%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU125+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.78s 2.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 10 unt; 6 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 41 ( 2 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| in(X1,X3)
| X4 != set_union2(X3,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rk1bsa57/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_51,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(set_union2(esk9_0,esk11_0),esk10_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rk1bsa57/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).
cnf(i_0_16,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rk1bsa57/lgb.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_17,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rk1bsa57/lgb.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(i_0_52,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk11_0,esk10_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rk1bsa57/lgb.p',i_0_52) ).
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rk1bsa57/lgb.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk9_0,esk10_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rk1bsa57/lgb.p',i_0_53) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| in(X1,X3)
| X4 != set_union2(X3,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X4) ),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(set_union2(esk9_0,esk11_0),esk10_0),
i_0_51 ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk11_0,esk10_0),
i_0_52 ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| in(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
in(esk3_2(set_union2(esk9_0,esk11_0),esk10_0),set_union2(esk9_0,esk11_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk9_0,esk10_0),
i_0_53 ).
cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk10_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk11_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( in(esk3_2(set_union2(esk9_0,esk11_0),esk10_0),esk9_0)
| in(esk3_2(set_union2(esk9_0,esk11_0),esk10_0),esk11_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk3_2(set_union2(esk9_0,esk11_0),esk10_0),esk10_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_68]) ).
cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk10_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk9_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
in(esk3_2(set_union2(esk9_0,esk11_0),esk10_0),esk9_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),c_0_72]) ).
cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),c_0_72]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14 % Problem : SEU125+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 00:22:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.78/2.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.78/2.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.78/2.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.78/2.39 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 7.78/2.39 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.78/2.39 #
% 7.78/2.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 7.78/2.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.78/2.39
% 7.78/2.39 # Proof found!
% 7.78/2.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.78/2.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.78/2.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.78/2.39
% 7.78/2.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.78/2.39 # User time : 0.018 s
% 7.78/2.39 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.78/2.39 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 7.78/2.39 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.78/2.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------