↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU106+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.19s 1.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  100 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  106 (  44   ~;  40   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   1 sgn  34   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t10_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( preboolean(X1)
    <=> ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ( in(X2,X1)
            & in(X3,X1) )
         => ( in(set_union2(X2,X3),X1)
            & in(set_difference(X2,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_finsub_1) ).

fof(t100_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_difference(X1,X2) = symmetric_difference(X1,set_intersection2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t100_xboole_1) ).

fof(t95_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X2) = symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t95_xboole_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k5_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = symmetric_difference(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k5_xboole_0) ).

fof(t17_finsub_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ empty(X1)
     => ( ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,X1)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( element(X3,X1)
               => ( in(symmetric_difference(X2,X3),X1)
                  & in(set_union2(X2,X3),X1) ) ) )
       => preboolean(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_finsub_1) ).

fof(t1_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => element(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).

fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X139,X140,X141,X142] :
      ( ( in(set_union2(X140,X141),X139)
        | ~ in(X140,X139)
        | ~ in(X141,X139)
        | ~ preboolean(X139) )
      & ( in(set_difference(X140,X141),X139)
        | ~ in(X140,X139)
        | ~ in(X141,X139)
        | ~ preboolean(X139) )
      & ( in(esk11_1(X142),X142)
        | preboolean(X142) )
      & ( in(esk12_1(X142),X142)
        | preboolean(X142) )
      & ( ~ in(set_union2(esk11_1(X142),esk12_1(X142)),X142)
        | ~ in(set_difference(esk11_1(X142),esk12_1(X142)),X142)
        | preboolean(X142) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t10_finsub_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X137,X138] : set_difference(X137,X138) = symmetric_difference(X137,set_intersection2(X137,X138)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t100_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X170,X171] : set_intersection2(X170,X171) = symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(X170,X171),set_union2(X170,X171)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t95_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( preboolean(X1)
    | ~ in(set_union2(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1)
    | ~ in(set_difference(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    set_difference(X1,X2) = symmetric_difference(X1,set_intersection2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X99,X100] : symmetric_difference(X99,X100) = symmetric_difference(X100,X99),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k5_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ~ empty(X1)
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ( element(X2,X1)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( element(X3,X1)
                 => ( in(symmetric_difference(X2,X3),X1)
                    & in(set_union2(X2,X3),X1) ) ) )
         => preboolean(X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t17_finsub_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( preboolean(X1)
    | ~ in(set_union2(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1)
    | ~ in(symmetric_difference(esk11_1(X1),symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),set_union2(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)))),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = symmetric_difference(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X146,X147] :
      ( ~ empty(esk13_0)
      & ( in(symmetric_difference(X146,X147),esk13_0)
        | ~ element(X147,esk13_0)
        | ~ element(X146,esk13_0) )
      & ( in(set_union2(X146,X147),esk13_0)
        | ~ element(X147,esk13_0)
        | ~ element(X146,esk13_0) )
      & ~ preboolean(esk13_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X149,X150] :
      ( ~ in(X149,X150)
      | element(X149,X150) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X120] : set_union2(X120,X120) = X120,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k2_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( preboolean(X1)
    | ~ in(symmetric_difference(esk11_1(X1),symmetric_difference(set_union2(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),symmetric_difference(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)))),X1)
    | ~ in(set_union2(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X2,esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X1,esk13_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ preboolean(esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(set_union2(X1,X2),esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X2,esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X1,esk13_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(symmetric_difference(set_union2(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk12_1(esk13_0)),symmetric_difference(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk12_1(esk13_0))),esk13_0)
    | ~ element(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk13_0)
    | ~ in(set_union2(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk12_1(esk13_0)),esk13_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X2,esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X1,esk13_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X1,esk13_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(symmetric_difference(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk12_1(esk13_0)),esk13_0)
    | ~ element(set_union2(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk12_1(esk13_0)),esk13_0)
    | ~ element(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk13_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(set_union2(X1,X2),esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X2,esk13_0)
    | ~ element(X1,esk13_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( in(esk12_1(X1),X1)
    | preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk13_0)
    | ~ element(esk12_1(esk13_0),esk13_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_27]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( element(esk12_1(X1),X1)
    | preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( in(esk11_1(X1),X1)
    | preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ element(esk11_1(esk13_0),esk13_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( element(esk11_1(X1),X1)
    | preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_22]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.19  % Problem    : SEU106+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.19  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.43  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.43  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.43  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.43  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.43  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.43  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:43:50 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.45  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.46  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.19/1.88  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.19/1.88  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.19/1.88  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.19/1.88  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.19/1.88  % Total time : 1.383s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------