↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU123+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 27)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

fof(t3_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( subset(X1,empty_set)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_1) ).

fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ? [X1] : ~ empty(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(t7_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( in(X1,X2)
        & empty(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).

fof(t8_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( empty(X1)
        & X1 != X2
        & empty(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t2_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : subset(empty_set,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_xboole_1) ).

fof(t6_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).

fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ? [X1] : empty(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
    empty(empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).

fof(i_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_r2_hidden]) ).

fof(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( subset(X1,empty_set)
       => X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t3_xboole_1]) ).

fof(i_0_13,plain,
    ? [X1] : ~ empty(X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rc2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(i_0_14,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] :
      ( ( subset(X20,X21)
        | X20 != X21 )
      & ( subset(X21,X20)
        | X20 != X21 )
      & ( ~ subset(X20,X21)
        | ~ subset(X21,X20)
        | X20 = X21 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])]) ).

fof(i_0_15,plain,
    ! [X18,X19] :
      ( ~ in(X18,X19)
      | ~ in(X19,X18) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_11])]) ).

fof(i_0_16,plain,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( ~ in(X28,X29)
      | ~ empty(X29) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_boole])]) ).

fof(i_0_17,plain,
    ! [X30,X31] :
      ( ~ empty(X30)
      | X30 = X31
      | ~ empty(X31) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t8_boole])]) ).

fof(i_0_18,plain,
    ! [X24] : subset(X24,X24),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

fof(i_0_19,plain,
    ! [X25] : subset(empty_set,X25),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_xboole_1]) ).

fof(i_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk3_0,empty_set)
    & esk3_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_12])])]) ).

fof(i_0_21,plain,
    ! [X27] :
      ( ~ empty(X27)
      | X27 = empty_set ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_boole])]) ).

fof(i_0_22,plain,
    ~ empty(esk2_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[i_0_13])]) ).

fof(i_0_23,plain,
    empty(esk1_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc1_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ empty(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_16]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | X2 != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ empty(X1)
    | ~ empty(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_17]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_18]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_19]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk3_0,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_20]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ empty(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    ~ empty(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_22]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    empty(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_23]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    empty(empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fc1_xboole_0]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_20]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_38,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_39,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_40,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_41,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_42,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_43,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_44,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X3,X1)
    | in(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_45,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ empty(X1)
    | empty(X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_38_001,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_39_002,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_40_003,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_41_004,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_42_005,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_43_006,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_44_007,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X3,X1)
    | in(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_45_008,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ empty(X1)
    | empty(X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_46,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_inference,[],[27]) ).

cnf(i_0_47,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_inference,[],[28]) ).

cnf(i_0_48,plain,
    $false,
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_37,i_0_32,i_0_31,i_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SEU123+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:43:47 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.25/1.61  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.25/1.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.62  % Total time : 1.270s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------