%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SEU045+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.00s 11.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 16
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 63 ( 20 unt; 6 def)
% Number of atoms : 274 ( 44 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 307 ( 114 ~; 111 |; 59 &)
% ( 11 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 5 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 131 ( 0 sgn 119 !; 12 ?; 28 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f19,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( function(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc5_funct_1) ).
fof(f33,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)))
=> apply(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t87_funct_1) ).
fof(f34,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)))
=> apply(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2),X1) = apply(X2,X1) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f33]) ).
fof(f35,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( X1 = relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)
<=> ( ! [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
=> apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t85_funct_1) ).
fof(f37,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( X1 = relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
=> apply(X2,X4) = apply(X1,X4) )
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f35]) ).
fof(f59,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f60,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ( function(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ( function(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f60]) ).
fof(f65,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& in(X1,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)))
& apply(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2),X1) != apply(X2,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( function(X2)
& relation(X2)
& in(X1,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)))
& apply(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2),X1) != apply(X2,X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f65]) ).
fof(f67,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( X1 = relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X2,X4) = apply(X1,X4) )
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( X1 = relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X2,X4) = apply(X1,X4) )
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f67]) ).
fof(f83,plain,
( function(sK15)
& relation(sK15)
& in(sK14,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(sK13,sK15)))
& apply(relation_rng_restriction(sK13,sK15),sK14) != apply(sK15,sK14) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13,sK14,sK15]),skolemize(X0,sK13),skolemize(X1,sK14),skolemize(X2,sK15)],[f66]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X1,X0,X2] :
( ~ sP1(X1,X0,X2)
| ( ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) != X1
| sP0(X2,X0,X1) )
& ( ~ sP0(X2,X0,X1)
| X1 = relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ sP1(X0,X1,X2)
| ( ( relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2) != X0
| sP0(X2,X1,X0) )
& ( ~ sP0(X2,X1,X0)
| relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2) = X0 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f84]) ).
fof(f112,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).
fof(f113,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| function(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f135,plain,
function(sK15),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f136,plain,
relation(sK15),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f137,plain,
in(sK14,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(sK13,sK15))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f138,plain,
apply(relation_rng_restriction(sK13,sK15),sK14) != apply(sK15,sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f139,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ sP1(X0,X1,X2)
| relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2) != X0
| sP0(X2,X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).
fof(f151,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| sP1(X1,X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).
fof(f152,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( ~ sP1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X1,X2)
| sP0(X2,X1,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f139]) ).
tcf(c_69,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0))
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
tcf(c_70,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).
tcf(c_71,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( function(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f113]) ).
tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
apply(relation_rng_restriction(sK13,sK15),sK14) != apply(sK15,sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138]) ).
tcf(c_93,negated_conjecture,
in(sK14,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(sK13,sK15))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).
tcf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK15),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).
tcf(c_95,negated_conjecture,
function(sK15),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).
tcf(c_97,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( sP0(X1,X0,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ sP1(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1),X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f152]) ).
tcf(c_108,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( sP1(X0,X2,X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f151]) ).
tcf(c_135,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0))
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_69]) ).
tcf(c_590,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( sP0(X1,X0,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ function(X4)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ( X1 != X4 )
| ( X0 != X3 )
| ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_108]) ).
tcf(c_591,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( sP0(X1,X0,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_590]) ).
tcf(c_603,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( sP0(X0,X1,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_591,c_71,c_135]) ).
tcf(c_2799,definition,
iPr_def_10 = relation_rng_restriction(sK13,sK15),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2800,definition,
iPr_def_11 = relation_dom(iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2801,definition,
iPr_def_12 = apply(iPr_def_10,sK14),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2802,definition,
iPr_def_13 = apply(sK15,sK14),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2803,negated_conjecture,
function(sK15),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_95]) ).
tcf(c_2804,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK15),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_94]) ).
tcf(c_2805,negated_conjecture,
in(sK14,iPr_def_11),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_2799,c_2800]) ).
tcf(c_2806,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_13,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_2802,c_2801]) ).
tcf(c_4770,plain,
( sP0(sK15,sK13,iPr_def_10)
| ~ function(sK15)
| ~ relation(sK15) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2799,c_603]) ).
tcf(c_4775,plain,
sP0(sK15,sK13,iPr_def_10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4770,c_2803,c_2804]) ).
