↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEU037+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:40:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 15.20s 9.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 15.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  112 (  51   ~;  44   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   3 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : 'set$uintersection2'(X0,X1) = 'set$uintersection2'(X1,X0) ).

fof(dt_k7_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1)) ) ).

fof(fc4_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( function('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1))
        & relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1)) ) ) ).

fof(t68_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( function(X2)
            & relation(X2) )
         => ( X1 = 'relation$udom$urestriction'(X2,X0)
          <=> ( ! [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,'relation$udom'(X1))
                 => apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
              & 'relation$udom'(X1) = 'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(X2),X0) ) ) ) ) ).

fof(t71_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( in(X1,'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(X2),X0))
       => apply('relation$udom$urestriction'(X2,X0),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ) ) ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( function(X2)
          & relation(X2) )
       => ( in(X1,'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(X2),X0))
         => apply('relation$udom$urestriction'(X2,X0),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[t71_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c6,plain,
    'set$uintersection2'(X0,X1) = 'set$uintersection2'(X1,X0),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c7,plain,
    ( relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1))
    | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[dt_k7_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c18,plain,
    ( function('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1))
    | ~ function(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[fc4_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c53,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | X0 != 'relation$udom$urestriction'(X1,X2)
    | 'relation$udom'(X0) = 'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(X1),X2) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[t68_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c54,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X2)
    | apply(X1,X0) = apply(X2,X0)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | X1 != 'relation$udom$urestriction'(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X0,'relation$udom'(X1)) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[t68_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c60,plain,
    relation(sK61),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c61,plain,
    function(sK61),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c62,plain,
    in(sK60,'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(sK61),sK59)),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c63,plain,
    apply('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59),sK60) != apply(sK61,sK60),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1))
    | ~ function(X0)
    | ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1))
    | ~ in(X2,'relation$udom'('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1)))
    | apply('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1),X2) = apply(X0,X2) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c54]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1))
    | ~ function(X0)
    | ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1))
    | 'relation$udom'('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1)) = 'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(X0),X1) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c53]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1))
    | ~ function(X0)
    | 'relation$udom'('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1)) = 'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(X0),X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d1,c7]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ function(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ function(X0)
    | 'relation$udom'('relation$udom$urestriction'(X0,X1)) = 'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(X0),X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d2,c18]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    ( ~ function(sK61)
    | 'relation$udom'('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,X0)) = 'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(sK61),X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,c60]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    'relation$udom'('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,X0)) = 'set$uintersection2'('relation$udom'(sK61),X0),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c61,d4]) ).

cnf(d6,plain,
    'relation$udom'('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,X0)) = 'set$uintersection2'(X0,'relation$udom'(sK61)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[d5,c6]) ).

cnf(d7,plain,
    in(sK60,'set$uintersection2'(sK59,'relation$udom'(sK61))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c62,c6]) ).

cnf(d8,plain,
    in(sK60,'relation$udom'('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[d7,d6]) ).

cnf(d9,plain,
    ( ~ relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59))
    | ~ relation(sK61)
    | ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59))
    | ~ function(sK61)
    | apply('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59),sK60) = apply(sK61,sK60) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d8,d0]) ).

cnf(d10,plain,
    ( ~ relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59))
    | ~ function(sK61)
    | ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59))
    | apply('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59),sK60) = apply(sK61,sK60) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c60,d9]) ).

cnf(d11,plain,
    ( ~ relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59))
    | ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59))
    | apply('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59),sK60) = apply(sK61,sK60) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c61,d10]) ).

cnf(d12,plain,
    ( ~ relation('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59))
    | ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c63,d11]) ).

cnf(d13,plain,
    ( ~ relation(sK61)
    | ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d12,c7]) ).

cnf(d14,plain,
    ~ function('relation$udom$urestriction'(sK61,sK59)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c60,d13]) ).

cnf(d15,plain,
    ( ~ relation(sK61)
    | ~ function(sK61) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d14,c18]) ).

cnf(d16,plain,
    ~ function(sK61),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c60,d15]) ).

cnf(d17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c61,d16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SEU037+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/5.43  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.17/5.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/5.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/5.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/5.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/5.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/5.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/5.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:32:01 UTC 2026
% 0.17/5.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/5.43  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 15.20/9.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 15.20/9.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------