↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : SEU120+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 08:52:48 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.98s 2.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  20 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  22   ~;  11   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (  26   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > disjoint > empty > set_intersection2 > #nlpp > empty_set > #skF_1 > #skF_7 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_8 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff(set_intersection2,type,
    set_intersection2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(disjoint,type,
    disjoint: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(f_39,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( A = empty_set )
    <=> ! [B] : ~ in(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_43,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( disjoint(A,B)
    <=> ( set_intersection2(A,B) = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_71,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(A,B)
            & ! [C] : ~ in(C,set_intersection2(A,B)) )
        & ~ ( ? [C] : in(C,set_intersection2(A,B))
            & disjoint(A,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [B_8] : ~ in(B_8,empty_set),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [B_4,A_3] : ( set_intersection2(B_4,A_3) = set_intersection2(A_3,B_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    ! [A_30,B_31] :
      ( disjoint(A_30,B_31)
      | ( set_intersection2(A_30,B_31) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ( disjoint('#skF_4','#skF_5')
    | ~ disjoint('#skF_7','#skF_8') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    ~ disjoint('#skF_7','#skF_8'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_32]) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    set_intersection2('#skF_7','#skF_8') != empty_set,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_59]) ).

tff(c_107,plain,
    set_intersection2('#skF_8','#skF_7') != empty_set,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_102]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [A_5] :
      ( ( empty_set = A_5 )
      | in('#skF_1'(A_5),A_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [C_17] :
      ( disjoint('#skF_4','#skF_5')
      | ~ in(C_17,set_intersection2('#skF_7','#skF_8')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_35,plain,
    ! [C_17] :
      ( disjoint('#skF_4','#skF_5')
      | ~ in(C_17,set_intersection2('#skF_8','#skF_7')) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_28]) ).

tff(c_123,plain,
    ! [C_34] : ~ in(C_34,set_intersection2('#skF_8','#skF_7')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_35]) ).

tff(c_127,plain,
    set_intersection2('#skF_8','#skF_7') = empty_set,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_123]) ).

tff(c_131,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_127]) ).

tff(c_132,plain,
    disjoint('#skF_4','#skF_5'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_35]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [A_9,B_10] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(A_9,B_10) = empty_set )
      | ~ disjoint(A_9,B_10) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).

tff(c_138,plain,
    set_intersection2('#skF_4','#skF_5') = empty_set,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_10]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ! [C_17] :
      ( in('#skF_6',set_intersection2('#skF_4','#skF_5'))
      | ~ in(C_17,set_intersection2('#skF_7','#skF_8')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [C_17] :
      ( in('#skF_6',set_intersection2('#skF_4','#skF_5'))
      | ~ in(C_17,set_intersection2('#skF_8','#skF_7')) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_30]) ).

tff(c_172,plain,
    ! [C_17] :
      ( in('#skF_6',empty_set)
      | ~ in(C_17,set_intersection2('#skF_8','#skF_7')) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_138,c_36]) ).

tff(c_174,plain,
    ! [C_35] : ~ in(C_35,set_intersection2('#skF_8','#skF_7')),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_172]) ).

tff(c_178,plain,
    set_intersection2('#skF_8','#skF_7') = empty_set,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_174]) ).

tff(c_182,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_178]) ).

tff(c_183,plain,
    disjoint('#skF_4','#skF_5'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_32]) ).

tff(c_238,plain,
    ! [A_39,B_40] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(A_39,B_40) = empty_set )
      | ~ disjoint(A_39,B_40) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).

tff(c_254,plain,
    set_intersection2('#skF_4','#skF_5') = empty_set,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_183,c_238]) ).

tff(c_184,plain,
    disjoint('#skF_7','#skF_8'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_32]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ( in('#skF_6',set_intersection2('#skF_4','#skF_5'))
    | ~ disjoint('#skF_7','#skF_8') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_196,plain,
    in('#skF_6',set_intersection2('#skF_4','#skF_5')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_184,c_34]) ).

tff(c_280,plain,
    in('#skF_6',empty_set),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_254,c_196]) ).

tff(c_282,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_280]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SEU120+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Apr  8 22:04:37 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.98/2.54  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.98/2.55  
% 3.98/2.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------