fof(f69,definition,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( sP0(X2,X0,X1)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X2,X4) = apply(X1,X4) )
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP0])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).
fof(f70,definition,
! [X1,X0,X2] :
( ~ sP1(X1,X0,X2)
| ( X1 = relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)
<=> sP0(X2,X0,X1) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).
fof(f71,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| sP1(X1,X0,X2) ) ),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f68,f70,f69]) ).
fof(f86,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ( ~ sP0(X2,X0,X1)
| ( ! [X4] :
( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X2,X4) = apply(X1,X4) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X3,relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ) )
& ( ? [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X2,X4) != apply(X1,X4) )
| ? [X3] :
( ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
| sP0(X2,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ( ~ sP0(X2,X0,X1)
| ( ! [X4] :
( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
| apply(X2,X4) = apply(X1,X4) )
& ! [X3] :
( ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X3,relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ) )
& ( ? [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X2,X4) != apply(X1,X4) )
| ? [X3] :
( ( in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ( in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
& ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(apply(X2,X3),X0)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
| sP0(X2,X0,X1) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f86]) ).
fof(f88,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2)
| ( ! [X6] :
( ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X2))
| apply(X0,X6) = apply(X2,X6) )
& ! [X5] :
( ( ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X2))
| ( in(apply(X0,X5),X1)
& in(X5,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ~ in(apply(X0,X5),X1)
| ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X0))
| in(X5,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) )
& ( ? [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
& apply(X2,X4) != apply(X0,X4) )
| ? [X3] :
( ( in(X3,relation_dom(X2))
| ( in(apply(X0,X3),X1)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ in(apply(X0,X3),X1)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
| sP0(X0,X1,X2) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2)
| ( ! [X6] :
( ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X2))
| apply(X0,X6) = apply(X2,X6) )
& ! [X5] :
( ( ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X2))
| ( in(apply(X0,X5),X1)
& in(X5,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ~ in(apply(X0,X5),X1)
| ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X0))
| in(X5,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) )
& ( ( in(sK17(X0,X2),relation_dom(X2))
& apply(X2,sK17(X0,X2)) != apply(X0,sK17(X0,X2)) )
| ( ( in(sK16(X0,X1,X2),relation_dom(X2))
| ( in(apply(X0,sK16(X0,X1,X2)),X1)
& in(sK16(X0,X1,X2),relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ~ in(sK16(X0,X1,X2),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ in(apply(X0,sK16(X0,X1,X2)),X1)
| ~ in(sK16(X0,X1,X2),relation_dom(X0)) ) )
| sP0(X0,X1,X2) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK16,sK17]),skolemize(X3,sK16(X0,X1,X2)),skolemize(X4,sK17(X0,X2))],[f88]) ).
fof(f141,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1,X6] :
( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X2))
| apply(X0,X6) = apply(X2,X6) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).
tcf(c_107,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( apply(X0,X3) = apply(X2,X3) )
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).
tcf(c_4802,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apply(sK15,X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0) )
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(iPr_def_10)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4775,c_107]) ).
tcf(c_4811,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apply(sK15,X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0) )
| ~ in(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_4802,c_2800]) ).
tcf(c_5365,plain,
apply(sK15,sK14) = apply(iPr_def_10,sK14),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2805,c_4811]) ).
tcf(c_5371,plain,
iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_13,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_5365,c_2801,c_2802]) ).
tcf(c_5372,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5371,c_2806]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU045+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/10.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/10.38 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:38:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/10.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/10.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/10.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.42
% 0.15/10.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/10.42
% 0.15/10.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/10.44 % Proving...
% 2.00/11.29 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.00/11.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.00/11.29 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.00/11.29 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Parsing...
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Proving...
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 %
% 2.00/11.29 % clauses 58
% 2.00/11.29 % conjectures 4
% 2.00/11.29 % EPR 28
% 2.00/11.29 % Horn 51
% 2.00/11.29 % unary 29
% 2.00/11.29 % binary 11
% 2.00/11.29 % lits 117
% 2.00/11.29 % lits eq 12
% 2.00/11.29 % fd_pure 0
% 2.00/11.29 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.00/11.29 % fd_cond 1
% 2.00/11.29 % fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 2.00/11.29 % AC symbols 0
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------
% 2.00/11.29 % Current options:
% 2.00/11.29 % ------
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 %
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % ------ Proving...
% 2.00/11.29 %
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.00/11.29
% 2.00/11.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------