%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SEU032+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:06 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.03s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.03s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 19
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 79 ( 25 unt; 2 def)
% Number of atoms : 329 ( 74 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 326 ( 146 ~; 138 |; 28 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 14 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 0 sgn 41 !; 2 ?; 12 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( function(function_inverse(X0))
& relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).
fof(f36,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( one_to_one(X0)
=> ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).
fof(f38,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( one_to_one(X0)
=> ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
& relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t61_funct_1) ).
fof(f39,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( one_to_one(X0)
=> one_to_one(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t62_funct_1) ).
fof(f40,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( ( relation_composition(X0,X1) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0))
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1)
& one_to_one(X0) )
=> X1 = function_inverse(X0) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t63_funct_1) ).
fof(f41,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( one_to_one(X0)
=> function_inverse(function_inverse(X0)) = X0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_funct_1) ).
fof(f42,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( one_to_one(X0)
=> function_inverse(function_inverse(X0)) = X0 ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f41]) ).
fof(f55,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ( function(function_inverse(X0))
& relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ( function(function_inverse(X0))
& relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f55]) ).
fof(f78,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f78]) ).
fof(f81,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
& relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).
fof(f82,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
& relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f81]) ).
fof(f83,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| one_to_one(function_inverse(X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| one_to_one(function_inverse(X0)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_composition(X0,X1) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X0))
| relation_rng(X0) != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| X1 = function_inverse(X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).
fof(f86,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ! [X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_composition(X0,X1) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X0))
| relation_rng(X0) != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| X1 = function_inverse(X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f85]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
? [X0] :
( function(X0)
& relation(X0)
& one_to_one(X0)
& function_inverse(function_inverse(X0)) != X0 ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).
fof(f88,plain,
? [X0] :
( function(X0)
& relation(X0)
& one_to_one(X0)
& function_inverse(function_inverse(X0)) != X0 ),
inference(flattening,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
( function(sK11)
& relation(sK11)
& one_to_one(sK11)
& sK11 != function_inverse(function_inverse(sK11)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK11]),skolemize(X0,sK11)],[f88]) ).
fof(f110,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| function(function_inverse(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f111,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| relation(function_inverse(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f159,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).
fof(f160,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).
fof(f162,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).
fof(f163,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).
fof(f164,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| one_to_one(function_inverse(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).
fof(f165,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_composition(X0,X1) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X0))
| relation_rng(X0) != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| function_inverse(X0) = X1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).
fof(f166,plain,
function(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).
fof(f167,plain,
relation(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).
fof(f168,plain,
one_to_one(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).
fof(f169,plain,
sK11 != function_inverse(function_inverse(sK11)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).
tcf(c_53,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( relation(function_inverse(X0))
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( function(function_inverse(X0))
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).
tcf(c_102,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) = relation_rng(X0) )
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f160]) ).
tcf(c_103,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( relation_rng(function_inverse(X0)) = relation_dom(X0) )
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f159]) ).
tcf(c_105,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163]) ).
tcf(c_106,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0)) )
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
tcf(c_107,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( one_to_one(function_inverse(X0))
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).
tcf(c_108,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( function_inverse(X0) = X1 )
| ~ one_to_one(X0)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X0)
| ( relation_dom(X1) != relation_rng(X0) )
| ( relation_composition(X0,X1) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f165]) ).
tcf(c_109,negated_conjecture,
function_inverse(function_inverse(sK11)) != sK11,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f169]) ).
tcf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f168]) ).
tcf(c_111,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).
tcf(c_112,negated_conjecture,
function(sK11),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f166]) ).
tcf(c_1085,definition,
iPr_def_10 = function_inverse(sK11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1086,definition,
iPr_def_11 = function_inverse(iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1087,negated_conjecture,
function(sK11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).
tcf(c_1088,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_111]) ).
tcf(c_1089,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(sK11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_110]) ).
tcf(c_1090,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_11 != sK11,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_1085,c_1086]) ).
tcf(c_1888,plain,
( relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1085,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_1893,plain,
relation(iPr_def_10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1888,c_1088,c_1087]) ).
tcf(c_1903,plain,
( function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1085,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_1908,plain,
function(iPr_def_10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1903,c_1088,c_1087]) ).
tcf(c_2252,plain,
( one_to_one(iPr_def_10)
| ~ one_to_one(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1085,c_107]) ).
tcf(c_2257,plain,
one_to_one(iPr_def_10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2252,c_1089,c_1088,c_1087]) ).
