identity_relation(sK2),sK0(identity_relation(sK2))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_75]) ).

cnf(c_216,plain,
    relation_dom(identity_relation(A)) = A,
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_119]) ).

cnf(c_236,plain,
    ( in(sK0(identity_relation(A)),A)
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_117]) ).

cnf(c_237,plain,
    ( in(sK1(identity_relation(A)),A)
    | one_to_one(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_116]) ).

cnf(c_238,plain,
    ( apply(identity_relation(B),A) = A
    | ~ in(A,B) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_120]) ).

cnf(c_510,plain,
    ( one_to_one(identity_relation(A))
    | apply(identity_relation(A),sK1(identity_relation(A))) = sK1(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_238,c_237]) ).

cnf(c_511,plain,
    ( one_to_one(identity_relation(A))
    | apply(identity_relation(A),sK0(identity_relation(A))) = sK0(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_238,c_236]) ).

cnf(c_2118,negated_conjecture,
    apply(identity_relation(sK2),sK1(identity_relation(sK2))) = sK1(identity_relation(sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_510,c_75]) ).

cnf(c_2102,negated_conjecture,
    apply(identity_relation(sK2),sK0(identity_relation(sK2))) = sK1(identity_relation(sK2)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_2118]) ).

cnf(c_2119,negated_conjecture,
    apply(identity_relation(sK2),sK0(identity_relation(sK2))) = sK0(identity_relation(sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_511,c_75]) ).

cnf(c_2120,negated_conjecture,
    sK1(identity_relation(sK2)) = sK0(identity_relation(sK2)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2102,c_2119]) ).

cnf(c_2117,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_2120]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU019+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/10.38  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/10.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/10.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/10.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/10.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/10.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/10.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/10.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:31:16 UTC 2026
% 0.11/10.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/10.39  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/10.39  % Process 857223 was started by sandbox2 on n019,
% 0.11/10.39  % Sat Sep 26 08:31:16 2026
% 0.11/10.39  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/10.40  
% 0.15/10.40  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/10.75  
% 0.15/10.75  % given #500 (F,wt=29): 635 -in(f4(c4),f4(f4(powerset(empty_set)))).  [ur(157,a,175,a,c,522,a)].
% 0.15/10.75  
% 0.15/10.75  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/10.75  
% 0.15/10.75  % Proof 1 at 0.26 (+ 0.07) seconds.
% 0.15/10.75  % Length of proof is 35.
% 0.15/10.75  % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.15/10.75  % Maximum clause weight is 39.000.
% 0.15/10.75  % Given clauses 667.
% 0.15/10.75  
% 0.15/10.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------