↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU077+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:23:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.84s 1.00s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  173 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  237 (  97   ~; 104   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   0 sgn  35   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d13_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( X3 = relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)
        <=> ! [X4] :
              ( in(X4,X3)
            <=> ( in(apply(X1,X4),X2)
                & in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d13_funct_1) ).

fof(d5_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] :
                  ( X3 = apply(X1,X4)
                  & in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).

fof(t158_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( function(X3)
        & relation(X3) )
     => ( ( subset(X1,relation_rng(X3))
          & subset(relation_inverse_image(X3,X1),relation_inverse_image(X3,X2)) )
       => subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t158_funct_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | X16 = relation_inverse_image(X10,X15)
        | in(esk1_3(X10,X15,X16),X16)
        | in(apply(X10,esk1_3(X10,X15,X16)),X15) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | X16 = relation_inverse_image(X10,X15)
        | in(esk1_3(X10,X15,X16),X16)
        | in(esk1_3(X10,X15,X16),relation_dom(X10)) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | X16 = relation_inverse_image(X10,X15)
        | ~ in(apply(X10,esk1_3(X10,X15,X16)),X15)
        | ~ in(esk1_3(X10,X15,X16),relation_dom(X10))
        | ~ in(esk1_3(X10,X15,X16),X16) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | X12 != relation_inverse_image(X10,X11)
        | in(X14,X12)
        | ~ in(apply(X10,X14),X11)
        | ~ in(X14,relation_dom(X10)) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | X12 != relation_inverse_image(X10,X11)
        | ~ in(X13,X12)
        | in(apply(X10,X13),X11) )
      & ( ~ function(X10)
        | ~ relation(X10)
        | X12 != relation_inverse_image(X10,X11)
        | ~ in(X13,X12)
        | in(X13,relation_dom(X10)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d13_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X24,X25,X26,X28,X29,X30,X32] :
      ( ( ~ function(X24)
        | ~ relation(X24)
        | X30 = relation_rng(X24)
        | in(esk4_2(X24,X30),X30)
        | esk4_2(X24,X30) = apply(X24,esk5_2(X24,X30)) )
      & ( ~ function(X24)
        | ~ relation(X24)
        | X30 = relation_rng(X24)
        | in(esk4_2(X24,X30),X30)
        | in(esk5_2(X24,X30),relation_dom(X24)) )
      & ( ~ function(X24)
        | ~ relation(X24)
        | X30 = relation_rng(X24)
        | esk4_2(X24,X30) != apply(X24,X32)
        | ~ in(X32,relation_dom(X24))
        | ~ in(esk4_2(X24,X30),X30) )
      & ( ~ function(X24)
        | ~ relation(X24)
        | X25 != relation_rng(X24)
        | in(X28,X25)
        | X28 != apply(X24,X29)
        | ~ in(X29,relation_dom(X24)) )
      & ( ~ function(X24)
        | ~ relation(X24)
        | X25 != relation_rng(X24)
        | ~ in(X26,X25)
        | X26 = apply(X24,esk3_3(X24,X25,X26)) )
      & ( ~ function(X24)
        | ~ relation(X24)
        | X25 != relation_rng(X24)
        | ~ in(X26,X25)
        | in(esk3_3(X24,X25,X26),relation_dom(X24)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( function(X3)
          & relation(X3) )
       => ( ( subset(X1,relation_rng(X3))
            & subset(relation_inverse_image(X3,X1),relation_inverse_image(X3,X2)) )
         => subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t158_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X4 != relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | in(apply(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | X3 != relation_rng(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X1 = apply(X2,esk3_3(X2,X3,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( subset(X21,X22)
        | ~ in(esk2_2(X21,X22),X22) )
      & ( subset(X21,X22)
        | in(esk2_2(X21,X22),X21) )
      & ( in(X20,X19)
        | ~ in(X20,X18)
        | ~ subset(X18,X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk17_0,esk18_0)
    & subset(esk17_0,relation_rng(esk19_0))
    & subset(relation_inverse_image(esk19_0,esk17_0),relation_inverse_image(esk19_0,esk18_0))
    & function(esk19_0)
    & relation(esk19_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,relation_inverse_image(X1,X3))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | in(apply(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | apply(X1,esk3_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2)) = X2 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_inverse_image(esk19_0,esk17_0),relation_inverse_image(esk19_0,esk18_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | X4 != relation_inverse_image(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(apply(X2,X1),X3)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | in(X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | in(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_rng(X3))
    | ~ in(esk3_3(X3,relation_rng(X3),X1),relation_inverse_image(X3,X2))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_inverse_image(esk19_0,esk17_0))
    | in(X1,relation_inverse_image(esk19_0,esk18_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk19_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk19_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ in(apply(X2,X1),X3)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | in(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | in(esk3_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk17_0,relation_rng(esk19_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,relation_rng(esk19_0))
