↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEU126+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:40:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 16.82s 2.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 16.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU126+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:43:42 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.34  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 16.82/2.98  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 16.82/2.98  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 16.82/2.98  fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : 'set$uunion2'(X0,X1) = 'set$uunion2'(X1,X0)).
% 16.82/2.98  fof(d2_xboole_0, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ((X2 = 'set$uunion2'(X0,X1) <=> ! [X3] : ((in(X3,X2) <=> (in(X3,X0) | in(X3,X1))))))).
% 16.82/2.98  fof(d3_tarski, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((subset(X0,X1) <=> ! [X2] : ((in(X2,X0) => in(X2,X1)))))).
% 16.82/2.98  fof(t12_xboole_1, conjecture, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((subset(X0,X1) => 'set$uunion2'(X0,X1) = X1))).
% 16.82/2.98  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((subset(X0,X1) => 'set$uunion2'(X0,X1) = X1)), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [t12_xboole_1])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(c1, plain, 'set$uunion2'(X0,X1) = 'set$uunion2'(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [commutativity_k2_xboole_0])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(c9, plain, X0 = 'set$uunion2'(X1,X2) | ~X3(X1,X2,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d2_xboole_0])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(c14, plain, X0(X1,X2,X3) | in(sK16(X1,X2,X3),X3) | in(sK16(X1,X2,X3),X1) | in(sK16(X1,X2,X3),X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d2_xboole_0])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(c17, plain, X0(X1,X2,X3) | ~in(sK16(X1,X2,X3),X2) | ~in(sK16(X1,X2,X3),X3), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d2_xboole_0])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(c19, plain, ~subset(X0,X1) | ~in(X2,X0) | in(X2,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d3_tarski])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(c58, plain, subset(sK67,sK68), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(c59, plain, 'set$uunion2'(sK67,sK68) != sK68, inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d0, plain, in(X0,sK68) | ~in(X0,sK67), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c19,c58])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d1, plain, in(sK16(sK67,X0,X1),sK68) | in(sK16(sK67,X0,X1),X1) | in(sK16(sK67,X0,X1),X0) | 'Ts11'(sK67,X0,X1), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d0,c14])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d2, plain, in(sK16(sK67,X0,X0),X0) | in(sK16(sK67,X0,X0),sK68) | 'Ts11'(sK67,X0,X0), inference(factoring, [status(thm)], [d1])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d3, plain, in(sK16(sK67,sK68,sK68),sK68) | 'Ts11'(sK67,sK68,sK68), inference(factoring, [status(thm)], [d2])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d4, plain, 'Ts11'(sK67,sK68,sK68) | ~in(sK16(sK67,sK68,sK68),sK68) | 'Ts11'(sK67,sK68,sK68), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d3,c17])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d5, plain, 'Ts11'(sK67,sK68,sK68) | 'Ts11'(sK67,sK68,sK68), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,d3])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d6, plain, sK68 = 'set$uunion2'(sK67,sK68), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d5,c9])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d7, plain, sK68 = 'set$uunion2'(sK68,sK67), inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [d6,c1])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d8, plain, 'set$uunion2'(sK68,sK67) != sK68, inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [c59,c1])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d9, plain, sK68 != sK68, inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [d8,d7])).
% 16.82/2.98  cnf(d10, plain, $false, inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [d9])).
% 16.82/2.98  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------