↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU048+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:23:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 9.10s 2.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  235 (  41 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   79 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  315 ( 124   ~; 149   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   24 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   9 sgn  29   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t99_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( one_to_one(X2)
       => one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t99_funct_1) ).

fof(t85_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( ( function(X3)
            & relation(X3) )
         => ( X2 = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)
          <=> ( ! [X4] :
                  ( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
                 => apply(X2,X4) = apply(X3,X4) )
              & ! [X4] :
                  ( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
                <=> ( in(apply(X3,X4),X1)
                    & in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t85_funct_1) ).

fof(fc5_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( function(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
        & relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc5_funct_1) ).

fof(dt_k8_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).

fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ( one_to_one(X1)
      <=> ! [X2,X3] :
            ( ( apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3)
              & in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
              & in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) )
           => X2 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( function(X2)
          & relation(X2) )
       => ( one_to_one(X2)
         => one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t99_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57] :
      ( ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 = relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53))
        | in(apply(X54,esk14_3(X52,X53,X54)),X52)
        | apply(X53,esk15_3(X52,X53,X54)) != apply(X54,esk15_3(X52,X53,X54)) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 = relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53))
        | in(apply(X54,esk14_3(X52,X53,X54)),X52)
        | in(esk15_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53)) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 = relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53))
        | in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X54))
        | apply(X53,esk15_3(X52,X53,X54)) != apply(X54,esk15_3(X52,X53,X54)) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 = relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53))
        | in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X54))
        | in(esk15_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53)) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 = relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | ~ in(apply(X54,esk14_3(X52,X53,X54)),X52)
        | ~ in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X54))
        | ~ in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53))
        | apply(X53,esk15_3(X52,X53,X54)) != apply(X54,esk15_3(X52,X53,X54)) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 = relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | ~ in(apply(X54,esk14_3(X52,X53,X54)),X52)
        | ~ in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X54))
        | ~ in(esk14_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53))
        | in(esk15_3(X52,X53,X54),relation_dom(X53)) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 != relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | apply(X53,X57) = apply(X54,X57)
        | ~ in(X57,relation_dom(X53)) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 != relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | in(X56,relation_dom(X53))
        | ~ in(apply(X54,X56),X52)
        | ~ in(X56,relation_dom(X54)) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 != relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | ~ in(X55,relation_dom(X53))
        | in(apply(X54,X55),X52) )
      & ( ~ function(X53)
        | ~ relation(X53)
        | ~ function(X54)
        | ~ relation(X54)
        | X53 != relation_rng_restriction(X52,X54)
        | ~ in(X55,relation_dom(X53))
        | in(X55,relation_dom(X54)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t85_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] :
      ( ( ~ function(X21)
        | ~ relation(X21)
        | function(relation_rng_restriction(X20,X21)) )
      & ( ~ function(X21)
        | ~ relation(X21)
        | relation(relation_rng_restriction(X20,X21)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc5_funct_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X15,X16))
      | ~ relation(X16) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k8_relat_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(esk16_0,esk17_0))
    & one_to_one(esk17_0)
    & function(esk17_0)
    & relation(esk17_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | X2 != relation_rng_restriction(X4,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | apply(X2,X1) = apply(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | function(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X1)
    | relation(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | one_to_one(X10)
        | esk1_1(X10) != esk2_1(X10) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | one_to_one(X10)
        | apply(X10,esk1_1(X10)) = apply(X10,esk2_1(X10)) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | one_to_one(X10)
        | in(esk2_1(X10),relation_dom(X10)) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | one_to_one(X10)
        | in(esk1_1(X10),relation_dom(X10)) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | X11 = X12
        | apply(X10,X11) != apply(X10,X12)
        | ~ in(X12,relation_dom(X10))
        | ~ in(X11,relation_dom(X10))
        | ~ one_to_one(X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk17_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk17_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | apply(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk2_1(X1),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    function(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk1_1(X1),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | apply(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk2_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)))
    | apply(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0),X2) = apply(esk17_0,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)),relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)))
    | one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | X3 != relation_rng_restriction(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
    | in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)),relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)))
    | one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))
    | apply(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0),esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) = apply(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0),esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))
