↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU034+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.66s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   69 (  36 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  229 (  67 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  206 (  94   ~;  87   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn  52   !;   1   ?;  21   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( function(identity_relation(X0))
      & relation(identity_relation(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ( function(X1)
            & relation(X1) )
         => ( ( relation_composition(X0,X1) = X0
              & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1) )
           => X1 = identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t44_funct_1) ).

fof(f37,axiom,
    ! [X0] : one_to_one(identity_relation(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t52_funct_1) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( one_to_one(X0)
       => ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
          & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( one_to_one(X0)
       => ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
          & relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t61_funct_1) ).

fof(f41,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : function_inverse(identity_relation(X0)) = identity_relation(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t67_funct_1) ).

fof(f42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : function_inverse(identity_relation(X0)) = identity_relation(X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f41]) ).

fof(f44,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation_rng(identity_relation(X0)) = X0
      & relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t71_relat_1) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ function(X1)
          | ~ relation(X1)
          | relation_composition(X0,X1) != X0
          | relation_rng(X0) != relation_dom(X1)
          | X1 = identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ function(X1)
          | ~ relation(X1)
          | relation_composition(X0,X1) != X0
          | relation_rng(X0) != relation_dom(X1)
          | X1 = identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f81]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
        & relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ( relation_composition(function_inverse(X0),X0) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X0))
        & relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ? [X0] : identity_relation(X0) != function_inverse(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    identity_relation(sK11) != function_inverse(identity_relation(sK11)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK11]),skolemize(X0,sK11)],[f86]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | function(function_inverse(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(function_inverse(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ! [X0] : function(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | relation_composition(X0,X1) != X0
      | relation_rng(X0) != relation_dom(X1)
      | identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ! [X0] : one_to_one(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f164,plain,
    identity_relation(sK11) != function_inverse(identity_relation(sK11)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f101]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation_rng(identity_relation(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( relation(function_inverse(X0))
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( function(function_inverse(X0))
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : function(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

tcf(c_101,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = X1 )
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ( relation_dom(X1) != relation_rng(X0) )
      | ( relation_composition(X0,X1) != X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f156]) ).

tcf(c_103,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : one_to_one(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) = relation_rng(X0) )
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f160]) ).

tcf(c_107,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) )
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163]) ).

tcf(c_109,negated_conjecture,
    function_inverse(identity_relation(sK11)) != identity_relation(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

tcf(c_112,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation_rng(identity_relation(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f166]) ).

tcf(c_692,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) )
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ( identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_693,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_composition(identity_relation(X0),function_inverse(identity_relation(X0))) = identity_relation(relation_dom(identity_relation(X0))) )
      | ~ relation(identity_relation(X0))
      | ~ function(identity_relation(X0)) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_692]) ).

tcf(c_695,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation_composition(identity_relation(X0),function_inverse(identity_relation(X0))) = identity_relation(relation_dom(identity_relation(X0))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_693,c_67,c_66,c_693]) ).

tcf(c_710,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( relation_dom(function_inverse(X1)) = relation_rng(X1) )
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ( identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_711,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(X0))) = relation_rng(identity_relation(X0)) )
      | ~ relation(identity_relation(X0))
      | ~ function(identity_relation(X0)) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_710]) ).

tcf(c_713,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(X0))) = relation_rng(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_711,c_67,c_66,c_711]) ).

tcf(c_1015,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation_dom(function_inverse(identity_relation(X0))) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_713,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_1091,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation_composition(identity_relation(X0),function_inverse(identity_relation(X0))) = identity_relation(X0),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_695,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_1153,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = identity_relation(sK11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1154,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = function_inverse(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1155,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_1153,c_1154]) ).

tcf(c_1783,plain,
    function(iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1153,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_1784,plain,
    relation(iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1153,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_1828,plain,
    relation_rng(iPr_def_10) = sK11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1153,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_1947,plain,
    ( relation(iPr_def_11)
    | ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1154,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_1948,plain,
    relation(iPr_def_11),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1947,c_1784,c_1783]) ).

tcf(c_1955,plain,
    ( function(iPr_def_11)
    | ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1154,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_1956,plain,
    function(iPr_def_11),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1955,c_1784,c_1783]) ).

tcf(c_1957,plain,
    relation_dom(function_inverse(iPr_def_10)) = sK11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1153,c_1015]) ).

tcf(c_1961,plain,
    relation_dom(iPr_def_11) = sK11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1957,c_1154]) ).

tcf(c_2117,plain,
    relation_composition(iPr_def_10,function_inverse(iPr_def_10)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1153,c_1091]) ).

tcf(c_2120,plain,
    relation_composition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2117,c_1154]) ).

tcf(c_2534,plain,
    ( ( identity_relation(relation_dom(iPr_def_11)) = iPr_def_11 )
    | ~ relation(iPr_def_11)
    | ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ function(iPr_def_11)
    | ~ function(iPr_def_10)
    | ( relation_dom(iPr_def_11) != relation_rng(iPr_def_10) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2120,c_101]) ).

tcf(c_2536,plain,
    ( ( identity_relation(relation_dom(iPr_def_11)) = iPr_def_11 )
    | ~ relation(iPr_def_11)
    | ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ function(iPr_def_11)
    | ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_2534,c_1828,c_1961]) ).

tcf(c_2537,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_11 )
    | ~ relation(iPr_def_11)
    | ~ relation(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ function(iPr_def_11)
    | ~ function(iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2536,c_1153,c_1961]) ).

tcf(c_2538,plain,
    iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_11,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2537,c_1948,c_1784,c_1956,c_1783]) ).

tcf(c_2575,plain,
    iPr_def_10 != iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1155,c_2538]) ).

tcf(c_2576,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_2575]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU034+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:37:48 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 3.66/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.66/1.17  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.66/1.17  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 4  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Proving...
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % 
% 3.66/1.17  % clauses                               67
% 3.66/1.17  % conjectures                           1
% 3.66/1.17  % EPR                                   25
% 3.66/1.17  % Horn                                  65
% 3.66/1.17  % unary                                 36
% 3.66/1.17  % binary                                16
% 3.66/1.17  % lits                                  119
% 3.66/1.17  % lits eq                               22
% 3.66/1.17  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.66/1.17  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.66/1.17  % fd_cond                               1
% 3.66/1.17  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 3.66/1.17  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ 
% 3.66/1.17  % Current options:
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ 
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % 
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % ------ Proving...
% 3.66/1.17  % 
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.66/1.17  
% 3.66/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------