↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU090+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:51:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 15.69s
% Output   : Refutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  30   ~;  19   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (  36   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3) = cartesian_product2(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( finite(X0)
        & finite(X1) )
     => finite(cartesian_product2(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc14_finset_1) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( finite(X0)
        & finite(X1)
        & finite(X2) )
     => finite(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc15_finset_1) ).

fof(f56,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( finite(X0)
        & finite(X1)
        & finite(X2)
        & finite(X3) )
     => finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_finset_1) ).

fof(f57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( finite(X0)
          & finite(X1)
          & finite(X2)
          & finite(X3) )
       => finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f56]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product2(X0,X1))
      | ~ finite(X0)
      | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product2(X0,X1))
      | ~ finite(X0)
      | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2))
      | ~ finite(X0)
      | ~ finite(X1)
      | ~ finite(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2))
      | ~ finite(X0)
      | ~ finite(X1)
      | ~ finite(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3))
      & finite(X0)
      & finite(X1)
      & finite(X2)
      & finite(X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3))
      & finite(X0)
      & finite(X1)
      & finite(X2)
      & finite(X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f121]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ( ~ finite(cartesian_product4(sK26,sK27,sK28,sK29))
    & finite(sK26)
    & finite(sK27)
    & finite(sK28)
    & finite(sK29) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK26,sK27,sK28,sK29]),skolemize(X0,sK26),skolemize(X1,sK27),skolemize(X2,sK28),skolemize(X3,sK29)],[f122]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3) = cartesian_product2(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2),X3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product2(X0,X1))
      | ~ finite(X0)
      | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2))
      | ~ finite(X0)
      | ~ finite(X1)
      | ~ finite(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f277,plain,
    finite(sK29),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).

fof(f278,plain,
    finite(sK28),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).

fof(f279,plain,
    finite(sK27),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).

fof(f280,plain,
    finite(sK26),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).

fof(f281,plain,
    ~ finite(cartesian_product4(sK26,sK27,sK28,sK29)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f158]) ).

fof(f290,plain,
    ~ finite(cartesian_product2(cartesian_product3(sK26,sK27,sK28),sK29)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f281,f182]) ).

fof(f430,plain,
    ( ~ finite(cartesian_product3(sK26,sK27,sK28))
    | ~ finite(sK29) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f186,f290]) ).

fof(f431,plain,
    ~ finite(cartesian_product3(sK26,sK27,sK28)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f430,f277]) ).

fof(f495,plain,
    ( ~ finite(sK26)
    | ~ finite(sK27)
    | ~ finite(sK28) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f187,f431]) ).

fof(f496,plain,
    ( ~ finite(sK27)
    | ~ finite(sK28) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f495,f280]) ).

fof(f497,plain,
    ~ finite(sK28),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f496,f279]) ).

fof(f498,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f497,f278]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU090+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/15.61  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/15.61  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/15.61  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/15.61  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/15.61  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/15.61  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/15.61  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/15.61  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:35:42 UTC 2026
% 0.11/15.62  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/15.62  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/15.65  Running first-order model finding
% 0.11/15.65  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123301)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=515896893:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-4123301-4123309"...
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123307)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)...printing done.
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.11/15.69  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/15.69  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)------------------------------
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123309)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.11/15.69  % (4123301)Success in time 0.029 s
% 0.11/15.69  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------