↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU124+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  19   ~;  16   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2 sgn  24   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_union2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            | in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] : subset(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    ( ~ in(D,A)
    | in(D,C)
    | set_union2(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(nnf_4,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [C] :
            ( ~ in(C,B)
            & in(C,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(X0,B)
            | ~ in(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski]) ).

fof(sk_d3_tarski_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ in(sK0(A,B),B)
          & in(sK0(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(X0,B)
            | ~ in(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(C,sK0(A,B))],[nnf_4]) ).

fof(sk_d3_tarski,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( in(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski_sk]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    ( in(sK0(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0(A,B),B)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

fof(nnf_17,plain,
    ? [A,B] : ~ subset(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t7_xboole_1_neg,plain,
    ~ subset(sK1,set_union2(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK2)],[nnf_17]) ).

cnf(c_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK1,set_union2(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t7_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | in(A,set_union2(B,C)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_21]) ).

cnf(c_162,plain,
    in(sK0(sK1,set_union2(sK1,sK2)),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_163,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0(sK1,set_union2(sK1,sK2)),set_union2(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_323,plain,
    ~ in(sK0(sK1,set_union2(sK1,sK2)),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_163]) ).

cnf(c_322,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_162,c_323]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SEU124+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:38:33 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.16/0.44  % Process 1106586 was started by sandbox on n020,
% 0.16/0.44  % Sat Sep 26 08:38:33 2026
% 0.16/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.16/0.45  
% 0.16/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  % Proof 1 at 0.06 (+ 0.03) seconds.
% 0.22/0.55  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.22/0.55  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.22/0.55  % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 0.22/0.55  % Given clauses 47.
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------