↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SEU115+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:42:34 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 7.64s 1.81s
% Output   : Proof 9.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU115+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 15:06:08 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.58  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.58  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.58  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.58  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.58  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.58  
% 0.21/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.58  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.58  
% 0.21/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.58  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.58                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.58  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.58  
% 0.21/0.59  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.59  
% 0.21/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.63  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.63  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.63  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.63  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.63  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.43/1.07  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.43/1.07  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.04/1.11  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.04/1.11  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.04/1.12  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.04/1.12  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.04/1.12  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.05/1.55  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.05/1.58  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 5.05/1.60  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.05/1.63  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.75/1.64  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 6.80/1.64  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.80/1.66  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.80/1.68  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.80/1.69  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.24/1.72  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 3: proved (1185ms)
% 7.64/1.81  
% 7.64/1.81  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.64/1.81  
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 0: stopped
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 2: stopped
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 5: stopped
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 6: stopped
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 7.64/1.81  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 7.64/1.82  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 8.37/1.87  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 8.37/1.88  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 8.37/1.88  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 8.37/1.88  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 8.37/1.89  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 9.00/1.99  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.00/1.99  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.00/2.00  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.00/2.00  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.42/2.00  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.42/2.01  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.42/2.02  Prover 1: Found proof (size 35)
% 9.42/2.02  Prover 1: proved (1400ms)
% 9.42/2.02  Prover 4: stopped
% 9.42/2.02  Prover 10: stopped
% 9.42/2.02  Prover 13: stopped
% 9.42/2.03  Prover 7: stopped
% 9.42/2.04  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.42/2.05  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.78/2.06  Prover 8: stopped
% 9.78/2.08  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.78/2.09  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.78/2.10  Prover 11: stopped
% 9.78/2.10  
% 9.78/2.10  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.78/2.10  
% 9.78/2.10  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.78/2.11  Assumptions after simplification:
% 9.78/2.11  ---------------------------------
% 9.78/2.11  
% 9.78/2.11    (rc2_finset_1)
% 9.78/2.13     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (powerset(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: $i]
% 9.78/2.13      : (relation(v2) = 0 & function(v2) = 0 & one_to_one(v2) = 0 &
% 9.78/2.13        epsilon_transitive(v2) = 0 & epsilon_connected(v2) = 0 & ordinal(v2) = 0 &
% 9.78/2.13        natural(v2) = 0 & finite(v2) = 0 & empty(v2) = 0 & element(v2, v1) = 0 &
% 9.78/2.13        $i(v2)))
% 9.78/2.13  
% 9.78/2.13    (rc2_subset_1)
% 9.78/2.13     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (powerset(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: $i]
% 9.78/2.13      : (empty(v2) = 0 & element(v2, v1) = 0 & $i(v2)))
% 9.78/2.13  
% 9.78/2.13    (t1_zfmisc_1)
% 9.78/2.14    $i(empty_set) &  ? [v0: $i] : (singleton(empty_set) = v0 & powerset(empty_set)
% 9.78/2.14      = v0 & $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.14  
% 9.78/2.14    (t27_finsub_1)
% 9.78/2.14     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (finite_subsets(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 9.78/2.14      [v2: any] :  ? [v3: $i] : (finite(v0) = v2 & powerset(v0) = v3 & $i(v3) & (
% 9.78/2.14          ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = v1)))
% 9.78/2.14  
% 9.78/2.14    (t28_finsub_1)
% 9.78/2.14    $i(empty_set) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) &
% 9.78/2.14      singleton(empty_set) = v1 & finite_subsets(empty_set) = v0 & $i(v1) &
% 9.78/2.14      $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.14  
% 9.78/2.14    (t6_boole)
