↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU113+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   96 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  104 (  38   ~;  41   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   2 sgn  30   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fc1_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ empty(powerset(X1))
      & cup_closed(powerset(X1))
      & diff_closed(powerset(X1))
      & preboolean(powerset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_finsub_1) ).

fof(t2_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,X2)
     => ( empty(X2)
        | in(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

fof(d5_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( preboolean(X2)
     => ( X2 = finite_subsets(X1)
      <=> ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X2)
          <=> ( subset(X3,X1)
              & finite(X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_finsub_1) ).

fof(dt_k5_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : preboolean(finite_subsets(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_finsub_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t26_finsub_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : subset(finite_subsets(X1),powerset(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_finsub_1) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ empty(powerset(X1))
      & cup_closed(powerset(X1))
      & diff_closed(powerset(X1))
      & preboolean(powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc1_finsub_1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X103,X104] :
      ( ~ element(X103,X104)
      | empty(X104)
      | in(X103,X104) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X105,X106] :
      ( ( ~ element(X105,powerset(X106))
        | subset(X105,X106) )
      & ( ~ subset(X105,X106)
        | element(X105,powerset(X106)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X82] :
      ( ~ empty(powerset(X82))
      & cup_closed(powerset(X82))
      & diff_closed(powerset(X82))
      & preboolean(powerset(X82)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X74,X75,X76,X77] :
      ( ( subset(X76,X74)
        | ~ in(X76,X75)
        | X75 != finite_subsets(X74)
        | ~ preboolean(X75) )
      & ( finite(X76)
        | ~ in(X76,X75)
        | X75 != finite_subsets(X74)
        | ~ preboolean(X75) )
      & ( ~ subset(X77,X74)
        | ~ finite(X77)
        | in(X77,X75)
        | X75 != finite_subsets(X74)
        | ~ preboolean(X75) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_2(X74,X75),X75)
        | ~ subset(esk2_2(X74,X75),X74)
        | ~ finite(esk2_2(X74,X75))
        | X75 = finite_subsets(X74)
        | ~ preboolean(X75) )
      & ( subset(esk2_2(X74,X75),X74)
        | in(esk2_2(X74,X75),X75)
        | X75 = finite_subsets(X74)
        | ~ preboolean(X75) )
      & ( finite(esk2_2(X74,X75))
        | in(esk2_2(X74,X75),X75)
        | X75 = finite_subsets(X74)
        | ~ preboolean(X75) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_finsub_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X79] : preboolean(finite_subsets(X79)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_finsub_1]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X68,X69,X70,X71,X72] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X68,X69)
        | ~ in(X70,X68)
        | in(X70,X69) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X71,X72),X71)
        | subset(X71,X72) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X71,X72),X72)
        | subset(X71,X72) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( empty(X2)
    | in(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ~ empty(powerset(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X3 != finite_subsets(X2)
    | ~ preboolean(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    preboolean(finite_subsets(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : subset(finite_subsets(X1),powerset(X1)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_finsub_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( in(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,finite_subsets(X2)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(finite_subsets(esk13_0),powerset(esk13_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subset(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(esk1_2(X1,powerset(X2)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( subset(esk1_2(finite_subsets(X1),X2),X1)
    | subset(finite_subsets(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(finite_subsets(esk13_0),powerset(esk13_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    subset(finite_subsets(X1),powerset(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU113+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:43:24 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.29/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.29/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------