↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU023+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:18:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.43s 0.58s
% Output   : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (   8 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | relation(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | function(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

cnf(44,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | ~ in(Z,relation_dom(X))
    | apply(relation_composition(X,Y),Z) = apply(Y,apply(X,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | Y != function_inverse(X)
    | ~ in(Z,relation_dom(X))
    | U != apply(X,Z)
    | Z = apply(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t54_funct_1) ).

cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t56_funct_1) ).

cnf(60,negated_conjecture,
    function('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t56_funct_1) ).

cnf(61,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t56_funct_1) ).

cnf(62,negated_conjecture,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV14',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t56_funct_1) ).

cnf(63,negated_conjecture,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV14' != apply(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV15'),apply('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV14'))
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV14' != apply(relation_composition('SKOLEMAAAV15',function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV15')),'SKOLEMAAAV14') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t56_funct_1) ).

cnf(97,plain,
    relation(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,59,60]) ).

cnf(100,plain,
    function(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,59,60]) ).

cnf(267,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV14' = apply(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV15'),apply('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV14')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[53,100,59,60,61,97,62,theory(equality),theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(268,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV14' != apply(relation_composition('SKOLEMAAAV15',function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV15')),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[63,267,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(269,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[44,100,59,60,97,62]),268,267,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SEU023+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 23:22:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  "."
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T23:22:04
% 0.20/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n023.cluster.edu at 2022-06-18T23:22:04
% 0.20/0.49  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.49     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.43/0.58  
% 0.43/0.58  
% 0.43/0.58  #||
% 0.43/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.58  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.43/0.58  ||#
% 0.43/0.58  
% 0.43/0.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.43/0.59  ;       671 formulas have been input or derived (from 86 formulas).
% 0.43/0.59  ;       269 (40%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.43/0.59  ;           22 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.43/0.59  ;          247 (92%) are still being kept.
% 0.43/0.59  ; 
% 0.43/0.59  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.008   7%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.003   3%   Assert                       (40 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.016  15%   Process new row              (634 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.046  42%   Resolution                   (170 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (85 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (1 call)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.002   2%   Condensing                   (45 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Forward subsumption          (45 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.002   2%   Backward subsumption         (44 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (12 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.003   3%   Forward simplification       (505 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Backward simplification      (269 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Ordering                     (47 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.025  23%   Other
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.109        Total
% 0.43/0.59  ;     0.113        Real time
% 0.43/0.59  ; 
% 0.43/0.59  ; Term-hash-array has 421 terms in all.
% 0.43/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 43 entries (44 at peak, 44 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.43/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 158 nodes (174 at peak, 174 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.43/0.59  ;  Retrieved 9 possibly forward subsuming rows in 45 calls.
% 0.43/0.59  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly backward subsumed rows in 44 calls.
% 0.43/0.59  ; Path-index has 411 entries (411 at peak, 434 added, 23 deleted).
% 0.43/0.59  ; Path-index has 467 nodes (467 at peak, 492 added, 25 deleted).
% 0.43/0.59  ; Trie-index has 411 entries (411 at peak, 434 added, 23 deleted).
% 0.43/0.59  ; Trie-index has 696 nodes (696 at peak, 737 added, 41 deleted).
% 0.43/0.59  ; Retrieved 243 generalization terms in 579 calls.
% 0.43/0.59  ; Retrieved 231 instance terms in 224 calls.
% 0.43/0.59  ; Retrieved 48,272 unifiable terms in 8,393 calls.
% 0.43/0.59  ; 
% 0.43/0.59  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.43/0.59  ;     1 with value 12
% 0.43/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to give has 171 entries:
% 0.43/0.59  ;     4 with value (4 6)          55 with value (4 10)           1 with value (4 13)
% 0.43/0.59  ;    65 with value (4 7)          16 with value (4 11)           3 with value (4 15)
% 0.43/0.59  ;    14 with value (4 8)           4 with value (4 12)           1 with value (4 16)
% 0.43/0.59  ;     8 with value (4 9)
% 0.43/0.59  Evaluation took:
% 0.43/0.59    0.113 seconds of real time
% 0.43/0.59    0.101698 seconds of user run time
% 0.43/0.59    0.011062 seconds of system run time
% 0.43/0.59    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.43/0.59    0 page faults and
% 0.43/0.59    6,326,672 bytes consed.
% 0.43/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.43/0.59  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T23:22:04
% 0.43/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.43/0.59  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------