↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU076+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:28:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.15s 1.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  192 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   44 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  264 ( 107   ~; 115   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   22 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   84 (   0 sgn  33   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d12_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( X3 = relation_image(X1,X2)
        <=> ! [X4] :
              ( in(X4,X3)
            <=> ? [X5] :
                  ( X4 = apply(X1,X5)
                  & in(X5,X2)
                  & in(X5,relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d12_funct_1) ).

fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ( one_to_one(X1)
      <=> ! [X2,X3] :
            ( ( apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3)
              & in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
              & in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) )
           => X2 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

fof(t157_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( function(X3)
        & relation(X3) )
     => ( ( one_to_one(X3)
          & subset(X1,relation_dom(X3))
          & subset(relation_image(X3,X1),relation_image(X3,X2)) )
       => subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t157_funct_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X11,X12,X13,X14,X16,X17,X18,X19,X21] :
      ( ( ~ function(X11)
        | ~ relation(X11)
        | X19 = relation_image(X11,X18)
        | in(esk2_3(X11,X18,X19),X19)
        | esk2_3(X11,X18,X19) = apply(X11,esk3_3(X11,X18,X19)) )
      & ( ~ function(X11)
        | ~ relation(X11)
        | X19 = relation_image(X11,X18)
        | in(esk2_3(X11,X18,X19),X19)
        | in(esk3_3(X11,X18,X19),X18) )
      & ( ~ function(X11)
        | ~ relation(X11)
        | X19 = relation_image(X11,X18)
        | in(esk2_3(X11,X18,X19),X19)
        | in(esk3_3(X11,X18,X19),relation_dom(X11)) )
      & ( ~ function(X11)
        | ~ relation(X11)
        | X19 = relation_image(X11,X18)
        | esk2_3(X11,X18,X19) != apply(X11,X21)
        | ~ in(X21,X18)
        | ~ in(X21,relation_dom(X11))
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X11,X18,X19),X19) )
      & ( ~ function(X11)
        | ~ relation(X11)
        | X13 != relation_image(X11,X12)
        | in(X16,X13)
        | X16 != apply(X11,X17)
        | ~ in(X17,X12)
        | ~ in(X17,relation_dom(X11)) )
      & ( ~ function(X11)
        | ~ relation(X11)
        | X13 != relation_image(X11,X12)
        | ~ in(X14,X13)
        | X14 = apply(X11,esk1_4(X11,X12,X13,X14)) )
      & ( ~ function(X11)
        | ~ relation(X11)
        | X13 != relation_image(X11,X12)
        | ~ in(X14,X13)
        | in(esk1_4(X11,X12,X13,X14),X12) )
      & ( ~ function(X11)
        | ~ relation(X11)
        | X13 != relation_image(X11,X12)
        | ~ in(X14,X13)
        | in(esk1_4(X11,X12,X13,X14),relation_dom(X11)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d12_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31] :
      ( ( ~ function(X29)
        | ~ relation(X29)
        | one_to_one(X29)
        | esk5_1(X29) != esk6_1(X29) )
      & ( ~ function(X29)
        | ~ relation(X29)
        | one_to_one(X29)
        | apply(X29,esk5_1(X29)) = apply(X29,esk6_1(X29)) )
      & ( ~ function(X29)
        | ~ relation(X29)
        | one_to_one(X29)
        | in(esk6_1(X29),relation_dom(X29)) )
      & ( ~ function(X29)
        | ~ relation(X29)
        | one_to_one(X29)
        | in(esk5_1(X29),relation_dom(X29)) )
      & ( ~ function(X29)
        | ~ relation(X29)
        | X30 = X31
        | apply(X29,X30) != apply(X29,X31)
        | ~ in(X31,relation_dom(X29))
        | ~ in(X30,relation_dom(X29))
        | ~ one_to_one(X29) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | X4 != relation_image(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X4)
    | X1 = apply(X2,esk1_4(X2,X3,X4,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X3 != relation_image(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X4,X3)
    | in(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( function(X3)
          & relation(X3) )
       => ( ( one_to_one(X3)
            & subset(X1,relation_dom(X3))
            & subset(relation_image(X3,X1),relation_image(X3,X2)) )
         => subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t157_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X3 != relation_image(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X4,X3)
    | in(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | apply(X1,X2) != apply(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ one_to_one(X1)
    | X2 = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,relation_image(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | apply(X1,esk1_4(X1,X2,relation_image(X1,X2),X3)) = X3 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,relation_image(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | in(esk1_4(X1,X2,relation_image(X1,X2),X3),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ( subset(X26,X27)
        | ~ in(esk4_2(X26,X27),X27) )
      & ( subset(X26,X27)
        | in(esk4_2(X26,X27),X26) )
      & ( in(X25,X24)
        | ~ in(X25,X23)
        | ~ subset(X23,X24) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk18_0,esk19_0)
    & one_to_one(esk20_0)
    & subset(esk18_0,relation_dom(esk20_0))
    & subset(relation_image(esk20_0,esk18_0),relation_image(esk20_0,esk19_0))
    & function(esk20_0)
    & relation(esk20_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,relation_image(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | in(esk1_4(X1,X2,relation_image(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ in(apply(X1,X3),relation_image(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ one_to_one(X1)
    | esk1_4(X1,X2,relation_image(X1,X2),apply(X1,X3)) = X3 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_image(esk20_0,esk18_0),relation_image(esk20_0,esk19_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
    | ~ in(apply(X3,X1),relation_image(X3,X2))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ one_to_one(X3)
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_image(esk20_0,esk18_0))
