↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU030+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.07s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   22
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   97 (  48 unt;   9 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  373 ( 119 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  381 ( 164   ~; 156   |;  46   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  12 usr;  10 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn  57   !;   4   ?;  20   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( function(X2)
            & relation(X2) )
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ( function(X3)
                & relation(X3) )
             => ( ( relation_composition(X2,X3) = identity_relation(X0)
                  & relation_composition(X1,X2) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X3))
                  & relation_rng(X1) = X0 )
               => X3 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l72_funct_1) ).

fof(f37,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( one_to_one(X0)
       => ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
          & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( one_to_one(X0)
       => ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
          & relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t61_funct_1) ).

fof(f40,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ( function(X1)
            & relation(X1) )
         => ( ( relation_composition(X0,X1) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0))
              & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1)
              & one_to_one(X0) )
           => X1 = function_inverse(X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t63_funct_1) ).

fof(f41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ( function(X0)
          & relation(X0) )
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ( function(X1)
              & relation(X1) )
           => ( ( relation_composition(X0,X1) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0))
                & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1)
                & one_to_one(X0) )
             => X1 = function_inverse(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f40]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ! [X3] :
              ( ~ function(X3)
              | ~ relation(X3)
              | identity_relation(X0) != relation_composition(X2,X3)
              | relation_composition(X1,X2) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X3))
              | relation_rng(X1) != X0
              | X3 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ! [X3] :
              ( ~ function(X3)
              | ~ relation(X3)
              | identity_relation(X0) != relation_composition(X2,X3)
              | relation_composition(X1,X2) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X3))
              | relation_rng(X1) != X0
              | X3 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f70]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
        & relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
        & relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( function(X0)
      & relation(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( function(X1)
          & relation(X1)
          & relation_composition(X0,X1) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0))
          & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1)
          & one_to_one(X0)
          & function_inverse(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( function(X0)
      & relation(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( function(X1)
          & relation(X1)
          & relation_composition(X0,X1) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0))
          & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1)
          & one_to_one(X0)
          & function_inverse(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ( function(sK11)
    & relation(sK11)
    & function(sK12)
    & relation(sK12)
    & relation_composition(sK11,sK12) = identity_relation(relation_dom(sK11))
    & relation_rng(sK11) = relation_dom(sK12)
    & one_to_one(sK11)
    & sK12 != function_inverse(sK11) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK11,sK12]),skolemize(X0,sK11),skolemize(X1,sK12)],[f85]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | function(function_inverse(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(function_inverse(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ function(X3)
      | ~ relation(X3)
      | identity_relation(X0) != relation_composition(X2,X3)
      | relation_composition(X1,X2) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X3))
      | relation_rng(X1) != X0
      | X1 = X3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f80]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    function(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    relation(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f164,plain,
    function(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f165,plain,
    relation(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    relation_composition(sK11,sK12) = identity_relation(relation_dom(sK11)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    relation_rng(sK11) = relation_dom(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    one_to_one(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    sK12 != function_inverse(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f173,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ function(X3)
      | ~ relation(X3)
      | relation_composition(X2,X3) != identity_relation(relation_rng(X1))
      | relation_composition(X1,X2) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X3))
      | X1 = X3 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f132]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( relation(function_inverse(X0))
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( function(function_inverse(X0))
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

tcf(c_78,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X2 )
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(X1,X2) != identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) )
      | ( relation_composition(X0,X1) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X2)) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f173]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_rng(function_inverse(X0)) = relation_dom(X0) )
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).

tcf(c_106,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) )
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f161]) ).

tcf(c_107,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) )
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f160]) ).

tcf(c_108,negated_conjecture,
    function_inverse(sK11) != sK12,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f169]) ).

tcf(c_109,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f168]) ).

tcf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(sK12) = relation_rng(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

tcf(c_111,negated_conjecture,
    relation_composition(sK11,sK12) = identity_relation(relation_dom(sK11)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f166]) ).

tcf(c_112,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f165]) ).

tcf(c_113,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).

tcf(c_114,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163]) ).

tcf(c_115,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).

tcf(c_146,plain,
    ( ( relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_dom(sK11) )
    | ~ one_to_one(sK11)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_104]) ).

tcf(c_150,plain,
    ( ( relation_composition(function_inverse(sK11),sK11) = identity_relation(relation_rng(sK11)) )
    | ~ one_to_one(sK11)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_107]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ( ( relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(sK11)) )
    | ~ one_to_one(sK11)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).

tcf(c_703,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) )
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( X0 != sK11 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_109]) ).

tcf(c_704,plain,
    ( ( relation_composition(function_inverse(sK11),sK11) = identity_relation(relation_rng(sK11)) )
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_703]) ).

tcf(c_705,plain,
    relation_composition(function_inverse(sK11),sK11) = identity_relation(relation_rng(sK11)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_704,c_115,c_114,c_109,c_150]) ).

tcf(c_710,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) )
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( X0 != sK11 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_109]) ).

tcf(c_711,plain,
    ( ( relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(sK11)) )
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_710]) ).

tcf(c_712,plain,
    relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(sK11)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_711,c_115,c_114,c_109,c_151]) ).

