%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEU121+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:38 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.01s 1.93s
% Output : Refutation 3.01s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 103 ( 17 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 284 ( 31 ~; 0 |; 36 &; 188 @)
% ( 5 <=>; 24 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 82 ( 0 ^; 74 !; 8 ?; 82 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(subset_decl,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(empty_set_decl,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(set_intersection2_decl,type,
set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(disjoint_decl,type,
disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( A != B )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( A != B )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ disjoint ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ disjoint ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A = empty_set )
<=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).
thf(65,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) )
=> ( A = empty_set ) )
& ( ( A = empty_set )
=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
empty_set @ empty,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(34,plain,
empty_set @ empty,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).
thf(54,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) )
<=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
<=> ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).
thf(81,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) )
=> ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) ) )
& ( ( C
= ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) )
=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).
thf(108,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(63,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(31,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(43,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ subset ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_xboole_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ subset ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(20,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ subset ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
<=> ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= empty_set )
=> ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= empty_set ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
& ? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( C @ in ) ) )
& ~ ( ! [C: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( C @ in ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0) ).
thf(57,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
& ? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( C @ in ) ) )
& ~ ( ! [C: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) @ ( C @ in ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(29,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
thf(116,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
& ? [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) ) )
& ~ ( ! [C: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_0) ).
thf(74,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
& ? [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) ) )
& ~ ( ! [C: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ in ) ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(124,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,38,65,34,54,81,108,35,63,31,43,40,20,46,57,29,116,74]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : SEU121+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.05/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.31 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.31 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:37:20 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.05/0.32 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.79/0.80 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.96/0.97 % [INFO] Parsing done (164ms).
% 0.96/0.98 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.69/1.32 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.69/1.33 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.89/1.41 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 19 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.89/1.46 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 17 axioms (removed 2 axioms).
% 1.89/1.50 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.09/1.50 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.09/1.51 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.01/1.93 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.01/1.93 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.01/1.93 % Time passed: 1485ms (effective reasoning time: 943ms)
% 3.01/1.93 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.01/1.93 % Axioms used in derivation (17): idempotence_k3_xboole_0, fc1_xboole_0, commutativity_k3_xboole_0, d1_xboole_0, t6_boole, t4_xboole_0, t7_boole, d7_xboole_0, symmetry_r1_xboole_0, t3_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, d3_tarski, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t8_boole, rc1_xboole_0, d3_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 3.01/1.93 % No. of inferences in proof: 38
% 3.01/1.93 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1485 ms resp. 943 ms w/o parsing
% 3.01/1.96 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.01/1.96 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------