↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU122+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SEU122+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 11:57:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS derived 9 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 34 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS allocated 97998 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 7 :
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> empty(empty_set)*.
% 0.18/0.44  5[0:Inp] || subset(empty_set,skc3)*r -> .
% 0.18/0.44  11[0:Inp] empty(u) || in(v,u)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  14[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(u,v) in(skf6(v,u),u)*.
% 0.18/0.44  33[0:Res:14.1,5.0] ||  -> in(skf6(skc3,empty_set),empty_set)*.
% 0.18/0.44  40[0:Res:33.0,11.1] empty(empty_set) ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.44  42[0:SSi:40.0,1.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : fc1_xboole_0 t2_xboole_1 t7_boole d3_tarski
% 0.18/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------