↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU128+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:23:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  35   ~;  40   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   5 sgn  29   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t19_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X3)
        & subset(X1,X2) )
     => subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_xboole_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X2)
            & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(idempotence_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X3)
          & subset(X1,X2) )
       => subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t19_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
      ( ( subset(X12,X13)
        | ~ in(esk1_2(X12,X13),X13) )
      & ( subset(X12,X13)
        | in(esk1_2(X12,X13),X12) )
      & ( in(X11,X10)
        | ~ in(X11,X9)
        | ~ subset(X9,X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk5_0,set_intersection2(esk6_0,esk7_0))
    & subset(esk5_0,esk7_0)
    & subset(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( X22 = set_intersection2(X20,X21)
        | in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X22)
        | in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X21) )
      & ( X22 = set_intersection2(X20,X21)
        | in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X22)
        | in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X20) )
      & ( X22 = set_intersection2(X20,X21)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X21)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X20)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X22) )
      & ( X17 != set_intersection2(X15,X16)
        | in(X19,X17)
        | ~ in(X19,X16)
        | ~ in(X19,X15) )
      & ( X17 != set_intersection2(X15,X16)
        | ~ in(X18,X17)
        | in(X18,X16) )
      & ( X17 != set_intersection2(X15,X16)
        | ~ in(X18,X17)
        | in(X18,X15) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk5_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X3 != set_intersection2(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk5_0)
    | in(X1,esk7_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_2(X1,esk7_0),esk5_0)
    | subset(X1,esk7_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    subset(set_intersection2(esk5_0,X1),esk7_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X4 != set_intersection2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(esk5_0,X2))
    | in(X1,esk7_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X24] : set_intersection2(X24,X24) = X24,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k3_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_2(set_intersection2(esk5_0,X1),X2),esk7_0)
    | subset(set_intersection2(esk5_0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk1_2(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)),X2)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)),X3)
    | subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_2(esk5_0,X1),esk7_0)
    | subset(esk5_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_2(esk5_0,set_intersection2(X1,esk7_0)),X1)
    | subset(esk5_0,set_intersection2(X1,esk7_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk5_0)
    | in(X1,esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk5_0,set_intersection2(esk6_0,esk7_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk1_2(esk5_0,set_intersection2(esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk5_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_14]),c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU128+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:54:21 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1504365 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45  % Search class: FGHSM-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 1504373 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45  % Search class: FGHSM-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 16
% 0.14/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 25
% 0.14/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.14/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 23
% 0.14/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 218
% 0.14/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.14/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 97
% 0.14/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 116
% 0.14/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.14/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.14/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.14/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 456
% 0.14/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 386
% 0.14/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.14/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 445
% 0.14/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 0.14/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.14/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 95
% 0.14/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 73
% 0.14/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 84
% 0.14/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.14/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 0.14/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 59
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 205
% 0.14/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 577
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 29
% 0.14/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 844
% 0.14/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 683
% 0.14/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 75
% 0.14/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 100
% 0.14/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 31
% 0.14/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 13
% 0.14/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 6052
% 0.14/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 346
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.45  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3384 pages
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % User time                : 0.060 s
% 0.14/0.45  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Total time               : 0.075 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------