↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU122+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.59s 2.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   5 unt;   2 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   2 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rm8wx9ih/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rm8wx9ih/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(empty_set,esk6_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rm8wx9ih/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(empty_set,esk6_0),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SEU122+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 11:53:16 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.59/2.25  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.59/2.25  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.59/2.25  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.59/2.25  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 4.59/2.25  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 4.59/2.25  #
% 4.59/2.25  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 4.59/2.25  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.59/2.25  
% 4.59/2.25  # Proof found!
% 4.59/2.25  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.59/2.25  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.59/2.25  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.59/2.25  
% 4.59/2.25  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.59/2.25  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 4.59/2.25  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 4.59/2.25  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 4.59/2.25  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.59/2.25  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------