↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU039+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.82s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   86 (  26 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  407 (  92 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  473 ( 187   ~; 185   |;  78   &)
%                                         (  11 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  169 (   0 sgn 148   !;  21   ?;  23   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ( in(X3,X1)
            & in(X3,X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ! [X1] :
          ( X1 = relation_rng(X0)
        <=> ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X1)
            <=> ? [X3] :
                  ( X2 = apply(X0,X3)
                  & in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k7_relat_1) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc4_funct_1) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( function(X2)
            & relation(X2) )
         => ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
          <=> ( ! [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                 => apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
              & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t68_funct_1) ).

fof(f41,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( in(X1,X0)
       => apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_funct_1) ).

fof(f42,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( ( in(X1,X0)
          & in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) )
       => in(apply(X2,X1),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t73_funct_1) ).

fof(f43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( function(X2)
          & relation(X2) )
       => ( ( in(X1,X0)
            & in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) )
         => in(apply(X2,X1),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f42]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( X1 = relation_rng(X0)
        <=> ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X1)
            <=> ? [X3] :
                  ( X2 = apply(X0,X3)
                  & in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( X1 = relation_rng(X0)
        <=> ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X1)
            <=> ? [X3] :
                  ( X2 = apply(X0,X3)
                  & in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
        & relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
          <=> ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  | apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
              & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)
          <=> ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  | apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
              & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X1,X0)
      | apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X1,X0)
      | apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( function(X2)
      & relation(X2)
      & in(X1,X0)
      & in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
      & ~ in(apply(X2,X1),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( function(X2)
      & relation(X2)
      & in(X1,X0)
      & in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
      & ~ in(apply(X2,X1),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0)
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
        | X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0)
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
        | X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ( ~ in(X4,X2)
              | ( in(X4,X1)
                & in(X4,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X4,X1)
              | ~ in(X4,X0)
              | in(X4,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
        | X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ( ~ in(X4,X2)
              | ( in(X4,X1)
                & in(X4,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X4,X1)
              | ~ in(X4,X0)
              | in(X4,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X2)
            | ( in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X1)
              & in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X0) ) )
          & ( ~ in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X2)
            | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X1)
            | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X0) ) )
        | X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X3,sK0(X0,X1,X2))],[f90]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ( relation_rng(X0) != X1
            | ! [X2] :
                ( ( ~ in(X2,X1)
                  | ? [X3] :
                      ( X2 = apply(X0,X3)
                      & in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
                & ( ! [X3] :
                      ( apply(X0,X3) != X2
                      | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
                  | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
          & ( ? [X2] :
                ( ( in(X2,X1)
                  | ? [X3] :
                      ( X2 = apply(X0,X3)
                      & in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
                & ( ~ in(X2,X1)
                  | ! [X3] :
                      ( apply(X0,X3) != X2
                      | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) )
            | X1 = relation_rng(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ( relation_rng(X0) != X1
            | ! [X5] :
                ( ( ~ in(X5,X1)
                  | ? [X7] :
                      ( apply(X0,X7) = X5
                      & in(X7,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
                & ( ! [X6] :
                      ( apply(X0,X6) != X5
                      | ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X0)) )
                  | in(X5,X1) ) ) )
          & ( ? [X2] :
                ( ( in(X2,X1)
                  | ? [X4] :
                      ( apply(X0,X4) = X2
                      & in(X4,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
                & ( ~ in(X2,X1)
                  | ! [X3] :
                      ( apply(X0,X3) != X2
                      | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) )
            | X1 = relation_rng(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ( relation_rng(X0) != X1
            | ! [X5] :
                ( ( ~ in(X5,X1)
                  | ( apply(X0,sK3(X0,X5)) = X5
                    & in(sK3(X0,X5),relation_dom(X0)) ) )
                & ( ! [X6] :
                      ( apply(X0,X6) != X5
                      | ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X0)) )
                  | in(X5,X1) ) ) )
          & ( ( ( in(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
                | ( sK1(X0,X1) = apply(X0,sK2(X0,X1))
                  & in(sK2(X0,X1),relation_dom(X0)) ) )
              & ( ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
                | ! [X3] :
                    ( apply(X0,X3) != sK1(X0,X1)
                    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) )
            | X1 = relation_rng(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X2,sK1(X0,X1)),skolemize(X4,sK2(X0,X1)),skolemize(X7,sK3(X0,X5))],[f93]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
              | ( ! [X3] :
                    ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                    | apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
                & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
            & ( ? [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  & apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
              | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
              | X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f80]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
              | ( ! [X3] :
                    ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                    | apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
                & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
            & ( ? [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  & apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
              | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
              | X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
              | ( ! [X4] :
                    ( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
                    | apply(X1,X4) = apply(X2,X4) )
                & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
            & ( ? [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
                  & apply(X1,X3) != apply(X2,X3) )
              | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
              | X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ function(X2)
          | ~ relation(X2)
          | ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
              | ( ! [X4] :
                    ( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
                    | apply(X1,X4) = apply(X2,X4) )
                & relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ) )
            & ( ( in(sK15(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
                & apply(X1,sK15(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,sK15(X1,X2)) )
              | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0)
              | X1 = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK15]),skolemize(X3,sK15(X1,X2))],[f108]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ( function(sK18)
    & relation(sK18)
    & in(sK17,sK16)
    & in(sK17,relation_dom(sK18))
    & ~ in(apply(sK18,sK17),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(sK18,sK16))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK16,sK17,sK18]),skolemize(X0,sK16),skolemize(X1,sK17),skolemize(X2,sK18)],[f85]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
      | ~ in(X4,X1)
      | ~ in(X4,X0)
      | in(X4,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X6,X5] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | relation_rng(X0) != X1
      | apply(X0,X6) != X5
      | ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X0))
      | in(X5,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != X1
      | relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X1,X0)
      | apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    function(sK18),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    relation(sK18),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f184,plain,
    in(sK17,sK16),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    in(sK17,relation_dom(sK18)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ~ in(apply(sK18,sK17),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(sK18,sK16))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f189,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ in(X4,X1)
      | ~ in(X4,X0)
      | in(X4,set_intersection2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f119]) ).

