↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU107+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  35   ~;  33   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   2 sgn  33   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(dt_k2_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X1)
        & preboolean(X1)
        & element(X2,X1)
        & element(X3,X1) )
     => element(prebool_difference(X1,X2,X3),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_finsub_1) ).

fof(redefinition_k2_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X1)
        & preboolean(X1)
        & element(X2,X1)
        & element(X3,X1) )
     => prebool_difference(X1,X2,X3) = set_difference(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k2_finsub_1) ).

fof(t37_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t18_finsub_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X1)
        & preboolean(X1) )
     => in(empty_set,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t18_finsub_1) ).

fof(t2_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,X2)
     => ( empty(X2)
        | in(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).

fof(existence_m1_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2] : element(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X1)
        & preboolean(X1)
        & element(X2,X1)
        & element(X3,X1) )
     => element(prebool_difference(X1,X2,X3),X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_finsub_1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X1)
        & preboolean(X1)
        & element(X2,X1)
        & element(X3,X1) )
     => prebool_difference(X1,X2,X3) = set_difference(X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k2_finsub_1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X67,X68,X69] :
      ( empty(X67)
      | ~ preboolean(X67)
      | ~ element(X68,X67)
      | ~ element(X69,X67)
      | element(prebool_difference(X67,X68,X69),X67) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X89,X90,X91] :
      ( empty(X89)
      | ~ preboolean(X89)
      | ~ element(X90,X89)
      | ~ element(X91,X89)
      | prebool_difference(X89,X90,X91) = set_difference(X90,X91) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X98,X99] :
      ( ( set_difference(X98,X99) != empty_set
        | subset(X98,X99) )
      & ( ~ subset(X98,X99)
        | set_difference(X98,X99) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t37_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X92] : subset(X92,X92),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ empty(X1)
          & preboolean(X1) )
       => in(empty_set,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t18_finsub_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( empty(X1)
    | element(prebool_difference(X1,X2,X3),X1)
    | ~ preboolean(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,X1)
    | ~ element(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( empty(X1)
    | prebool_difference(X1,X2,X3) = set_difference(X2,X3)
    | ~ preboolean(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,X1)
    | ~ element(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ empty(esk11_0)
    & preboolean(esk11_0)
    & ~ in(empty_set,esk11_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X96,X97] :
      ( ~ element(X96,X97)
      | empty(X97)
      | in(X96,X97) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( element(set_difference(X1,X2),X3)
    | empty(X3)
    | ~ element(X2,X3)
    | ~ element(X1,X3)
    | ~ preboolean(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    set_difference(X1,X1) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X70] : element(esk1_1(X70),X70),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[existence_m1_subset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(empty_set,esk11_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( empty(X2)
    | in(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty(esk11_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( element(empty_set,X1)
    | empty(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,X1)
    | ~ preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    element(esk1_1(X1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ element(empty_set,esk11_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( element(empty_set,X1)
    | empty(X1)
    | ~ preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    preboolean(esk11_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU107+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.32  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:43:43 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------