↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU105+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.61s 1.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  168 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  190 (  80   ~;  70   |;  27   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (   1 sgn  77   !;   6   ?;  21   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f21,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_intersection2(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_difference(X0,X1) = symmetric_difference(X0,set_intersection2(X0,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t100_xboole_1) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( preboolean(X0)
    <=> ! [X1,X2] :
          ( ( in(X2,X0)
            & in(X1,X0) )
         => ( in(set_difference(X1,X2),X0)
            & in(set_union2(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_finsub_1) ).

fof(f34,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ empty(X0)
     => ( ! [X1] :
            ( element(X1,X0)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( element(X2,X0)
               => ( in(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X0)
                  & in(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X0) ) ) )
       => preboolean(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t16_finsub_1) ).

fof(f35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ~ empty(X0)
       => ( ! [X1] :
              ( element(X1,X0)
             => ! [X2] :
                  ( element(X2,X0)
                 => ( in(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X0)
                    & in(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X0) ) ) )
         => preboolean(X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f34]) ).

fof(f37,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
     => element(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).

fof(f49,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_union2(X0,X1) = symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(X0,X1),set_intersection2(X0,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t94_xboole_1) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X0] : set_intersection2(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(rectify,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( preboolean(X0)
    <=> ! [X1,X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X0)
          | ~ in(X1,X0)
          | ( in(set_difference(X1,X2),X0)
            & in(set_union2(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( preboolean(X0)
    <=> ! [X1,X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X0)
          | ~ in(X1,X0)
          | ( in(set_difference(X1,X2),X0)
            & in(set_union2(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f80]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ~ empty(X0)
      & ! [X1] :
          ( ~ element(X1,X0)
          | ! [X2] :
              ( ~ element(X2,X0)
              | ( in(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X0)
                & in(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X0) ) ) )
      & ~ preboolean(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ~ empty(X0)
      & ! [X1] :
          ( ~ element(X1,X0)
          | ! [X2] :
              ( ~ element(X2,X0)
              | ( in(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X0)
                & in(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X0) ) ) )
      & ~ preboolean(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | element(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ preboolean(X0)
        | ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X0)
            | ~ in(X1,X0)
            | ( in(set_difference(X1,X2),X0)
              & in(set_union2(X1,X2),X0) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X1,X2] :
            ( in(X2,X0)
            & in(X1,X0)
            & ( ~ in(set_difference(X1,X2),X0)
              | ~ in(set_union2(X1,X2),X0) ) )
        | preboolean(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f81]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ preboolean(X0)
        | ! [X3,X4] :
            ( ~ in(X4,X0)
            | ~ in(X3,X0)
            | ( in(set_difference(X3,X4),X0)
              & in(set_union2(X3,X4),X0) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X1,X2] :
            ( in(X2,X0)
            & in(X1,X0)
            & ( ~ in(set_difference(X1,X2),X0)
              | ~ in(set_union2(X1,X2),X0) ) )
        | preboolean(X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ preboolean(X0)
        | ! [X3,X4] :
            ( ~ in(X4,X0)
            | ~ in(X3,X0)
            | ( in(set_difference(X3,X4),X0)
              & in(set_union2(X3,X4),X0) ) ) )
      & ( ( in(sK11(X0),X0)
          & in(sK10(X0),X0)
          & ( ~ in(set_difference(sK10(X0),sK11(X0)),X0)
            | ~ in(set_union2(sK10(X0),sK11(X0)),X0) ) )
        | preboolean(X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK10,sK11]),skolemize(X1,sK10(X0)),skolemize(X2,sK11(X0))],[f105]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ( ~ empty(sK12)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( ~ element(X1,sK12)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ element(X2,sK12)
            | ( in(set_intersection2(X1,X2),sK12)
              & in(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),sK12) ) ) )
    & ~ preboolean(sK12) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK12]),skolemize(X0,sK12)],[f83]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    ! [X0] : set_intersection2(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f152,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_difference(X0,X1) = symmetric_difference(X0,set_intersection2(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( in(sK11(X0),X0)
      | preboolean(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( in(sK10(X0),X0)
      | preboolean(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ in(set_difference(sK10(X0),sK11(X0)),X0)
      | ~ in(set_union2(sK10(X0),sK11(X0)),X0)
      | preboolean(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ element(X1,sK12)
      | ~ element(X2,sK12)
      | in(set_intersection2(X1,X2),sK12) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ element(X1,sK12)
      | ~ element(X2,sK12)
      | in(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),sK12) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ~ preboolean(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | element(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_union2(X0,X1) = symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(X0,X1),set_intersection2(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ in(symmetric_difference(sK10(X0),set_intersection2(sK10(X0),sK11(X0))),X0)
      | ~ in(symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(sK10(X0),sK11(X0)),set_intersection2(sK10(X0),sK11(X0))),X0)
      | preboolean(X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f157,f175,f152]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : set_intersection2(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f129]) ).

