↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU125+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:51:59 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  11 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   61 (  24   ~;  22   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  32   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = set_union2(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ( in(X3,X0)
            | in(X3,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f18,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        & subset(X2,X1) )
     => subset(set_union2(X0,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_xboole_1) ).

fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( subset(X0,X1)
          & subset(X2,X1) )
       => subset(set_union2(X0,X2),X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f18]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          | ~ in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ subset(set_union2(X0,X2),X1)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ subset(set_union2(X0,X2),X1)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( in(X3,X1)
      | in(X3,X0)
      | ~ in(X3,X2)
      | set_union2(X0,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | in(X2,X1)
      | ~ in(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    subset(sK6,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    subset(sK4,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ~ subset(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X3,set_union2(X0,X1))
      | in(X3,X0)
      | in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),set_union2(sK4,sK6)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f40,f55]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ~ in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK5),
    inference(resolution,[],[f41,f55]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ in(X0,sK6)
      | in(X0,sK5) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f39,f53]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ in(X0,sK4)
      | in(X0,sK5) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f39,f54]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ( in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK4)
    | in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK6) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f58,f89]) ).

fof(f129,definition,
    ( spl7_1
  <=> in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK6) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl7_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK6)
    | ~ spl7_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f129]) ).

fof(f133,definition,
    ( spl7_2
  <=> in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK4) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl7_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ( in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK4)
    | ~ spl7_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f133]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( spl7_1
    | spl7_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f119,f133,f129]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ( in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK5)
    | ~ spl7_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f135,f115]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f141,f92]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ~ spl7_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f144]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ( in(sK1(set_union2(sK4,sK6),sK5),sK5)
    | ~ spl7_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f131,f114]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f150,f92]) ).

fof(f154,plain,
    ~ spl7_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f153]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl7_1
    | spl7_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f136]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ~ spl7_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f145]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ~ spl7_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f154]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s2,s3]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU125+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:40:27 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.39  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160887)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=380794178:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1160887-1160901"...
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)...printing done.
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160898)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160901)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.18/0.47  % (1160887)Success in time 0.036 s
% 0.18/0.47  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------