    | ~ in(esk3_3(esk19_0,relation_rng(esk19_0),X1),relation_inverse_image(esk19_0,esk17_0))
    | in(X1,esk18_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | in(esk3_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk17_0)
    | in(X1,relation_rng(esk19_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk17_0)
    | in(X1,esk18_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk2_2(X1,esk18_0),esk17_0)
    | subset(X1,esk18_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk17_0,esk18_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU077+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.44  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:44:41 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.84/1.00  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.84/1.00  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.84/1.00  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1561110 completed with status 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 3.84/1.00  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.84/1.00  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.84/1.00  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.84/1.00  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 3.84/1.00  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 136s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1561117 completed with status 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 3.84/1.00  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.84/1.00  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.84/1.00  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.84/1.00  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 3.84/1.00  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.84/1.00  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 3.84/1.00  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.84/1.00  
% 3.84/1.00  % Proof found!
% 3.84/1.00  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.84/1.00  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.84/1.00  % Parsed axioms                        : 36
% 3.84/1.00  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Initial clauses                      : 70
% 3.84/1.00  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 3.84/1.00  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 68
% 3.84/1.00  % Processed clauses                    : 3483
% 3.84/1.00  % ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 3.84/1.00  % ...subsumed                          : 2785
% 3.84/1.00  % ...remaining for further processing  : 694
% 3.84/1.00  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 3.84/1.00  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Backward-subsumed                    : 100
% 3.84/1.00  % Backward-rewritten                   : 23
% 3.84/1.00  % Generated clauses                    : 11909
% 3.84/1.00  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10803
% 3.84/1.00  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 22
% 3.84/1.00  % Paramodulations                      : 11897
% 3.84/1.00  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 3.84/1.00  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 3.84/1.00  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5329
% 3.84/1.00  % ...of those cached                   : 5257
% 3.84/1.00  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.84/1.00  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.84/1.00  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.84/1.00  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.84/1.00  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.84/1.00  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.84/1.00  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.84/1.00  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.84/1.00  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.84/1.00  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.84/1.00  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.84/1.00  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.84/1.00  % Current number of processed clauses  : 500
% 3.84/1.00  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 42
% 3.84/1.00  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.84/1.00  %    Negative unit clauses             : 17
% 3.84/1.00  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 441
% 3.84/1.00  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7231
% 3.84/1.00  % ...number of literals in the above   : 34584
% 3.84/1.00  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Current number of archived clauses   : 188
% 3.84/1.00  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 70483
% 3.84/1.00  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33570
% 3.84/1.00  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2241
% 3.84/1.00  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1274
% 3.84/1.00  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 25
% 3.84/1.00  % BW rewrite match successes           : 18
% 3.84/1.00  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.84/1.00  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 160879
% 3.84/1.00  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 833
% 3.84/1.00  
% 3.84/1.00  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.84/1.00  % User time                : 0.441 s
% 3.84/1.00  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 3.84/1.00  % Total time               : 0.456 s
% 3.84/1.00  % Maximum resident set size: 3404 pages
% 3.84/1.00  
% 3.84/1.00  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.84/1.00  % User time                : 2.104 s
% 3.84/1.00  % System time              : 0.085 s
% 3.84/1.00  % Total time               : 2.190 s
% 3.84/1.00  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 3.84/1.00  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------