%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU072+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:23:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 5.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 183 ( 51 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 235 ( 92 ~; 102 |; 23 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 0 sgn 39 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t153_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( ! [X2] : subset(relation_inverse_image(X1,relation_image(X1,X2)),X2)
=> one_to_one(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t153_funct_1) ).
fof(t117_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
=> relation_image(X2,singleton(X1)) = singleton(apply(X2,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t117_funct_1) ).
fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
<=> ! [X2,X3] :
( ( apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3)
& in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
& in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) )
=> X2 = X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).
fof(t39_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
<=> ( X1 = singleton(X2)
| X1 = empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t39_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(t142_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
<=> relation_inverse_image(X2,singleton(X1)) != empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t142_funct_1) ).
fof(t6_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(singleton(X1),singleton(X2))
=> X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(d5_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] :
( X3 = apply(X1,X4)
& in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( ! [X2] : subset(relation_inverse_image(X1,relation_image(X1,X2)),X2)
=> one_to_one(X1) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t153_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X51] :
( ~ one_to_one(esk17_0)
& subset(relation_inverse_image(esk17_0,relation_image(esk17_0,X51)),X51)
& function(esk17_0)
& relation(esk17_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X46,X47] :
( relation_image(X47,singleton(X46)) = singleton(apply(X47,X46))
| ~ in(X46,relation_dom(X47))
| ~ function(X47)
| ~ relation(X47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t117_funct_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
subset(relation_inverse_image(esk17_0,relation_image(esk17_0,X1)),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_image(X1,singleton(X2)) = singleton(apply(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk17_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
function(esk17_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X20,X21,X22] :
( ( ~ function(X20)
| ~ relation(X20)
| one_to_one(X20)
| esk4_1(X20) != esk5_1(X20) )
& ( ~ function(X20)
| ~ relation(X20)
| one_to_one(X20)
| apply(X20,esk4_1(X20)) = apply(X20,esk5_1(X20)) )
& ( ~ function(X20)
| ~ relation(X20)
| one_to_one(X20)
| in(esk5_1(X20),relation_dom(X20)) )
& ( ~ function(X20)
| ~ relation(X20)
| one_to_one(X20)
| in(esk4_1(X20),relation_dom(X20)) )
& ( ~ function(X20)
| ~ relation(X20)
| X21 = X22
| apply(X20,X21) != apply(X20,X22)
| ~ in(X22,relation_dom(X20))
| ~ in(X21,relation_dom(X20))
| ~ one_to_one(X20) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X56,X57] :
( ( subset(X56,singleton(X57))
| X56 != singleton(X57) )
& ( subset(X56,singleton(X57))
| X56 != empty_set )
& ( X56 = singleton(X57)
| X56 = empty_set
| ~ subset(X56,singleton(X57)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t39_zfmisc_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk17_0))
| subset(relation_inverse_image(esk17_0,singleton(apply(esk17_0,X1))),singleton(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| one_to_one(X1)
| apply(X1,esk4_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk5_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ one_to_one(esk17_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ subset(X1,singleton(X2))
| X1 = singleton(X2)
| X1 = empty_set ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk5_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| subset(relation_inverse_image(esk17_0,singleton(apply(esk17_0,esk4_1(esk17_0)))),singleton(esk5_1(esk17_0))) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
<=> relation_inverse_image(X2,singleton(X1)) != empty_set ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t142_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X67,X68] :
( X67 = X68
| ~ subset(singleton(X67),singleton(X68)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_zfmisc_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk5_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| relation_inverse_image(esk17_0,singleton(apply(esk17_0,esk4_1(esk17_0)))) = empty_set
| relation_inverse_image(esk17_0,singleton(apply(esk17_0,esk4_1(esk17_0)))) = singleton(esk5_1(esk17_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( ~ relation(X49)
| in(X48,relation_rng(X49))
| relation_inverse_image(X49,singleton(X48)) = empty_set )
& ( ~ relation(X49)
| relation_inverse_image(X49,singleton(X48)) != empty_set
| ~ in(X48,relation_rng(X49)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ subset(singleton(X1),singleton(X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk5_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| ~ in(esk4_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| subset(singleton(esk5_1(esk17_0)),singleton(esk4_1(esk17_0)))
| relation_inverse_image(esk17_0,singleton(apply(esk17_0,esk4_1(esk17_0)))) = empty_set ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X10,X11,X12,X14,X15,X16,X18] :
( ( ~ function(X10)
| ~ relation(X10)
| X16 = relation_rng(X10)
| in(esk2_2(X10,X16),X16)
| esk2_2(X10,X16) = apply(X10,esk3_2(X10,X16)) )
& ( ~ function(X10)
| ~ relation(X10)
| X16 = relation_rng(X10)
| in(esk2_2(X10,X16),X16)
| in(esk3_2(X10,X16),relation_dom(X10)) )
& ( ~ function(X10)
| ~ relation(X10)
| X16 = relation_rng(X10)
| esk2_2(X10,X16) != apply(X10,X18)
| ~ in(X18,relation_dom(X10))
| ~ in(esk2_2(X10,X16),X16) )
& ( ~ function(X10)
| ~ relation(X10)
| X11 != relation_rng(X10)
| in(X14,X11)
| X14 != apply(X10,X15)
| ~ in(X15,relation_dom(X10)) )
