↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU126+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  15   ~;  11   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   2 sgn  25   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t12_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_xboole_1) ).

fof(t8_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X3,X2) )
     => subset(set_union2(X1,X3),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_xboole_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( subset(X1,X2)
       => set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t12_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,lemma,
    ! [X144,X145,X146] :
      ( ~ subset(X144,X145)
      | ~ subset(X146,X145)
      | subset(set_union2(X144,X146),X145) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t8_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk7_0,esk8_0)
    & set_union2(esk7_0,esk8_0) != esk8_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,lemma,
    ( subset(set_union2(X1,X3),X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk7_0,esk8_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X114] : subset(X114,X114),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X70,X71] : set_union2(X70,X71) = set_union2(X71,X70),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X74,X75] :
      ( ( subset(X74,X75)
        | X74 != X75 )
      & ( subset(X75,X74)
        | X74 != X75 )
      & ( ~ subset(X74,X75)
        | ~ subset(X75,X74)
        | X74 = X75 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(set_union2(X1,esk7_0),esk8_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk8_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_16,lemma,
    ! [X140,X141] : subset(X140,set_union2(X140,X141)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk7_0,esk8_0) != esk8_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    subset(set_union2(esk8_0,esk7_0),esk8_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk8_0,esk7_0) != esk8_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),c_0_22]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SEU126+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:44:21 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------