↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEU046+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:40:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 61.99s 9.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 61.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU046+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:32:17 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 61.99/9.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 61.99/9.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 61.99/9.68  fof(d3_tarski, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((subset(X0,X1) <=> ! [X2] : ((in(X2,X0) => in(X2,X1)))))).
% 61.99/9.68  fof(dt_k8_relat_1, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((relation(X1) => relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1))))).
% 61.99/9.68  fof(fc5_funct_1, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : (((relation(X1) & function(X1)) => (relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)) & function('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)))))).
% 61.99/9.68  fof(t118_relat_1, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((relation(X1) => subset('relation$urng'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),'relation$urng'(X1))))).
% 61.99/9.68  fof(t85_funct_1, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : (((relation(X1) & function(X1)) => ! [X2] : (((relation(X2) & function(X2)) => (X1 = 'relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X2) <=> (! [X3] : ((in(X3,'relation$udom'(X1)) <=> (in(X3,'relation$udom'(X2)) & in(apply(X2,X3),X0)))) & ! [X3] : ((in(X3,'relation$udom'(X1)) => apply(X1,X3) = apply(X2,X3)))))))))).
% 61.99/9.68  fof(t89_funct_1, conjecture, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : (((relation(X1) & function(X1)) => (subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),'relation$udom'(X1)) & subset('relation$urng'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),'relation$urng'(X1)))))).
% 61.99/9.68  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ! [X1] : (((relation(X1) & function(X1)) => (subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),'relation$udom'(X1)) & subset('relation$urng'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),'relation$urng'(X1))))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [t89_funct_1])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c7, plain, subset(X0,X1) | in(sK8(X0,X1),X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d3_tarski])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c8, plain, subset(X0,X1) | ~in(sK8(X0,X1),X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d3_tarski])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c9, plain, ~relation(X0) | relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [dt_k8_relat_1])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c19, plain, ~relation(X0) | ~function(X0) | function('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [fc5_funct_1])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c47, plain, ~relation(X0) | subset('relation$urng'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)),'relation$urng'(X0)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [t118_relat_1])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c56, plain, X0(X1,X2,X3) | ~function(X3) | ~function(X2) | X2 != 'relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X3) | ~relation(X3) | ~relation(X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [t85_funct_1])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c60, plain, ~X0(X1,X2,X3) | ~in(X4,'relation$udom'(X2)) | in(X4,'relation$udom'(X3)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [t85_funct_1])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c70, plain, relation(sK62), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c71, plain, function(sK62), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(c72, plain, ~subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)),'relation$udom'(sK62)) | ~subset('relation$urng'('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)),'relation$urng'(sK62)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d0, plain, ~relation(sK62) | ~subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)),'relation$udom'(sK62)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c47,c72])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d1, plain, ~subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)),'relation$udom'(sK62)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c70,d0])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d2, plain, ~function(X0) | ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | ~relation(X0) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | 'Ts51'(X1,'relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0),X0), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c56])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d3, plain, ~function(X0) | ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | ~relation(X0) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | in(X2,'relation$udom'(X0)) | ~in(X2,'relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d2,c60])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d4, plain, in(sK8('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),X2),'relation$udom'(X1)) | ~function(X1) | ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)) | ~relation(X1) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)) | subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),X2), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d3,c7])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d5, plain, ~function(X0) | ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | ~relation(X0) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)) | subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)),'relation$udom'(X0)) | subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0)),'relation$udom'(X0)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,c8])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d6, plain, ~function(sK62) | ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)) | ~relation(sK62) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d5,d1])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d7, plain, ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)) | ~function(sK62) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c70,d6])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d8, plain, ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)) | ~relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c71,d7])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d9, plain, ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)) | ~relation(sK62), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d8,c9])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d10, plain, ~function('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK61,sK62)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c70,d9])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d11, plain, ~function(sK62) | ~relation(sK62), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d10,c19])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d12, plain, ~function(sK62), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c70,d11])).
% 61.99/9.68  cnf(d13, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c71,d12])).
% 61.99/9.68  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------