↑ Up

SuperZenon---0.0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SEU040+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:48:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.65s 2.86s
% Output   : Proof 2.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU040+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 22:02:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.65/2.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.65/2.86  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.65/2.86  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.65/2.86  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.65/2.86  1. (relation T_0) (-. (relation T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.65/2.86  2. (-. (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_dom T_0))) (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_dom T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.65/2.86  3. ((relation T_0) => (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_dom T_0))) (-. (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_dom T_0))) (relation T_0)   ### Imply 1 2
% 2.65/2.86  4. (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction B T_1)) (relation_dom B)))) (relation T_0) (-. (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_dom T_0)))   ### All 3
% 2.65/2.86  5. (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_dom B))))) (-. (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_dom T_0))) (relation T_0)   ### All 4
% 2.65/2.86  6. (relation T_0) (-. (relation T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.65/2.86  7. (-. (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_rng T_0))) (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_rng T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.65/2.86  8. ((relation T_0) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_rng T_0))) (-. (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_rng T_0))) (relation T_0)   ### Imply 6 7
% 2.65/2.86  9. (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction B T_1)) (relation_rng B)))) (relation T_0) (-. (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_rng T_0)))   ### All 8
% 2.65/2.86  10. (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_rng B))))) (-. (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_rng T_0))) (relation T_0)   ### All 9
% 2.65/2.86  11. (-. ((subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_dom T_0)) /\ (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_rng T_0)))) (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_rng B))))) (relation T_0) (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_dom B)))))   ### NotAnd 5 10
% 2.65/2.86  12. (-. (((relation T_0) /\ (function T_0)) => ((subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_dom T_0)) /\ (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction T_0 T_1)) (relation_rng T_0))))) (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_dom B))))) (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_rng B)))))   ### ConjTree 11
% 2.65/2.86  13. (-. (All B, (((relation B) /\ (function B)) => ((subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction B T_1)) (relation_dom B)) /\ (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction B T_1)) (relation_rng B)))))) (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_rng B))))) (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_dom B)))))   ### NotAllEx 12
% 2.65/2.86  14. (-. (All A, (All B, (((relation B) /\ (function B)) => ((subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_dom B)) /\ (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_rng B))))))) (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_dom (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_dom B))))) (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_dom_restriction B A)) (relation_rng B)))))   ### NotAllEx 13
% 2.65/2.86  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.65/2.86  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------