%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU026+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 92 ( 23 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 109 ( 45 ~; 38 |; 13 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 1 sgn 17 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t59_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)) = relation_rng(X1)
& relation_rng(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)) = relation_rng(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t59_funct_1) ).
fof(t47_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X2))
=> relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X1)) = relation_rng(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t47_relat_1) ).
fof(t46_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
=> relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_dom(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t46_relat_1) ).
fof(t55_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X1))
& relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t55_funct_1) ).
fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
fof(dt_k2_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( relation(function_inverse(X1))
& function(function_inverse(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k2_funct_1) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)) = relation_rng(X1)
& relation_rng(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)) = relation_rng(X1) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t59_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk12_0)
& function(esk12_0)
& one_to_one(esk12_0)
& ( relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk12_0),esk12_0)) != relation_rng(esk12_0)
| relation_rng(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk12_0),esk12_0)) != relation_rng(esk12_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ subset(relation_dom(X3),relation_rng(X4))
| relation_rng(relation_composition(X4,X3)) = relation_rng(X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t47_relat_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( relation_rng(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk12_0),esk12_0)) != relation_rng(esk12_0)
| relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk12_0),esk12_0)) != relation_rng(esk12_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_rng(X2)
| ~ subset(relation_dom(X2),relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk12_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_dom(X4))
| relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X4)) = relation_dom(X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t46_relat_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk12_0),esk12_0)) != relation_rng(esk12_0)
| ~ subset(relation_dom(esk12_0),relation_rng(function_inverse(esk12_0)))
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk12_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_dom(X1)
| ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( relation_rng(X2) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X2))
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) )
& ( relation_dom(X2) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X2))
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t55_funct_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X3] : subset(X3,X3),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(function_inverse(esk12_0)) != relation_rng(esk12_0)
| ~ subset(relation_dom(esk12_0),relation_rng(function_inverse(esk12_0)))
| ~ subset(relation_rng(function_inverse(esk12_0)),relation_dom(esk12_0))
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk12_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(esk12_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
function(esk12_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(function_inverse(esk12_0)) != relation_rng(esk12_0)
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk12_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_11]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( relation(function_inverse(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) )
& ( function(function_inverse(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_funct_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ relation(function_inverse(esk12_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_20]),c_0_11]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( relation(function_inverse(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_11]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SEU026+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:38:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.39 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.39
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object total steps : 28
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object conjectures : 12
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object clause conjectures : 9
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 16
% 0.22/1.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.39 # Parsed axioms : 41
% 0.22/1.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Initial clauses : 67
% 0.22/1.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.22/1.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 65
% 0.22/1.39 # Processed clauses : 74
% 0.22/1.39 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.22/1.39 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.22/1.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.22/1.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.22/1.39 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.22/1.39 # Generated clauses : 52
% 0.22/1.39 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 47
% 0.22/1.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.22/1.39 # Paramodulations : 52
% 0.22/1.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 61
% 0.22/1.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 0.22/1.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.22/1.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 36
% 0.22/1.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31
% 0.22/1.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 111
% 0.22/1.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.22/1.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 202
% 0.22/1.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 137
% 0.22/1.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.22/1.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.22/1.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.22/1.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.22/1.39 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3562
% 0.22/1.39
% 0.22/1.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.39 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.39 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.39 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.22/1.39 # Maximum resident set size: 2956 pages
% 0.22/23.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------