↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU047+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:33 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  14   ~;  10   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t97_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( relation(X3)
        & function(X3) )
     => ( subset(X1,X2)
       => ( relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)
          & relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t97_funct_1) ).

fof(t129_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( subset(X1,X2)
       => relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t129_relat_1) ).

fof(t130_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( subset(X1,X2)
       => relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t130_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( relation(X3)
          & function(X3) )
       => ( subset(X1,X2)
         => ( relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)
            & relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t97_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk14_0)
    & function(esk14_0)
    & subset(esk12_0,esk13_0)
    & ( relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)) != relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)
      | relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,esk14_0)) != relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X101,X102,X103] :
      ( ~ relation(X103)
      | ~ subset(X101,X102)
      | relation_rng_restriction(X102,relation_rng_restriction(X101,X103)) = relation_rng_restriction(X101,X103) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t129_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)) != relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)
    | relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,esk14_0)) != relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( relation_rng_restriction(X3,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1)) = relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk12_0,esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X104,X105,X106] :
      ( ~ relation(X106)
      | ~ subset(X104,X105)
      | relation_rng_restriction(X104,relation_rng_restriction(X105,X106)) = relation_rng_restriction(X104,X106) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t130_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,esk14_0)) != relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X3,X1)) = relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU047+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.17/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:42:02 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------