    | apply(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0),esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) = apply(esk17_0,esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X2)))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | apply(X1,X2) != apply(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ one_to_one(X1)
    | X2 = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(esk17_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))
    | apply(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0),esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) = apply(esk17_0,esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))
    | apply(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0),esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) = apply(esk17_0,esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X2,esk17_0)))
    | in(X1,relation_dom(esk17_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk17_0))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(esk17_0))
    | apply(esk17_0,X1) != apply(esk17_0,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_15]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))
    | apply(esk17_0,esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) = apply(esk17_0,esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)),relation_dom(esk17_0))
    | one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk17_0))
    | apply(esk17_0,X1) != apply(esk17_0,esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X2,esk17_0)))
    | one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X2,esk17_0))
    | X1 = esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X2,esk17_0)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)),relation_dom(esk17_0))
    | one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1)
    | one_to_one(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0))
    | esk2_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)) = esk1_1(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(esk16_0,esk17_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk17_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_19]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU048+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:50:28 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.10/2.03  % Version: 3.5.1
% 9.10/2.03  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 9.10/2.03  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % new_bool_3 with pid 1105219 completed with status 9
% 9.10/2.03  % new_bool_1 with pid 1105220 completed with status 9
% 9.10/2.03  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1105218 completed with status 0
% 9.10/2.03  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.10/2.03  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 9.10/2.03  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.10/2.03  % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.10/2.03  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 9.10/2.03  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 136s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with pid 1105229 completed with status 0
% 9.10/2.03  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b
% 9.10/2.03  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 9.10/2.03  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.10/2.03  % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.10/2.03  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 9.10/2.03  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 136s (1) cores
% 9.10/2.03  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 9.10/2.03  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.10/2.03  
% 9.10/2.03  % Proof found!
% 9.10/2.03  % SZS status Theorem
% 9.10/2.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.10/2.03  % Parsed axioms                        : 35
% 9.10/2.03  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 9.10/2.03  % Initial clauses                      : 69
% 9.10/2.03  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 9.10/2.03  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 67
% 9.10/2.03  % Processed clauses                    : 4656
% 9.10/2.03  % ...of these trivial                  : 74
% 9.10/2.03  % ...subsumed                          : 2772
% 9.10/2.03  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1810
% 9.10/2.03  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 9.10/2.03  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 9.10/2.04  % Backward-rewritten                   : 640
% 9.10/2.04  % Generated clauses                    : 46301
% 9.10/2.04  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32348
% 9.10/2.04  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 60
% 9.10/2.04  % Paramodulations                      : 46285
% 9.10/2.04  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % NegExts                              : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % Equation resolutions                 : 16
% 9.10/2.04  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % Total rewrite steps                  : 104396
% 9.10/2.04  % ...of those cached                   : 103852
% 9.10/2.04  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 9.10/2.04  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 9.10/2.04  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.10/2.04  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 9.10/2.04  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.10/2.04  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 9.10/2.04  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 9.10/2.04  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 9.10/2.04  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 9.10/2.04  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 9.10/2.04  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 9.10/2.04  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 9.10/2.04  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1097
% 9.10/2.04  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 113
% 9.10/2.04  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.10/2.04  %    Negative unit clauses             : 12
% 9.10/2.04  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 972
% 9.10/2.04  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26853
% 9.10/2.04  % ...number of literals in the above   : 86002
% 9.10/2.04  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % Current number of archived clauses   : 709
% 9.10/2.04  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 340194
% 9.10/2.04  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 196056
% 9.10/2.04  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1506
% 9.10/2.04  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7190
% 9.10/2.04  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 792
% 9.10/2.04  % BW rewrite match successes           : 54
% 9.10/2.04  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 9.10/2.04  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1412202
% 9.10/2.04  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 788
% 9.10/2.04  
% 9.10/2.04  % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.10/2.04  % User time                : 1.536 s
% 9.10/2.04  % System time              : 0.052 s
% 9.10/2.04  % Total time               : 1.588 s
% 9.10/2.04  % Maximum resident set size: 3404 pages
% 9.10/2.04  
% 9.10/2.04  % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.10/2.04  % User time                : 7.801 s
% 9.10/2.04  % System time              : 0.291 s
% 9.10/2.04  % Total time               : 8.092 s
% 9.10/2.04  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 9.10/2.04  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------