↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU128+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:42 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  35   ~;  40   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   5 sgn  29   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t19_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X1,X3) )
     => subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_xboole_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(idempotence_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & subset(X1,X3) )
       => subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t19_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X35,X36,X37,X38,X39] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X35,X36)
        | ~ in(X37,X35)
        | in(X37,X36) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X38,X39),X38)
        | subset(X38,X39) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X38,X39),X39)
        | subset(X38,X39) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    & subset(esk5_0,esk7_0)
    & ~ subset(esk5_0,set_intersection2(esk6_0,esk7_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48] :
      ( ( in(X44,X41)
        | ~ in(X44,X43)
        | X43 != set_intersection2(X41,X42) )
      & ( in(X44,X42)
        | ~ in(X44,X43)
        | X43 != set_intersection2(X41,X42) )
      & ( ~ in(X45,X41)
        | ~ in(X45,X42)
        | in(X45,X43)
        | X43 != set_intersection2(X41,X42) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_3(X46,X47,X48),X48)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X46,X47,X48),X46)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X46,X47,X48),X47)
        | X48 = set_intersection2(X46,X47) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X46,X47,X48),X46)
        | in(esk2_3(X46,X47,X48),X48)
        | X48 = set_intersection2(X46,X47) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X46,X47,X48),X47)
        | in(esk2_3(X46,X47,X48),X48)
        | X48 = set_intersection2(X46,X47) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk5_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk7_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk7_0)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,esk7_0),esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X3)
    | in(esk1_2(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    subset(set_intersection2(esk5_0,X1),esk7_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_intersection2(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk7_0)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(esk5_0,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X50] : set_intersection2(X50,X50) = X50,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k3_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(set_intersection2(esk5_0,X1),X2)
    | in(esk1_2(set_intersection2(esk5_0,X1),X2),esk7_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk5_0,X1)
    | in(esk1_2(esk5_0,X1),esk7_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk5_0,set_intersection2(X1,esk7_0))
    | ~ in(esk1_2(esk5_0,set_intersection2(X1,esk7_0)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,esk6_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk5_0,set_intersection2(esk6_0,esk7_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk1_2(esk5_0,set_intersection2(esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk5_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_14]),c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU128+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:45:03 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.29/1.74  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.29/1.74  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.74  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------