↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU034+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:44:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 5.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  134 (  47 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  158 (  72   ~;  67   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   5 sgn  10   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(dt_k2_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ( function(function_inverse(A))
        & relation(function_inverse(A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

fof(fc2_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( function(identity_relation(A))
      & relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1) ).

fof(t44_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ! [B] :
          ( ( function(B)
            & relation(B) )
         => ( ( relation_composition(A,B) = A
              & relation_rng(A) = relation_dom(B) )
           => B = identity_relation(relation_dom(B)) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t44_funct_1) ).

fof(t52_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] : one_to_one(identity_relation(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t52_funct_1) ).

fof(t55_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ( one_to_one(A)
       => ( relation_dom(A) = relation_rng(function_inverse(A))
          & relation_rng(A) = relation_dom(function_inverse(A)) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).

fof(t61_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ( one_to_one(A)
       => ( relation_composition(function_inverse(A),A) = identity_relation(relation_rng(A))
          & relation_composition(A,function_inverse(A)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(A)) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t61_funct_1) ).

fof(t71_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation_rng(identity_relation(A)) = A
      & relation_dom(identity_relation(A)) = A ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t71_relat_1) ).

fof(t67_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [A] : function_inverse(identity_relation(A)) = identity_relation(A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t67_funct_1) ).

fof(t67_funct_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] : function_inverse(identity_relation(A)) = identity_relation(A),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t67_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    ( relation_rng(A) = relation_dom(function_inverse(A))
    | ~ one_to_one(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t55_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    one_to_one(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t52_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ( identity_relation(relation_dom(A)) = relation_composition(A,function_inverse(A))
    | ~ one_to_one(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t61_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( identity_relation(relation_dom(identity_relation(A))) = relation_composition(identity_relation(A),function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(A),function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) = identity_relation(relation_dom(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ( relation_rng(identity_relation(A)) = relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_45,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    ( relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) = relation_rng(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

fof(nnf_44,plain,
    ? [A] : identity_relation(A) != function_inverse(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t67_funct_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t67_funct_1_neg,plain,
    identity_relation(sK0) != function_inverse(identity_relation(sK0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(A,sK0)],[nnf_44]) ).

cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    identity_relation(sK0) != function_inverse(identity_relation(sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t67_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
    function_inverse(identity_relation(sK0)) != identity_relation(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    relation_rng(identity_relation(A)) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t71_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    relation_dom(identity_relation(A)) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t71_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_87,plain,
    ( identity_relation(relation_dom(B)) = B
    | relation_composition(A,B) != A
    | relation_rng(A) != relation_dom(B)
    | ~ function(B)
    | ~ relation(B)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t44_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_118,plain,
    function(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[fc2_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_119,plain,
    relation(identity_relation(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[fc2_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_127,plain,
    ( function(function_inverse(A))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_128,plain,
    ( relation(function_inverse(A))
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_292,plain,
    ( relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) = A
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_293,plain,
    ( relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) = A
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_292]) ).

cnf(c_132,plain,
    relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) = A,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_293]) ).

cnf(c_294,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(A),function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) = identity_relation(A)
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_295,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(A),function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) = identity_relation(A)
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_294]) ).

cnf(c_135,plain,
    relation_composition(identity_relation(A),function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) = identity_relation(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_295]) ).

cnf(c_296,plain,
    ( function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_276,plain,
    function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_296]) ).

cnf(c_297,plain,
    ( relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_282,plain,
    relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_297]) ).

cnf(c_298,plain,
    ( identity_relation(relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))) = function_inverse(identity_relation(A))
    | relation_rng(identity_relation(A)) != relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_87]) ).

cnf(c_299,plain,
    ( identity_relation(relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))) = function_inverse(identity_relation(A))
    | A != relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_298]) ).

cnf(c_300,plain,
    ( identity_relation(relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))) = function_inverse(identity_relation(A))
    | A != A
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_299]) ).

cnf(c_301,plain,
    ( identity_relation(A) = function_inverse(identity_relation(A))
    | A != A
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_300]) ).

cnf(c_302,plain,
    ( function_inverse(identity_relation(A)) = identity_relation(A)
    | A != A
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_301]) ).

cnf(c_303,plain,
    ( function_inverse(identity_relation(A)) = identity_relation(A)
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A))
    | ~ relation(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_302]) ).

cnf(c_304,plain,
    ( function_inverse(identity_relation(A)) = identity_relation(A)
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_303]) ).

cnf(c_305,plain,
    ( function_inverse(identity_relation(A)) = identity_relation(A)
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A)))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_304]) ).

cnf(c_306,plain,
    ( function_inverse(identity_relation(A)) = identity_relation(A)
    | ~ function(function_inverse(identity_relation(A))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_282,c_305]) ).

cnf(c_290,plain,
    function_inverse(identity_relation(A)) = identity_relation(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_276,c_306]) ).

cnf(c_291,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_290,c_79]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU034+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/5.45  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.17/5.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/5.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/5.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/5.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/5.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/5.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/5.45  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:32:07 UTC 2026
% 0.17/5.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/5.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/5.45  % Process 2653702 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.17/5.45  % Sat Sep 26 08:32:07 2026
% 0.17/5.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/5.47  
% 0.17/5.47  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.21/5.52  
% 0.21/5.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/5.52  
% 0.21/5.52  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.21/5.52  % Length of proof is 30.
% 0.21/5.52  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.21/5.52  % Maximum clause weight is 38.000.
% 0.21/5.52  % Given clauses 59.
% 0.21/5.52  
% 0.21/5.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------