fof(f192,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X6] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | relation_rng(X0) != X1
      | ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X0))
      | in(apply(X0,X6),X1) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f125]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ! [X0,X6] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X0))
      | in(apply(X0,X6),relation_rng(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f192]) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    ! [X2,X0] :
      ( ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))
      | ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0))
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X0) = relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f177]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,set_intersection2(X2,X1))
      | ~ in(X0,X2)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f189]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(apply(X1,X0),relation_rng(X1))
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f193]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f129]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).

tcf(c_114,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(relation_dom(X0),X1) = relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) )
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1))
      | ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f196]) ).

tcf(c_117,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X2,X0) )
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f181]) ).

tcf(c_118,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(apply(sK18,sK17),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(sK18,sK16))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f186]) ).

tcf(c_119,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK17,relation_dom(sK18)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f185]) ).

tcf(c_120,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK17,sK16),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f184]) ).

tcf(c_121,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK18),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f183]) ).

tcf(c_122,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK18),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f182]) ).

tcf(c_163,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(relation_dom(X0),X1) = relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X0,X1)) )
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_65,c_76,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_1300,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = relation_dom(sK18),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1301,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = apply(sK18,sK17),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1302,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = relation_dom_restriction(sK18,sK16),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1303,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = relation_rng(iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1304,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK18),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_122]) ).

tcf(c_1305,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK18),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_121]) ).

tcf(c_1306,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK17,sK16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_120]) ).

tcf(c_1307,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK17,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_1300]) ).

tcf(c_1308,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_1302,c_1303,c_1301]) ).

tcf(c_2180,plain,
    ( relation(iPr_def_12)
    | ~ relation(sK18) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1302,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_2181,plain,
    relation(iPr_def_12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2180,c_1305]) ).

tcf(c_2469,plain,
    ( function(iPr_def_12)
    | ~ relation(sK18)
    | ~ function(sK18) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1302,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_2470,plain,
    function(iPr_def_12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2469,c_1305,c_1304]) ).

tcf(c_2927,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(relation_dom(sK18),X0) = relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK18,X0)) )
      | ~ relation(sK18) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1304,c_163]) ).

tcf(c_2935,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK18,X0)) = set_intersection2(iPr_def_10,X0) )
      | ~ relation(sK18) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2927,c_1300]) ).

tcf(c_2936,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(sK18,X0)) = set_intersection2(iPr_def_10,X0),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2935,c_1305]) ).

tcf(c_2980,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(apply(iPr_def_12,X0),iPr_def_13)
      | ~ relation(iPr_def_12)
      | ~ function(iPr_def_12)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_12)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1303,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_2990,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(apply(iPr_def_12,X0),iPr_def_13)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_12)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2980,c_2181,c_2470]) ).

tcf(c_3023,plain,
    set_intersection2(iPr_def_10,sK16) = relation_dom(iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1302,c_2936]) ).

tcf(c_3055,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_12))
      | ~ in(X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ in(X0,sK16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3023,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_3401,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X0,sK16),sK17) = apply(X0,sK17) )
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1306,c_117]) ).

tcf(c_3772,plain,
    ( ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(sK18,sK16),sK17) = apply(sK18,sK17) )
    | ~ relation(sK18) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1304,c_3401]) ).

tcf(c_3779,plain,
    ( ( apply(iPr_def_12,sK17) = iPr_def_11 )
    | ~ relation(sK18) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3772,c_1301,c_1302]) ).

tcf(c_3780,plain,
    apply(iPr_def_12,sK17) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3779,c_1305]) ).

tcf(c_3814,plain,
    ( in(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ in(sK17,relation_dom(iPr_def_12)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3780,c_2990]) ).

tcf(c_3815,plain,
    ~ in(sK17,relation_dom(iPr_def_12)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3814,c_1308]) ).

tcf(c_5559,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK17,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ in(sK17,sK16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3055,c_3815]) ).

tcf(c_5560,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5559,c_1307,c_1306]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU039+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:35:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42  % Proving...
% 2.82/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.82/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.82/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.82/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % 
% 2.82/1.28  % clauses                               71
% 2.82/1.28  % conjectures                           5
% 2.82/1.28  % EPR                                   29
% 2.82/1.28  % Horn                                  64
% 2.82/1.28  % unary                                 33
% 2.82/1.28  % binary                                15
% 2.82/1.28  % lits                                  153
% 2.82/1.28  % lits eq                               26
% 2.82/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.82/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.82/1.28  % fd_cond                               1
% 2.82/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        9
% 2.82/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.82/1.28  % Current options:
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % 
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.82/1.28  % 
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.82/1.28  
% 2.82/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------