% 9.78/2.14    $i(empty_set) &  ! [v0: $i] : (v0 = empty_set |  ~ (empty(v0) = 0) |  ~
% 9.78/2.14      $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.14  
% 9.78/2.14    (t8_boole)
% 9.78/2.14     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v1) = 0) |  ~ (empty(v0) = 0)
% 9.78/2.14      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.14  
% 9.78/2.14    (function-axioms)
% 9.78/2.15     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 9.78/2.15    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 9.78/2.15     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 9.78/2.15    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.78/2.15      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 9.78/2.15    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.78/2.15      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 9.78/2.15      ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool]
% 9.78/2.15    :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (function(v2) = v1)
% 9.78/2.15      |  ~ (function(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 9.78/2.15      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (one_to_one(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.78/2.15      (one_to_one(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 9.78/2.15      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (epsilon_transitive(v2) =
% 9.78/2.15        v1) |  ~ (epsilon_transitive(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 9.78/2.15    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (epsilon_connected(v2) =
% 9.78/2.15        v1) |  ~ (epsilon_connected(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 9.78/2.15    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ordinal(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.78/2.15      (ordinal(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 9.78/2.15      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (natural(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.78/2.15      (natural(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 9.78/2.15      ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.78/2.15      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 9.78/2.15      ~ (cap_closed(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cap_closed(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 9.78/2.15      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (finite_subsets(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.78/2.15      (finite_subsets(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 9.78/2.15      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (finite(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.78/2.15      (finite(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool]
% 9.78/2.15    :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (diff_closed(v2) = v1) |  ~ (diff_closed(v2) =
% 9.78/2.15        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 9.78/2.15      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (preboolean(v2) = v1) |  ~ (preboolean(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 9.78/2.15    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 9.78/2.15      |  ~ (cup_closed(v2) = v1) |  ~ (cup_closed(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.78/2.15      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 9.78/2.15      ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 9.78/2.15    [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v0))
% 9.78/2.15  
% 9.78/2.15  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 9.78/2.15  --------------------------------------------
% 9.78/2.15  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, cc1_finset_1, cc1_finsub_1, cc2_finset_1, cc2_finsub_1,
% 9.78/2.15  cc3_finsub_1, dt_k5_finsub_1, existence_m1_subset_1, fc1_finset_1, fc1_finsub_1,
% 9.78/2.15  fc1_subset_1, fc1_xboole_0, fc2_finsub_1, fc2_subset_1, rc1_finset_1,
% 9.78/2.15  rc1_finsub_1, rc1_subset_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, rc3_finset_1,
% 9.78/2.15  rc4_finset_1, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t1_subset, t2_subset, t3_subset, t4_subset,
% 9.78/2.15  t5_subset, t7_boole
% 9.78/2.15  
% 9.78/2.15  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 9.78/2.15  ---------------------------------
% 9.78/2.15  
% 9.78/2.15  Begin of proof
% 9.78/2.15  | 
% 9.78/2.15  | ALPHA: (t6_boole) implies:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] : (v0 = empty_set |  ~ (empty(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | ALPHA: (t1_zfmisc_1) implies:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (2)   ? [v0: $i] : (singleton(empty_set) = v0 & powerset(empty_set) = v0 &
% 9.78/2.16  |          $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | ALPHA: (t28_finsub_1) implies:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (3)  $i(empty_set)
% 9.78/2.16  |   (4)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & singleton(empty_set) = v1 &
% 9.78/2.16  |          finite_subsets(empty_set) = v0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) =
% 9.78/2.16  |            v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v0))
% 9.78/2.16  |   (6)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 9.78/2.16  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (finite(v2) = v1) |  ~ (finite(v2) = v0))
% 9.78/2.16  |   (7)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2)
% 9.78/2.16  |            = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0))
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbol all_32_0 gives:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (8)  singleton(empty_set) = all_32_0 & powerset(empty_set) = all_32_0 &
% 9.78/2.16  |        $i(all_32_0)
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | ALPHA: (8) implies:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (9)  powerset(empty_set) = all_32_0
% 9.78/2.16  |   (10)  singleton(empty_set) = all_32_0
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | DELTA: instantiating (4) with fresh symbols all_41_0, all_41_1 gives:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (11)   ~ (all_41_0 = all_41_1) & singleton(empty_set) = all_41_0 &
