↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU126+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.63s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   91 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  104 (  35   ~;  46   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0 sgn  40   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_union2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            | in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t12_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
     => set_union2(A,B) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t12_xboole_1) ).

fof(t12_xboole_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( subset(A,B)
       => set_union2(A,B) = B ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t12_xboole_1]) ).

fof(nnf_6,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ? [D] :
            ( ( ( ~ in(D,B)
                & ~ in(D,A) )
              | ~ in(D,C) )
            & ( in(D,B)
              | in(D,A)
              | in(D,C) ) )
        | set_union2(A,B) = C )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( ( ( ~ in(X0,B)
                & ~ in(X0,A) )
              | in(X0,C) )
            & ( in(X0,B)
              | in(X0,A)
              | ~ in(X0,C) ) )
        | set_union2(A,B) != C ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(sk_d2_xboole_0_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ( ( ( ~ in(sK0(A,B,C),B)
              & ~ in(sK0(A,B,C),A) )
            | ~ in(sK0(A,B,C),C) )
          & ( in(sK0(A,B,C),B)
            | in(sK0(A,B,C),A)
            | in(sK0(A,B,C),C) ) )
        | set_union2(A,B) = C )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( ( ( ~ in(X0,B)
                & ~ in(X0,A) )
              | in(X0,C) )
            & ( in(X0,B)
              | in(X0,A)
              | ~ in(X0,C) ) )
        | set_union2(A,B) != C ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(D,sK0(A,B,C))],[nnf_6]) ).

fof(sk_d2_xboole_0,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_1)
        | ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | set_union2(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_0)
        | ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | set_union2(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_1)
        | in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_0)
        | in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | set_union2(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( ~ in(VAR_3,VAR_1)
        | in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | set_union2(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( ~ in(VAR_3,VAR_0)
        | in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | set_union2(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( in(VAR_3,VAR_1)
        | in(VAR_3,VAR_0)
        | ~ in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | set_union2(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d2_xboole_0_sk]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( in(sK0(A,B,C),B)
    | in(sK0(A,B,C),A)
    | in(sK0(A,B,C),C)
    | set_union2(A,B) = C ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0(A,B,C),B)
    | ~ in(sK0(A,B,C),C)
    | set_union2(A,B) = C ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    ( in(C,B)
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski]) ).

fof(nnf_32,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( set_union2(A,B) != B
      & subset(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_xboole_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t12_xboole_1_neg,plain,
    ( set_union2(sK1,sK2) != sK2
    & subset(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK2)],[nnf_32]) ).

cnf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t12_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(sK1,sK2) != sK2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t12_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0(A,B,B),B)
    | set_union2(A,B) = B ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_46]) ).

cnf(c_858,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(A,sK2)
    | ~ in(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_47,c_81]) ).

cnf(c_687,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK0(sK1,A,B),A)
    | in(sK0(sK1,A,B),B)
    | set_union2(sK1,A) = B
    | in(sK0(sK1,A,B),sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_858,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_698,plain,
    ( in(sK0(sK1,A,sK2),A)
    | set_union2(sK1,A) = sK2
    | in(sK0(sK1,A,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_687]) ).

cnf(c_859,plain,
    ( set_union2(sK1,sK2) = sK2
    | in(sK0(sK1,sK2,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_698]) ).

cnf(c_705,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK0(sK1,sK2,sK2),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_859]) ).

cnf(c_860,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0(sK1,sK2,sK2),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_82]) ).

cnf(c_857,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_705,c_860]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU126+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:37:46 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.37  % Process 1713548 was started by sandbox on n005,
% 0.11/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:37:46 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.63/0.50  
% 0.63/0.50  % Assigning unary symbol f1 kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (18).
% 0.63/0.50  
% 0.63/0.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.63/0.50  
% 0.63/0.50  % Proof 1 at 0.07 (+ 0.03) seconds.
% 0.63/0.50  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.63/0.50  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.63/0.50  % Maximum clause weight is 33.000.
% 0.63/0.50  % Given clauses 57.
% 0.63/0.50  
% 0.63/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------