    | in(X1,relation_image(esk20_0,esk19_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(esk20_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk20_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk20_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | X5 != relation_image(X2,X3)
    | X4 != apply(X2,X1)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | in(X4,X5) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk18_0,relation_dom(esk20_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk20_0))
    | ~ in(apply(esk20_0,X1),relation_image(esk20_0,esk18_0))
    | in(X1,esk19_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | in(apply(X1,X2),relation_image(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk18_0)
    | in(X1,relation_dom(esk20_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk18_0)
    | in(X1,esk19_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk4_2(X1,esk19_0),esk18_0)
    | subset(X1,esk19_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk18_0,esk19_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU076+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:49:06 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.15/1.13  % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.15/1.13  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.15/1.13  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1680198 completed with status 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.15/1.13  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.15/1.13  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.15/1.13  % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.15/1.13  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 5.15/1.13  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 136s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1680203 completed with status 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.15/1.13  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.15/1.13  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.15/1.13  % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.15/1.13  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 5.15/1.13  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.13  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 5.15/1.13  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.15/1.13  
% 5.15/1.13  % Proof found!
% 5.15/1.13  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.15/1.13  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.15/1.13  % Parsed axioms                        : 34
% 5.15/1.13  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Initial clauses                      : 69
% 5.15/1.13  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 5.15/1.13  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 67
% 5.15/1.13  % Processed clauses                    : 6629
% 5.15/1.13  % ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 5.15/1.13  % ...subsumed                          : 5653
% 5.15/1.13  % ...remaining for further processing  : 971
% 5.15/1.13  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 5.15/1.13  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Backward-subsumed                    : 207
% 5.15/1.13  % Backward-rewritten                   : 71
% 5.15/1.13  % Generated clauses                    : 29448
% 5.15/1.13  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27433
% 5.15/1.13  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 31
% 5.15/1.13  % Paramodulations                      : 29441
% 5.15/1.13  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % NegExts                              : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 5.15/1.13  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Total rewrite steps                  : 12316
% 5.15/1.13  % ...of those cached                   : 12226
% 5.15/1.13  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 5.15/1.13  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 5.15/1.13  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.15/1.13  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 5.15/1.13  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.15/1.13  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 5.15/1.13  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 5.15/1.13  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 5.15/1.13  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 5.15/1.13  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 5.15/1.13  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 5.15/1.13  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 5.15/1.13  % Current number of processed clauses  : 625
% 5.15/1.13  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 40
% 5.15/1.13  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.15/1.13  %    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 5.15/1.13  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 570
% 5.15/1.13  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19689
% 5.15/1.13  % ...number of literals in the above   : 92792
% 5.15/1.13  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Current number of archived clauses   : 342
% 5.15/1.13  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 149385
% 5.15/1.13  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 70812
% 5.15/1.13  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3723
% 5.15/1.13  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2487
% 5.15/1.13  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 27
% 5.15/1.13  % BW rewrite match successes           : 20
% 5.15/1.13  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 5.15/1.13  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 477237
% 5.15/1.13  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 821
% 5.15/1.13  
% 5.15/1.13  % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.15/1.13  % User time                : 0.576 s
% 5.15/1.13  % System time              : 0.021 s
% 5.15/1.13  % Total time               : 0.596 s
% 5.15/1.13  % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 5.15/1.13  
% 5.15/1.13  % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.15/1.13  % User time                : 3.271 s
% 5.15/1.13  % System time              : 0.127 s
% 5.15/1.13  % Total time               : 3.398 s
% 5.15/1.13  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 5.15/1.13  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------