tcf(c_93,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( preboolean(X0)
      | ~ in(symmetric_difference(sK10(X0),set_intersection2(sK10(X0),sK11(X0))),X0)
      | ~ in(symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(sK10(X0),sK11(X0)),set_intersection2(sK10(X0),sK11(X0))),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f183]) ).

tcf(c_94,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( preboolean(X0)
      | in(sK10(X0),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f156]) ).

tcf(c_95,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( preboolean(X0)
      | in(sK11(X0),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f155]) ).

tcf(c_98,negated_conjecture,
    ~ preboolean(sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f161]) ).

tcf(c_99,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(symmetric_difference(X0,X1),sK12)
      | ~ element(X1,sK12)
      | ~ element(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f160]) ).

tcf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(set_intersection2(X0,X1),sK12)
      | ~ element(X1,sK12)
      | ~ element(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f159]) ).

tcf(c_103,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( element(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163]) ).

tcf(c_1209,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(set_intersection2(X0,X1),sK12)
      | ~ element(X1,sK12)
      | ~ element(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_100]) ).

tcf(c_1210,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(symmetric_difference(X0,X1),sK12)
      | ~ element(X1,sK12)
      | ~ element(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tcf(c_1211,negated_conjecture,
    ~ preboolean(sK12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98]) ).

tcf(c_1650,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(X0,sK12)
      | ~ element(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_1209]) ).

tcf(c_1721,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( preboolean(X0)
      | element(sK10(X0),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_1722,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( preboolean(X0)
      | element(sK11(X0),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_1723,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( element(symmetric_difference(X0,X1),sK12)
      | ~ element(X1,sK12)
      | ~ element(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1210,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_1724,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( element(set_intersection2(X0,X1),sK12)
      | ~ element(X1,sK12)
      | ~ element(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1209,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_1744,plain,
    ( preboolean(sK12)
    | in(sK10(sK12),sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1721,c_1650]) ).

tcf(c_1745,plain,
    in(sK10(sK12),sK12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1744,c_1211]) ).

tcf(c_1746,plain,
    element(sK10(sK12),sK12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1745,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_2377,plain,
    ( preboolean(sK12)
    | in(sK11(sK12),sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1722,c_1650]) ).

tcf(c_2379,plain,
    in(sK11(sK12),sK12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2377,c_1211]) ).

tcf(c_2396,plain,
    element(sK11(sK12),sK12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2379,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_2683,plain,
    ( preboolean(sK12)
    | ~ element(set_intersection2(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12)
    | ~ element(symmetric_difference(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12)
    | ~ in(symmetric_difference(sK10(sK12),set_intersection2(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12))),sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1210,c_93]) ).

tcf(c_2684,plain,
    ( ~ element(set_intersection2(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12)
    | ~ element(symmetric_difference(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12)
    | ~ in(symmetric_difference(sK10(sK12),set_intersection2(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12))),sK12) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2683,c_1211]) ).

tcf(c_2865,plain,
    ( ~ element(sK10(sK12),sK12)
    | ~ element(set_intersection2(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12)
    | ~ element(symmetric_difference(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1210,c_2684]) ).

tcf(c_2866,plain,
    ( ~ element(set_intersection2(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12)
    | ~ element(symmetric_difference(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2865,c_1746]) ).

tcf(c_2875,plain,
    ( ~ element(sK11(sK12),sK12)
    | ~ element(sK10(sK12),sK12)
    | ~ element(set_intersection2(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1723,c_2866]) ).

tcf(c_2876,plain,
    ~ element(set_intersection2(sK10(sK12),sK11(sK12)),sK12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2875,c_2396,c_1746]) ).

tcf(c_2879,plain,
    ( ~ element(sK11(sK12),sK12)
    | ~ element(sK10(sK12),sK12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1724,c_2876]) ).

tcf(c_2880,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2879,c_2396,c_1746]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU105+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:34 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.61/1.07  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.07  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.61/1.07  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.61/1.07  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 4  sf_s  rm: 13 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Proving...
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % 
% 1.61/1.07  % clauses                               46
% 1.61/1.07  % conjectures                           4
% 1.61/1.07  % EPR                                   14
% 1.61/1.07  % Horn                                  40
% 1.61/1.07  % unary                                 23
% 1.61/1.07  % binary                                14
% 1.61/1.07  % lits                                  80
% 1.61/1.07  % lits eq                               10
% 1.61/1.07  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.61/1.07  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.61/1.07  % fd_cond                               1
% 1.61/1.07  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 1.61/1.07  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ 
% 1.61/1.07  % Current options:
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ 
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % 
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % ------ Proving...
% 1.61/1.07  % 
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.61/1.07  
% 1.61/1.07  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------