↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SEU045+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.U841SCibkH true

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:53:21 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.63s 1.02s
% Output   : Refutation 0.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU045+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.U841SCibkH true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 16:10:38 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.62/0.69  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.62/0.69  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.62/0.69  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.62/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.62/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.62/0.82  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.62/0.82  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.63/1.02  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.63/1.02  % BCE start: 65
% 0.63/1.02  % BCE eliminated: 4
% 0.63/1.02  % PE start: 61
% 0.63/1.02  logic: eq
% 0.63/1.02  % PE eliminated: 3
% 0.63/1.02  % done 203 iterations in 0.202s
% 0.63/1.02  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.63/1.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.63/1.02  thf(sk__12_type, type, sk__12: $i).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(in_type, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(relation_type, type, relation: $i > $o).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(relation_dom_type, type, relation_dom: $i > $i).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(sk__11_type, type, sk__11: $i).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(sk__13_type, type, sk__13: $i).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_tseitin_1_type, type, zip_tseitin_1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_tseitin_0_type, type, zip_tseitin_0: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(relation_rng_restriction_type, type, relation_rng_restriction: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(function_type, type, function: $i > $o).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(t85_funct_1, axiom,
% 0.63/1.02    (![A:$i,B:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02     ( ( ( function @ B ) & ( relation @ B ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02       ( ![C:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02         ( ( ( function @ C ) & ( relation @ C ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02           ( ( ( B ) = ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ C ) ) <=>
% 0.63/1.02             ( ( ![D:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02                 ( ( in @ D @ ( relation_dom @ B ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02                   ( ( apply @ B @ D ) = ( apply @ C @ D ) ) ) ) & 
% 0.63/1.02               ( ![D:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02                 ( ( in @ D @ ( relation_dom @ B ) ) <=>
% 0.63/1.02                   ( ( in @ ( apply @ C @ D ) @ A ) & 
% 0.63/1.02                     ( in @ D @ ( relation_dom @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zf_stmt_0, type, zip_tseitin_1 : $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zf_stmt_1, axiom,
% 0.63/1.02    (![D:$i,C:$i,A:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02     ( ( zip_tseitin_1 @ D @ C @ A ) <=>
% 0.63/1.02       ( ( in @ D @ ( relation_dom @ C ) ) & ( in @ ( apply @ C @ D ) @ A ) ) ))).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zf_stmt_2, type, zip_tseitin_0 : $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zf_stmt_3, axiom,
% 0.63/1.02    (![D:$i,C:$i,B:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02     ( ( zip_tseitin_0 @ D @ C @ B ) <=>
% 0.63/1.02       ( ( in @ D @ ( relation_dom @ B ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02         ( ( apply @ B @ D ) = ( apply @ C @ D ) ) ) ))).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zf_stmt_4, axiom,
% 0.63/1.02    (![A:$i,B:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02     ( ( ( relation @ B ) & ( function @ B ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02       ( ![C:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02         ( ( ( relation @ C ) & ( function @ C ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02           ( ( ( B ) = ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ C ) ) <=>
% 0.63/1.02             ( ( ![D:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02                 ( ( in @ D @ ( relation_dom @ B ) ) <=>
% 0.63/1.02                   ( zip_tseitin_1 @ D @ C @ A ) ) ) & 
% 0.63/1.02               ( ![D:$i]: ( zip_tseitin_0 @ D @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ))).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl62, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.63/1.02         (~ (relation @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ((X2) != (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0))
% 0.63/1.02          |  (zip_tseitin_0 @ X3 @ X0 @ X2)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ X2)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (relation @ X2))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_4])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl54, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.63/1.02         (~ (in @ X0 @ (relation_dom @ X1))
% 0.63/1.02          | ((apply @ X1 @ X0) = (apply @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (zip_tseitin_0 @ X0 @ X2 @ X1))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl328, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.63/1.02         (~ (relation @ X1)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ X1)
% 0.63/1.02          | ((X1) != (relation_rng_restriction @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (relation @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ((apply @ X1 @ X3) = (apply @ X0 @ X3))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (in @ X3 @ (relation_dom @ X1)))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.63/1.02                [zip_derived_cl62, zip_derived_cl54])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl429, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.63/1.02         (~ (in @ X2 @ (relation_dom @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0)))
% 0.63/1.02          | ((apply @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)
% 0.63/1.02              = (apply @ X0 @ X2))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (relation @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (relation @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl328])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(fc5_funct_1, axiom,
% 0.63/1.02    (![A:$i,B:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02     ( ( ( relation @ B ) & ( function @ B ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02       ( ( relation @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ B ) ) & 
% 0.63/1.02         ( function @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ B ) ) ) ))).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.63/1.02         ( (function @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ X1)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (relation @ X1))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fc5_funct_1])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl781, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.63/1.02         (~ (relation @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (relation @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ((apply @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)
% 0.63/1.02              = (apply @ X0 @ X2))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (in @ X2 @ (relation_dom @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl429, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(dt_k8_relat_1, axiom,
% 0.63/1.02    (![A:$i,B:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02     ( ( relation @ B ) => ( relation @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ B ) ) ))).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.63/1.02         ( (relation @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (relation @ X1))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [dt_k8_relat_1])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl782, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.63/1.02         (~ (in @ X2 @ (relation_dom @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0)))
% 0.63/1.02          | ((apply @ (relation_rng_restriction @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)
% 0.63/1.02              = (apply @ X0 @ X2))
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (relation @ X0)
% 0.63/1.02          | ~ (function @ X0))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl781, zip_derived_cl25])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(t87_funct_1, conjecture,
% 0.63/1.02    (![A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02     ( ( ( relation @ C ) & ( function @ C ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02       ( ( in @ B @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ C ) ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02         ( ( apply @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ C ) @ B ) =
% 0.63/1.02           ( apply @ C @ B ) ) ) ))).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zf_stmt_5, negated_conjecture,
% 0.63/1.02    (~( ![A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]:
% 0.63/1.02        ( ( ( relation @ C ) & ( function @ C ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02          ( ( in @ B @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ C ) ) ) =>
% 0.63/1.02            ( ( apply @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ C ) @ B ) =
% 0.63/1.02              ( apply @ C @ B ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.63/1.02    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [t87_funct_1])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl52, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (((apply @ (relation_rng_restriction @ sk__11 @ sk__13) @ sk__12)
% 0.63/1.02         != (apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_5])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl788, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      ((((apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12) != (apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12))
% 0.63/1.02        | ~ (function @ sk__13)
% 0.63/1.02        | ~ (relation @ sk__13)
% 0.63/1.02        | ~ (in @ sk__12 @ 
% 0.63/1.02             (relation_dom @ (relation_rng_restriction @ sk__11 @ sk__13))))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl782, zip_derived_cl52])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl51, plain, ( (function @ sk__13)),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_5])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain, ( (relation @ sk__13)),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_5])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl53, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      ( (in @ sk__12 @ 
% 0.63/1.02         (relation_dom @ (relation_rng_restriction @ sk__11 @ sk__13)))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_5])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl792, plain,
% 0.63/1.02      (((apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12) != (apply @ sk__13 @ sk__12))),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.63/1.02                [zip_derived_cl788, zip_derived_cl51, zip_derived_cl50, 
% 0.63/1.02                 zip_derived_cl53])).
% 0.63/1.02  thf(zip_derived_cl793, plain, ($false),
% 0.63/1.02      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl792])).
% 0.63/1.02  
% 0.63/1.02  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.63/1.02  
% 0.63/1.02  
% 0.63/1.02  % Terminating...
% 2.81/1.13  % Runner terminated.
% 2.81/1.15  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------