tcf(c_2419,plain,
( ( relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_rng(sK11) )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1089,c_102]) ).
tcf(c_2423,plain,
( ( relation_dom(function_inverse(iPr_def_10)) = relation_rng(iPr_def_10) )
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2257,c_102]) ).
tcf(c_2427,plain,
( ( relation_dom(iPr_def_11) = relation_rng(iPr_def_10) )
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2423,c_1086]) ).
tcf(c_2428,plain,
relation_dom(iPr_def_11) = relation_rng(iPr_def_10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2427,c_1893,c_1908]) ).
tcf(c_2431,plain,
( ( relation_dom(iPr_def_10) = relation_rng(sK11) )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2419,c_1085]) ).
tcf(c_2432,plain,
relation_dom(iPr_def_10) = relation_rng(sK11),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2431,c_1088,c_1087]) ).
tcf(c_2474,plain,
( ( relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_dom(sK11) )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1089,c_103]) ).
tcf(c_2486,plain,
( ( relation_dom(sK11) = relation_dom(iPr_def_11) )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2474,c_1085,c_2428]) ).
tcf(c_2487,plain,
relation_dom(sK11) = relation_dom(iPr_def_11),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2486,c_1088,c_1087]) ).
tcf(c_2537,plain,
( ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,function_inverse(iPr_def_10)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(iPr_def_10)) )
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2257,c_105]) ).
tcf(c_2541,plain,
( ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = identity_relation(relation_dom(iPr_def_10)) )
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2537,c_1086]) ).
tcf(c_2542,plain,
relation_composition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = identity_relation(relation_dom(iPr_def_10)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2541,c_1893,c_1908]) ).
tcf(c_2593,plain,
( ( relation_composition(function_inverse(sK11),sK11) = identity_relation(relation_rng(sK11)) )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1089,c_106]) ).
tcf(c_2606,plain,
( ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,sK11) = relation_composition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2593,c_1085,c_2432,c_2542]) ).
tcf(c_2607,plain,
relation_composition(iPr_def_10,sK11) = relation_composition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2606,c_1088,c_1087]) ).
tcf(c_2872,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( function_inverse(iPr_def_10) = X0 )
| ~ one_to_one(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ( relation_dom(X0) != relation_rng(iPr_def_10) )
| ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,X0) != relation_composition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2542,c_108]) ).
tcf(c_2873,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = iPr_def_11 )
| ~ one_to_one(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(iPr_def_10)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ( relation_dom(X0) != relation_dom(iPr_def_11) )
| ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,X0) != relation_composition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) ) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2872,c_1086,c_2428]) ).
tcf(c_2874,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = iPr_def_11 )
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ( relation_dom(X0) != relation_dom(iPr_def_11) )
| ( relation_composition(iPr_def_10,X0) != relation_composition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) ) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2873,c_2257,c_1893,c_1908]) ).
tcf(c_2898,plain,
( ( sK11 = iPr_def_11 )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11)
| ( relation_dom(sK11) != relation_dom(iPr_def_11) ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2607,c_2874]) ).
tcf(c_2900,plain,
( ( sK11 = iPr_def_11 )
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ function(sK11) ),
inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_2898,c_2487]) ).
tcf(c_2901,plain,
sK11 = iPr_def_11,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2900,c_1088,c_1087]) ).
tcf(c_2909,plain,
iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_11,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1090,c_2901]) ).
tcf(c_2913,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_2909]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SEU032+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.18/0.45 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:35:51 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.18/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.52
% 0.23/0.52 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.23/0.52
% 0.23/0.52 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.23/0.54 % Proving...
% 4.03/1.42 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.03/1.42 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.03/1.42 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.03/1.42 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Parsing...
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Proving...
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 %
% 4.03/1.42 % clauses 63
% 4.03/1.42 % conjectures 4
% 4.03/1.42 % EPR 30
% 4.03/1.42 % Horn 61
% 4.03/1.42 % unary 30
% 4.03/1.42 % binary 13
% 4.03/1.42 % lits 128
% 4.03/1.42 % lits eq 12
% 4.03/1.42 % fd_pure 0
% 4.03/1.42 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.03/1.42 % fd_cond 1
% 4.03/1.42 % fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 4.03/1.42 % AC symbols 0
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------
% 4.03/1.42 % Current options:
% 4.03/1.42 % ------
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 %
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % ------ Proving...
% 4.03/1.42 %
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.03/1.42
% 4.03/1.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------