↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU020+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:44:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  100 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  109 (  41   ~;  36   |;  22   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   1 sgn   8   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t27_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ! [B] :
          ( ( function(B)
            & relation(B) )
         => ( relation_dom(relation_composition(B,A)) = relation_dom(B)
           => subset(relation_rng(B),relation_dom(A)) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t27_funct_1) ).

fof(t47_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ! [B] :
          ( ( function(B)
            & relation(B) )
         => ( ( subset(relation_rng(B),relation_dom(A))
              & one_to_one(relation_composition(B,A)) )
           => one_to_one(B) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t47_funct_1) ).

fof(t52_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] : one_to_one(identity_relation(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t52_funct_1) ).

fof(t71_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation_rng(identity_relation(A)) = A
      & relation_dom(identity_relation(A)) = A ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t71_relat_1) ).

fof(t53_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ( ? [B] :
            ( relation_composition(A,B) = identity_relation(relation_dom(A))
            & function(B)
            & relation(B) )
       => one_to_one(A) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t53_funct_1) ).

fof(t53_funct_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( ( function(A)
          & relation(A) )
       => ( ? [B] :
              ( relation_composition(A,B) = identity_relation(relation_dom(A))
              & function(B)
              & relation(B) )
         => one_to_one(A) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t53_funct_1]) ).

fof(nnf_39,plain,
    ? [A] :
      ( ~ one_to_one(A)
      & ? [B] :
          ( identity_relation(relation_dom(A)) = relation_composition(A,B)
          & function(B)
          & relation(B) )
      & function(A)
      & relation(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t53_funct_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t53_funct_1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ one_to_one(sK0)
    & identity_relation(relation_dom(sK0)) = relation_composition(sK0,sK1)
    & function(sK1)
    & relation(sK1)
    & function(sK0)
    & relation(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_39]) ).

cnf(c_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t53_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_41,negated_conjecture,
    identity_relation(relation_dom(sK0)) = relation_composition(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t53_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t53_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t53_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_44,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t53_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t53_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    relation_dom(identity_relation(A)) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t71_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    one_to_one(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t52_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ( one_to_one(B)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(B),relation_dom(A))
    | ~ one_to_one(relation_composition(B,A))
    | ~ function(B)
    | ~ relation(B)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t47_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(B),relation_dom(A))
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(B,A)) != relation_dom(B)
    | ~ function(B)
    | ~ relation(B)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t27_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    relation_dom(relation_composition(sK0,sK1)) = relation_dom(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_104,plain,
    one_to_one(relation_composition(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_52]) ).

cnf(c_270,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(relation_rng(A),relation_dom(sK1))
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(A,sK1)) != relation_dom(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A)
    | ~ relation(sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_106,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(relation_rng(A),relation_dom(sK1))
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(A,sK1)) != relation_dom(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_270]) ).

cnf(c_271,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(A)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(A),relation_dom(sK1))
    | ~ one_to_one(relation_composition(A,sK1))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A)
    | ~ function(sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_272,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(A)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(A),relation_dom(sK1))
    | ~ one_to_one(relation_composition(A,sK1))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_271,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_273,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(sK0)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(sK0),relation_dom(sK1))
    | ~ one_to_one(relation_composition(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ function(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_272,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_274,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(sK0)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(sK0),relation_dom(sK1))
    | ~ one_to_one(relation_composition(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_273,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_275,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(sK0)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(sK0),relation_dom(sK1)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_104]) ).

cnf(c_237,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_rng(sK0),relation_dom(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_275,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_276,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(relation_rng(sK0),relation_dom(sK1))
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(sK0,sK1)) != relation_dom(sK0)
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_277,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(relation_rng(sK0),relation_dom(sK1))
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(sK0,sK1)) != relation_dom(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_45,c_276]) ).

cnf(c_278,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_rng(sK0),relation_dom(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_277]) ).

cnf(c_269,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_237,c_278]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU020+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:30:36 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.35  % Process 148713 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.08/0.35  % Sat Sep 26 08:30:36 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.12/0.39  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.12/0.39  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.12/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 35.000.
% 0.12/0.39  % Given clauses 75.
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------