↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU108+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 20.44s 12.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 20.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  118 (  48   ~;  51   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (   2 sgn  45   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t7_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( in(X1,X2)
        & empty(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).

fof(t10_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( preboolean(X1)
    <=> ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ( in(X2,X1)
            & in(X3,X1) )
         => ( in(set_union2(X2,X3),X1)
            & in(set_difference(X2,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_finsub_1) ).

fof(t2_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,X2)
     => ( empty(X2)
        | in(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).

fof(dt_k6_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
        & element(X3,powerset(X1)) )
     => element(subset_difference(X1,X2,X3),powerset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_subset_1) ).

fof(redefinition_k6_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
        & element(X3,powerset(X1)) )
     => subset_difference(X1,X2,X3) = set_difference(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k6_subset_1) ).

fof(t1_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => element(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).

fof(dt_k4_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
        & element(X3,powerset(X1)) )
     => element(subset_union2(X1,X2,X3),powerset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k4_subset_1) ).

fof(redefinition_k4_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
        & element(X3,powerset(X1)) )
     => subset_union2(X1,X2,X3) = set_union2(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k4_subset_1) ).

fof(t20_finsub_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : preboolean(powerset(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t20_finsub_1) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X161,X162] :
      ( ~ in(X161,X162)
      | ~ empty(X162) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_boole])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X138,X139,X140,X141] :
      ( ( in(set_union2(X139,X140),X138)
        | ~ in(X139,X138)
        | ~ in(X140,X138)
        | ~ preboolean(X138) )
      & ( in(set_difference(X139,X140),X138)
        | ~ in(X139,X138)
        | ~ in(X140,X138)
        | ~ preboolean(X138) )
      & ( in(esk11_1(X141),X141)
        | preboolean(X141) )
      & ( in(esk12_1(X141),X141)
        | preboolean(X141) )
      & ( ~ in(set_union2(esk11_1(X141),esk12_1(X141)),X141)
        | ~ in(set_difference(esk11_1(X141),esk12_1(X141)),X141)
        | preboolean(X141) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t10_finsub_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X148,X149] :
      ( ~ element(X148,X149)
      | empty(X149)
      | in(X148,X149) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ empty(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(esk11_1(X1),X1)
    | preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( preboolean(X1)
    | ~ in(set_union2(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1)
    | ~ in(set_difference(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( empty(X2)
    | in(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( preboolean(X1)
    | ~ empty(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X99,X100,X101] :
      ( ~ element(X100,powerset(X99))
      | ~ element(X101,powerset(X99))
      | element(subset_difference(X99,X100,X101),powerset(X99)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X134,X135,X136] :
      ( ~ element(X135,powerset(X134))
      | ~ element(X136,powerset(X134))
      | subset_difference(X134,X135,X136) = set_difference(X135,X136) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k6_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X145,X146] :
      ( ~ in(X145,X146)
      | element(X145,X146) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( preboolean(X1)
    | ~ element(set_difference(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1)
    | ~ in(set_union2(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( element(subset_difference(X2,X1,X3),powerset(X2))
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset_difference(X2,X1,X3) = set_difference(X1,X3)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( in(esk12_1(X1),X1)
    | preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X96,X97,X98] :
      ( ~ element(X97,powerset(X96))
      | ~ element(X98,powerset(X96))
      | element(subset_union2(X96,X97,X98),powerset(X96)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k4_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X131,X132,X133] :
      ( ~ element(X132,powerset(X131))
      | ~ element(X133,powerset(X131))
      | subset_union2(X131,X132,X133) = set_union2(X132,X133) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k4_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : preboolean(powerset(X1)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t20_finsub_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( preboolean(X1)
    | ~ element(set_difference(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1)
    | ~ element(set_union2(esk11_1(X1),esk12_1(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( element(set_difference(X1,X2),powerset(X3))
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X3))
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( element(esk11_1(X1),X1)
    | preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( element(esk12_1(X1),X1)
    | preboolean(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( element(subset_union2(X2,X1,X3),powerset(X2))
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( subset_union2(X2,X1,X3) = set_union2(X1,X3)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ preboolean(powerset(esk13_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( preboolean(powerset(X1))
    | ~ element(set_union2(esk11_1(powerset(X1)),esk12_1(powerset(X1))),powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( element(set_union2(X1,X2),powerset(X3))
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X3))
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ preboolean(powerset(esk13_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    preboolean(powerset(X1)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SEU108+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.06/0.30  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 21:43:26 EDT 2026
% 0.06/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.06/0.31  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 20.44/12.76  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 20.44/12.76  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 20.44/12.76  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 20.44/12.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 20.55/12.85  % Total time : 9.368s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------