& ( ~ function(X10)
| ~ relation(X10)
| X11 != relation_rng(X10)
| ~ in(X12,X11)
| X12 = apply(X10,esk1_3(X10,X11,X12)) )
& ( ~ function(X10)
| ~ relation(X10)
| X11 != relation_rng(X10)
| ~ in(X12,X11)
| in(esk1_3(X10,X11,X12),relation_dom(X10)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ relation(X2)
| relation_inverse_image(X2,singleton(X1)) != empty_set
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk5_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| ~ in(esk4_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| esk5_1(esk17_0) = esk4_1(esk17_0)
| relation_inverse_image(esk17_0,singleton(apply(esk17_0,esk4_1(esk17_0)))) = empty_set ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| X4 != relation_rng(X2)
| X3 != apply(X2,X1)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
| in(X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk5_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| ~ in(esk4_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| ~ in(apply(esk17_0,esk4_1(esk17_0)),relation_rng(esk17_0))
| esk5_1(esk17_0) = esk4_1(esk17_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X3 != relation_rng(X1)
| in(apply(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk5_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| ~ in(esk4_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| esk5_1(esk17_0) = esk4_1(esk17_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| one_to_one(X1)
| in(esk5_1(X1),relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk4_1(esk17_0),relation_dom(esk17_0))
| esk5_1(esk17_0) = esk4_1(esk17_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| one_to_one(X1)
| in(esk4_1(X1),relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| esk4_1(X1) != esk5_1(X1)
| one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
esk5_1(esk17_0) = esk4_1(esk17_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SEU072+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.58 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.58 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.58 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.58 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.58 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.58 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:44:21 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.59 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.59 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.63 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.63 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.67 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1560459 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/5.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.67 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.67 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.67 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 1560467 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.15/5.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.67 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.67 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.67 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.67 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/5.67
% 0.15/5.67 % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/5.67 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.67 % Parsed axioms : 40
% 0.15/5.67 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Initial clauses : 73
% 0.15/5.67 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.15/5.67 % Initial clauses in saturation : 71
% 0.15/5.67 % Processed clauses : 235
% 0.15/5.67 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.15/5.67 % ...subsumed : 64
% 0.15/5.67 % ...remaining for further processing : 167
% 0.15/5.67 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.15/5.67 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Backward-subsumed : 9
% 0.15/5.67 % Backward-rewritten : 14
% 0.15/5.67 % Generated clauses : 542
% 0.15/5.67 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 497
% 0.15/5.67 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 0.15/5.67 % Paramodulations : 534
% 0.15/5.67 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.15/5.67 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.15/5.67 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Total rewrite steps : 152
% 0.15/5.67 % ...of those cached : 127
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.67 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.67 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.67 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.67 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.67 % Current number of processed clauses : 144
% 0.15/5.67 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 0.15/5.67 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.15/5.67 % Non-unit-clauses : 107
% 0.15/5.67 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 314
% 0.15/5.67 % ...number of literals in the above : 1431
% 0.15/5.67 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.15/5.67 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4038
% 0.15/5.67 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1772
% 0.15/5.67 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 60
% 0.15/5.67 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 309
% 0.15/5.67 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.15/5.67 % BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.15/5.67 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.67 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11476
% 0.15/5.67 % Search garbage collected termcells : 798
% 0.15/5.67
% 0.15/5.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.67 % User time : 0.020 s
% 0.15/5.67 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/5.67 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.15/5.67 % Maximum resident set size: 3664 pages
% 0.15/5.67
% 0.15/5.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.67 % User time : 0.079 s
% 0.15/5.67 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/5.67 % Total time : 0.098 s
% 0.15/5.67 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/5.67 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------