↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU119+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  122 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  60   ~;  56   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   2 sgn  34   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t3_xboole_0,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ! [X3] :
              ~ ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X2) ) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X1)
              & in(X3,X2) )
          & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(d7_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ( X31 != empty_set
        | ~ in(X32,X31) )
      & ( in(esk1_1(X33),X33)
        | X33 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
            & ! [X3] :
                ~ ( in(X3,X1)
                  & in(X3,X2) ) )
        & ~ ( ? [X3] :
                ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X2) )
            & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t3_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42] :
      ( ( in(X38,X35)
        | ~ in(X38,X37)
        | X37 != set_intersection2(X35,X36) )
      & ( in(X38,X36)
        | ~ in(X38,X37)
        | X37 != set_intersection2(X35,X36) )
      & ( ~ in(X39,X35)
        | ~ in(X39,X36)
        | in(X39,X37)
        | X37 != set_intersection2(X35,X36) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_3(X40,X41,X42),X42)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X40,X41,X42),X40)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X40,X41,X42),X41)
        | X42 = set_intersection2(X40,X41) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X40,X41,X42),X40)
        | in(esk2_3(X40,X41,X42),X42)
        | X42 = set_intersection2(X40,X41) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X40,X41,X42),X41)
        | in(esk2_3(X40,X41,X42),X42)
        | X42 = set_intersection2(X40,X41) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X53] :
      ( ( in(esk7_0,esk5_0)
        | ~ disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0) )
      & ( in(esk7_0,esk6_0)
        | ~ disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0) )
      & ( disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)
        | ~ disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0) )
      & ( in(esk7_0,esk5_0)
        | ~ in(X53,esk5_0)
        | ~ in(X53,esk6_0) )
      & ( in(esk7_0,esk6_0)
        | ~ in(X53,esk5_0)
        | ~ in(X53,esk6_0) )
      & ( disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)
        | ~ in(X53,esk5_0)
        | ~ in(X53,esk6_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X44,X45] :
      ( ( ~ disjoint(X44,X45)
        | set_intersection2(X44,X45) = empty_set )
      & ( set_intersection2(X44,X45) != empty_set
        | disjoint(X44,X45) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d7_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk7_0,esk5_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | in(esk2_3(X1,X2,empty_set),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X29,X30] : set_intersection2(X29,X30) = set_intersection2(X30,X29),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk7_0,esk5_0)
    | ~ disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | set_intersection2(X1,X2) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,esk5_0) = empty_set
    | in(esk7_0,esk5_0)
    | ~ in(esk2_3(X1,esk5_0,empty_set),esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),X1)
    | in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk7_0,esk5_0)
    | set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk6_0) != empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk7_0,esk5_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_11]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_intersection2(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ in(esk7_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = empty_set
    | ~ in(esk7_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk7_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk6_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk5_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_11]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk7_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,esk6_0) = empty_set
    | ~ in(esk2_3(X1,esk6_0,empty_set),esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk7_0,esk6_0)
    | set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk6_0) != empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = empty_set,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_20]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk7_0,esk6_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_36]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU119+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:44:13 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------