%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SEU119+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:23:54 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.38s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SEU119+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.10/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 12:04:15 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.12/0.37 # % 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 22 Number of unprocessed: 22 % 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.37 # 22 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 5 conjectures. % 0.12/0.37 # There are 5 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.37 # Found 6 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.12/0.37 # 5 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.37 # 16 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.37 # 6 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.37 % 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 5 % 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 16 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.37 # We now have 16 tableaux to operate on % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (empty(esk3_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,X1)=X1)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,X2)=set_intersection2(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~empty(esk4_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (~in(X1,empty_set))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk5_0)|~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk6_0)|~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk5_0)|~in(X1,esk5_0)|~in(X1,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,X2)=empty_set|~disjoint(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=empty_set|in(esk1_1(X1),X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk6_0)|~in(X1,esk5_0)|~in(X1,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)|~in(X1,esk5_0)|~in(X1,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (disjoint(X1,X2)|~disjoint(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (disjoint(X1,X2)|set_intersection2(X1,X2)!=empty_set)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~in(X1,set_intersection2(X3,X2)))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))|~in(X1,X3)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=set_intersection2(X2,X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=set_intersection2(X2,X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X2)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=set_intersection2(X2,X3)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X2))). % 0.12/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.38 # Found 5 steps % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk6_0)|~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (in(esk7_0,esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_124, plain, (~in(esk6_0,esk7_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_40, ...])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_134, plain, (~in(esk6_0,set_intersection2(X6,esk7_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_134, ...])). % 0.12/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (empty(empty_set))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (empty(esk3_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,X1)=X1)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,X2)=set_intersection2(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~empty(esk4_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (~in(X1,empty_set))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk5_0)|~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk6_0)|~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk5_0)|~in(X1,esk5_0)|~in(X1,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,X2)=empty_set|~disjoint(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=empty_set|in(esk1_1(X1),X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk6_0)|~in(X1,esk5_0)|~in(X1,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)|~in(X1,esk5_0)|~in(X1,esk6_0))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (disjoint(X1,X2)|~disjoint(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (disjoint(X1,X2)|set_intersection2(X1,X2)!=empty_set)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~in(X1,set_intersection2(X3,X2)))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))|~in(X1,X3)|~in(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=set_intersection2(X2,X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=set_intersection2(X2,X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X2)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=set_intersection2(X2,X3)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X2))). % 0.12/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.38 # Found 5 steps % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (in(esk7_0,esk5_0)|~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (in(esk7_0,esk5_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_124, plain, (~in(esk5_0,esk7_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_42, ...])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_134, plain, (~in(esk5_0,set_intersection2(X6,esk7_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_134, ...])). % 0.12/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.38 # Child (30507) has found a proof. % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 # Proof search is over... % 0.12/0.38 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------