↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU041+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:44:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  18   ~;  11   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  12   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t102_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( relation(C)
     => ( subset(A,B)
       => relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) = relation_dom_restriction(C,A) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t102_relat_1) ).

fof(t103_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( relation(C)
     => ( subset(A,B)
       => relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(C,B),A) = relation_dom_restriction(C,A) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t103_relat_1) ).

fof(t82_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( function(C)
        & relation(C) )
     => ( subset(A,B)
       => ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(C,B),A) = relation_dom_restriction(C,A)
          & relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) = relation_dom_restriction(C,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t82_funct_1) ).

fof(t82_funct_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( function(C)
          & relation(C) )
       => ( subset(A,B)
         => ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(C,B),A) = relation_dom_restriction(C,A)
            & relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) = relation_dom_restriction(C,A) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t82_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(A,C),B) = relation_dom_restriction(A,B)
    | ~ subset(B,C)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t103_relat_1]) ).

fof(nnf_33,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(C,B),A) != relation_dom_restriction(C,A)
        | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(C,A),B) != relation_dom_restriction(C,A) )
      & subset(A,B)
      & function(C)
      & relation(C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t82_funct_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t82_funct_1_neg,plain,
    ( ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK1),sK0) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0)
      | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0),sK1) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0) )
    & subset(sK0,sK1)
    & function(sK2)
    & relation(sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK2)],[nnf_33]) ).

cnf(c_35,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t82_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(A,B),C) = relation_dom_restriction(A,B)
    | ~ subset(B,C)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t102_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(A,sK0),sK1) = relation_dom_restriction(A,sK0)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(A,sK1),sK0) = relation_dom_restriction(A,sK0)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t82_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK1),sK0) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0)
    | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0),sK1) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t82_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_182,plain,
    relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK1),sK0) = relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_183,plain,
    relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0),sK1) = relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_188,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK1),sK0) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0)
    | relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_183,c_87]) ).

cnf(c_189,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0)
    | relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_182,c_188]) ).

cnf(c_190,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0) != relation_dom_restriction(sK2,sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_189]) ).

cnf(c_187,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_190]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SEU041+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.44  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:34:37 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.45  % Process 1266117 was started by sandbox2 on n002,
% 0.17/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 08:34:37 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.17/0.48  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.17/0.48  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.17/0.48  % Maximum clause weight is 43.000.
% 0.17/0.48  % Given clauses 43.
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------