% 9.78/2.16  |         finite_subsets(empty_set) = all_41_1 & $i(all_41_0) & $i(all_41_1)
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | ALPHA: (11) implies:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (12)   ~ (all_41_0 = all_41_1)
% 9.78/2.16  |   (13)  finite_subsets(empty_set) = all_41_1
% 9.78/2.16  |   (14)  singleton(empty_set) = all_41_0
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_32_0, all_41_0, empty_set, simplifying
% 9.78/2.16  |              with (10), (14) gives:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (15)  all_41_0 = all_32_0
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | REDUCE: (12), (15) imply:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (16)   ~ (all_41_1 = all_32_0)
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.16  | SIMP: (16) implies:
% 9.78/2.16  |   (17)   ~ (all_41_1 = all_32_0)
% 9.78/2.16  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (rc2_finset_1) with empty_set, all_32_0,
% 9.78/2.17  |              simplifying with (3), (9) gives:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (18)   ? [v0: $i] : (relation(v0) = 0 & function(v0) = 0 & one_to_one(v0) =
% 9.78/2.17  |           0 & epsilon_transitive(v0) = 0 & epsilon_connected(v0) = 0 &
% 9.78/2.17  |           ordinal(v0) = 0 & natural(v0) = 0 & finite(v0) = 0 & empty(v0) = 0 &
% 9.78/2.17  |           element(v0, all_32_0) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (rc2_subset_1) with empty_set, all_32_0,
% 9.78/2.17  |              simplifying with (3), (9) gives:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (19)   ? [v0: $i] : (empty(v0) = 0 & element(v0, all_32_0) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t27_finsub_1) with empty_set, all_41_1,
% 9.78/2.17  |              simplifying with (3), (13) gives:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (20)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: $i] : (finite(empty_set) = v0 &
% 9.78/2.17  |           powerset(empty_set) = v1 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = all_41_1))
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbol all_59_0 gives:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (21)  empty(all_59_0) = 0 & element(all_59_0, all_32_0) = 0 & $i(all_59_0)
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | ALPHA: (21) implies:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (22)  $i(all_59_0)
% 9.78/2.17  |   (23)  empty(all_59_0) = 0
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_64_0, all_64_1 gives:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (24)  finite(empty_set) = all_64_1 & powerset(empty_set) = all_64_0 &
% 9.78/2.17  |         $i(all_64_0) & ( ~ (all_64_1 = 0) | all_64_0 = all_41_1)
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | ALPHA: (24) implies:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (25)  powerset(empty_set) = all_64_0
% 9.78/2.17  |   (26)  finite(empty_set) = all_64_1
% 9.78/2.17  |   (27)   ~ (all_64_1 = 0) | all_64_0 = all_41_1
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | DELTA: instantiating (18) with fresh symbol all_66_0 gives:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (28)  relation(all_66_0) = 0 & function(all_66_0) = 0 & one_to_one(all_66_0)
% 9.78/2.17  |         = 0 & epsilon_transitive(all_66_0) = 0 & epsilon_connected(all_66_0) =
% 9.78/2.17  |         0 & ordinal(all_66_0) = 0 & natural(all_66_0) = 0 & finite(all_66_0) =
% 9.78/2.17  |         0 & empty(all_66_0) = 0 & element(all_66_0, all_32_0) = 0 &
% 9.78/2.17  |         $i(all_66_0)
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | ALPHA: (28) implies:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (29)  $i(all_66_0)
% 9.78/2.17  |   (30)  empty(all_66_0) = 0
% 9.78/2.17  |   (31)  finite(all_66_0) = 0
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_32_0, all_64_0, empty_set, simplifying
% 9.78/2.17  |              with (9), (25) gives:
% 9.78/2.17  |   (32)  all_64_0 = all_32_0
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | BETA: splitting (27) gives:
% 9.78/2.17  | 
% 9.78/2.17  | Case 1:
% 9.78/2.17  | | 
% 9.78/2.17  | |   (33)   ~ (all_64_1 = 0)
% 9.78/2.17  | | 
% 9.78/2.17  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t8_boole) with all_59_0, all_66_0, simplifying
% 9.78/2.17  | |              with (22), (23), (29), (30) gives:
% 9.78/2.17  | |   (34)  all_66_0 = all_59_0
% 9.78/2.17  | | 
% 9.78/2.17  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_66_0, simplifying with (29), (30)
% 9.78/2.17  | |              gives:
% 9.78/2.17  | |   (35)  all_66_0 = empty_set
% 9.78/2.17  | | 
% 9.78/2.17  | | COMBINE_EQS: (34), (35) imply:
% 9.78/2.17  | |   (36)  all_59_0 = empty_set
% 9.78/2.17  | | 
% 9.78/2.17  | | REDUCE: (31), (35) imply:
% 9.78/2.17  | |   (37)  finite(empty_set) = 0
% 9.78/2.17  | | 
% 9.78/2.17  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_64_1, 0, empty_set, simplifying with
% 9.78/2.17  | |              (26), (37) gives:
% 9.78/2.18  | |   (38)  all_64_1 = 0
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | | REDUCE: (33), (38) imply:
% 9.78/2.18  | |   (39)  $false
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | | CLOSE: (39) is inconsistent.
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | Case 2:
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | |   (40)  all_64_0 = all_41_1
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | | COMBINE_EQS: (32), (40) imply:
% 9.78/2.18  | |   (41)  all_41_1 = all_32_0
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | | SIMP: (41) implies:
% 9.78/2.18  | |   (42)  all_41_1 = all_32_0
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | | REDUCE: (17), (42) imply:
% 9.78/2.18  | |   (43)  $false
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | | CLOSE: (43) is inconsistent.
% 9.78/2.18  | | 
% 9.78/2.18  | End of split
% 9.78/2.18  | 
% 9.78/2.18  End of proof
% 9.78/2.18  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.78/2.18  
% 9.78/2.18  1591ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------