↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SEU116+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:40:34 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.41s 0.63s
% Output   : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   8   ~;   3   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   1 sgn  10   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t30_finsub_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( element(B,finite_subsets(A))
     => finite(B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_finsub_1) ).

fof(c18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( element(B,finite_subsets(A))
       => finite(B) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t30_finsub_1]) ).

fof(c19,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( element(B,finite_subsets(A))
      & ~ finite(B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c18]) ).

fof(c20,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X2,X3] :
      ( element(X3,finite_subsets(X2))
      & ~ finite(X3) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c19]) ).

fof(c21,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(skolem0002,finite_subsets(skolem0001))
    & ~ finite(skolem0002) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c20]) ).

cnf(c23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(skolem0002),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c21]) ).

cnf(c22,negated_conjecture,
    element(skolem0002,finite_subsets(skolem0001)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c21]) ).

fof(cc3_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( element(B,finite_subsets(A))
     => finite(B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc3_finsub_1) ).

fof(c83,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ element(B,finite_subsets(A))
      | finite(B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc3_finsub_1]) ).

fof(c84,plain,
    ! [X18,X19] :
      ( ~ element(X19,finite_subsets(X18))
      | finite(X19) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c83]) ).

cnf(c85,plain,
    ( ~ element(X188,finite_subsets(X187))
    | finite(X188) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c84]) ).

cnf(c355,plain,
    finite(skolem0002),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c85,c22]) ).

cnf(c357,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c355,c23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SEU116+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Wed May  8 11:20:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.41/0.63  % Version:  1.5
% 0.41/0.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.63  
% 0.41/0.63  % Initial clauses    : 81
% 0.41/0.63  % Processed clauses  : 110
% 0.41/0.63  % Factors computed   : 2
% 0.41/0.63  % Resolvents computed: 196
% 0.41/0.63  % Tautologies deleted: 15
% 0.41/0.63  % Forward subsumed   : 20
% 0.41/0.63  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.41/0.63  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.41/0.63  % User time          : 0.255 s
% 0.41/0.63  % System time        : 0.014 s
% 0.41/0.63  % Total time         : 0.270 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------