tcf(c_717,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_rng(function_inverse(X0)) = relation_dom(X0) )
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( X0 != sK11 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_109]) ).

tcf(c_718,plain,
    ( ( relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_dom(sK11) )
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_717]) ).

tcf(c_719,plain,
    relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_dom(sK11),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_718,c_115,c_114,c_109,c_146]) ).

tcf(c_1040,plain,
    relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_composition(sK11,sK12),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_712,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_1041,plain,
    relation_composition(function_inverse(sK11),sK11) = identity_relation(relation_dom(sK12)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_705,c_110]) ).

tcf(c_1176,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = function_inverse(sK11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1177,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = relation_composition(iPr_def_10,sK11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1178,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = relation_dom(sK12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1179,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = identity_relation(iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1180,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = relation_composition(sK11,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1181,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = relation_composition(sK11,sK12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1183,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = relation_rng(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1184,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = relation_dom(sK11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1185,definition,
    iPr_def_19 = identity_relation(iPr_def_18),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_19])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1187,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1041,c_1178,c_1179,c_1176,c_1177]) ).

tcf(c_1188,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1040,c_1181,c_1180]) ).

tcf(c_1190,plain,
    iPr_def_17 = iPr_def_18,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_719,c_1184,c_1183]) ).

tcf(c_1191,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_115]) ).

tcf(c_1192,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_114]) ).

tcf(c_1193,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_113]) ).

tcf(c_1194,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).

tcf(c_1195,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_15 = iPr_def_19,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_1185]) ).

tcf(c_1197,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_10 != sK12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_108]) ).

tcf(c_1867,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = iPr_def_19,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1195,c_1188]) ).

tcf(c_1886,plain,
    identity_relation(iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1179,c_1187]) ).

tcf(c_1891,plain,
    identity_relation(iPr_def_17) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1185,c_1190,c_1867]) ).

tcf(c_2007,plain,
    relation_composition(sK11,sK12) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1181,c_1188]) ).

tcf(c_2111,plain,
    ( function(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1176,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_2112,plain,
    function(iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2111,c_1192,c_1191]) ).

tcf(c_2119,plain,
    ( relation(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1176,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_2120,plain,
    relation(iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2119,c_1192,c_1191]) ).

tcf(c_2670,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sK12 )
      | ~ relation(sK12)
      | ~ function(sK12)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(X1,sK12) != identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) )
      | ( relation_composition(X0,X1) != identity_relation(iPr_def_12) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1178,c_78]) ).

tcf(c_2701,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sK12 )
      | ~ relation(sK12)
      | ~ function(sK12)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(X1,sK12) != identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) )
      | ( relation_composition(X0,X1) != iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2670,c_1886]) ).

tcf(c_2702,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sK12 )
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(X1,sK12) != identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) )
      | ( relation_composition(X0,X1) != iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2701,c_1194,c_1193]) ).

tcf(c_2855,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK12 = iPr_def_10 )
      | ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
      | ~ function(iPr_def_10)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,X0) != iPr_def_11 )
      | ( relation_composition(X0,sK12) != identity_relation(iPr_def_17) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1183,c_2702]) ).

tcf(c_2864,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK12 = iPr_def_10 )
      | ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
      | ~ function(iPr_def_10)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,X0) != iPr_def_11 )
      | ( relation_composition(X0,sK12) != iPr_def_14 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2855,c_1891]) ).

tcf(c_2865,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK12 = iPr_def_10 )
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,X0) != iPr_def_11 )
      | ( relation_composition(X0,sK12) != iPr_def_14 ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2864,c_2120,c_2112]) ).

tcf(c_2960,plain,
    ( ( sK12 = iPr_def_10 )
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11)
    | ( relation_composition(sK11,sK12) != iPr_def_14 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1177,c_2865]) ).

tcf(c_2961,plain,
    ( ( sK12 = iPr_def_10 )
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ function(sK11) ),
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_2960,c_2007]) ).

tcf(c_2962,plain,
    sK12 = iPr_def_10,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2961,c_1192,c_1191]) ).

tcf(c_2974,plain,
    iPr_def_10 != iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1197,c_2962]) ).

tcf(c_2977,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_2974]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU030+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:39:26 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43  % Proving...
% 3.07/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.07/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.07/1.28  
% 3.07/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.07/1.28  
% 3.07/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.07/1.28  
% 3.07/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.07/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.07/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.07/1.28  
% 3.07/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.07/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.07/1.28  
% 3.07/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 3  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.07/1.28  
% 3.07/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.07/1.28  
% 3.07/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.07/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.07/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.07/1.28  
% 3.07/1.28  % 
% 3.07/1.28  % clauses                               80
% 3.07/1.28  % conjectures                           7
% 3.07/1.28  % EPR                                   35
% 3.07/1.28  % Horn                                  78
% 3.07/1.28  % unary                                 49
% 3.07/1.28  % binary                                16
% 3.07/1.28  % lits                                  134
% 3.07/1.29  % lits eq                               31
% 3.07/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.07/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.07/1.29  % fd_cond                               1
% 3.07/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 3.07/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  % ------ 
% 3.07/1.29  % Current options:
% 3.07/1.29  % ------ 
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  % 
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 3.07/1.29  % 
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.07/1.29  
% 3.07/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------