↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU056+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:44:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  19   ~;  11   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  12   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d7_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( disjoint(A,B)
    <=> set_intersection2(A,B) = empty_set ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

fof(t121_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( function(C)
        & relation(C) )
     => ( one_to_one(C)
       => relation_image(C,set_intersection2(A,B)) = set_intersection2(relation_image(C,A),relation_image(C,B)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t121_funct_1) ).

fof(t149_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => relation_image(A,empty_set) = empty_set ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t149_relat_1) ).

fof(t125_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( function(C)
        & relation(C) )
     => ( ( one_to_one(C)
          & disjoint(A,B) )
       => disjoint(relation_image(C,A),relation_image(C,B)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t125_funct_1) ).

fof(t125_funct_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( function(C)
          & relation(C) )
       => ( ( one_to_one(C)
            & disjoint(A,B) )
         => disjoint(relation_image(C,A),relation_image(C,B)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t125_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    ( relation_image(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) = set_intersection2(relation_image(A,B),relation_image(A,C))
    | ~ one_to_one(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t121_funct_1]) ).

fof(nnf_36,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ~ disjoint(relation_image(C,A),relation_image(C,B))
      & one_to_one(C)
      & disjoint(A,B)
      & function(C)
      & relation(C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t125_funct_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t125_funct_1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(relation_image(sK0,sK1),relation_image(sK0,sK2))
    & one_to_one(sK0)
    & disjoint(sK1,sK2)
    & function(sK0)
    & relation(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK2),skolemize(C,sK0)],[nnf_36]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t125_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_image(sK0,set_intersection2(A,B)) = set_intersection2(relation_image(sK0,A),relation_image(sK0,B))
    | ~ one_to_one(sK0)
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(relation_image(sK0,A),relation_image(sK0,B)) = relation_image(sK0,set_intersection2(A,B))
    | ~ one_to_one(sK0)
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_48]) ).

cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(relation_image(sK0,sK1),relation_image(sK0,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t125_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t125_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t125_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t125_funct_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( relation_image(A,empty_set) = empty_set
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t149_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(A,B) != empty_set
    | disjoint(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d7_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_97,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(A,B) = empty_set
    | ~ disjoint(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d7_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_162,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(relation_image(sK0,A),relation_image(sK0,B)) = relation_image(sK0,set_intersection2(A,B))
    | ~ one_to_one(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(relation_image(sK0,A),relation_image(sK0,B)) = relation_image(sK0,set_intersection2(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_162]) ).

cnf(c_107,plain,
    relation_image(sK0,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_163,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(relation_image(sK0,sK1),relation_image(sK0,sK2)) != empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_158,negated_conjecture,
    relation_image(sK0,set_intersection2(sK1,sK2)) != empty_set,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_163]) ).

cnf(c_160,plain,
    set_intersection2(sK1,sK2) = empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_164,negated_conjecture,
    relation_image(sK0,empty_set) != empty_set,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_158]) ).

cnf(c_165,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != empty_set,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_164]) ).

cnf(c_161,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_165]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SEU056+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:35:35 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.43  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.15/0.43  % Process 1267297 was started by sandbox2 on n002,
% 0.15/0.43  % Sat Sep 26 08:35:35 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.15/0.47  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.15/0.47  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.15/0.47  % Maximum clause weight is 32.000.
% 0.15/0.47  % Given clauses 39.
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------